Justin Raimondo

At This Ungodly Hour

Posted by Justin Raimondo on April 18, 2008

What, in the name of all that’s holy, is anyone doing up at 5:28 am? At this ungodly hour, one can only be up to no good. Unless you’re over 50, like me, in which case it’s simply old age: with the sand in the hourglass moving rather too quickly, we oldsters simply want to experience as much of the time we have left in a state of wakefulness as possible. That’s one explanation: here‘s another. Well, then, be that as it may, let’s get on with the day’s news, and there sure is a lot of it:

Our quote of the day comes from Andrew Sullivan, commenting on the Obama-is-a-terrorist meme that was repeated over and over at Obama’s interrogation debate with Hillary on ABC the other night:

“The Clintons began their career fighting Nixon. They ended up, in terms of political tactics, becoming him.”

Actually, that’s not quite fair to Nixon, who believed in something, if only in the historic import of his own opportunism. The Clintons, for their part, believe in nothing but the exercise of power for its own sake.

Via Matt Yglesias, we have more evidence that John McCain is not only a hypocrite, but a shill for a Certain Country:

“First, John McCain says he’ll veto any bill that contains earmarks. Second, ThinkProgress notes that American aid to Israel is handled through earmarks and wonders if McCain plans on cutting that. McCain’s campaign responds, of course, that aid to Israel will keep flowing.”

Let it never be said that John McCain let principle get in the way of the one overriding Principle of all presidential campaigns in the good old US of A: kowtowing to Tel Aviv is obligatory. 

Lest anyone think Barack Obama is the exception, the indispensable Philip Weiss points out:

“[Daniel] Kurtzer is Obama’s surrogate, and here he is in the Philadelphia Jewish Voice, on the eve of the Pennsylvania primary, smearing Walt and Mearsheimer before a Jewish audience in order to advance Obama’s campaign:

“‘Now, we’ve seen in this country, specious, dangerous, venomous arguments couched in academic terms, couched in public policy terms, that seek to undermine the support of Americans for the state of Israel. I’m now something of an academic. I don’t think my academic colleagues quite see me that way, but I go to work with them everyday. And I see two professors, Stephen Walt and John Mearsheimer, under the guise of an academic exercise, write such nonsense about the policy process in this country, about the pro-Israel community in this country, and about politics, it really just blows the mind. It’s amazing.

“‘And yet, it’s against that backdrop that we are blessed with three candidates in whom we can trust with respect to their support for the state of Israel. And Barack Obama is among those candidates.’

“Note the little air-kiss to McCain there. Disgusting. This is a smear campaign, designed to prove Obama’s bona fides.”

I guess that means we won’t be hearing from Obama on the Israeli campaign to undermine what’s left of the “peace process, which is summed up in the following headline:

Israel plans 100 new homes in W.Bank settlements” – yes, we can always count on the Israelis doing their part for “peace” in the Middle East. Reuters goes on to report:

“Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, in keeping with the previous government’s policy, has vowed to keep West Bank settlement blocs—including Ariel and Elkana—under any future peace accord. The Olmert government argues that this warrants the continued building of homes within in the settlement blocs, though U.S. officials have consistently demanded a freeze.”

One can hardly blame the Israelis: after all, when their American surrogates and agents do such a good job of vetting and otherwise taming our presidential candidates, not to mention candidates for other offices, why should they listen to our tepid appeals—when they know we don’t mean, and, even if we did, no American politician in his right mind would even consider enforcing our demands pleas?

Yean, we’re surging in Iraq, alright—surging backwards:

“A company of government troops abandoned its positions in Sadr City when the forces came under attack from Shiite militiamen who took advantage of a sandstorm to attack, police said Friday.”

This might not seem like progress to you, but, alas—as I’ve pointed out on several occasions—it is progress, if you live in Bizarro World.

Remember that brouhaha over those British sailors captured by the Iranians and paraded around on Iranian television? According to the Brits, they were seized in Iraqi waters, and the whole thing was yet more evidence of Iran’s warlike intentions in the Gulf. At the time, I rather doubted this, and pointed to the indeterminate border as the probable cause of the incident, and, it turns out, I was right, according to the London Times, which has the documents to prove it:

“Fifteen British sailors and Marines were seized by Iran in internationally disputed waters and not in Iraq’s maritime territory as Parliament was told, according to new official documents released to The Times. The Britons were seized because the US-led coalition designated a sea boundary for Iran’s territorial waters without telling the Iranians where it was, internal Ministry of Defence briefing papers reveal. Documents released under the Freedom of Information Act detail for the first time the blunders last spring that led to what an all-party committee of MPs came to describe as a ‘national embarrassment.’

“Newly released Ministry of Defence documents state that:
— The arrests took place in waters that are not internationally agreed as Iraqi;
— The coalition unilaterally designated a dividing line between Iraqi and Iranian waters in the Gulf without telling Iran where it was;
— The Iranian Revolutionary Guards’ coastal protection vessels were crossing this invisible line at a rate of three times a week; It was the British who apparently raised their weapons first before the Iranian gunboats came alongside.”

Game, set, match ....

While we’re on the subject of national embarrassments, the

“The war in Iraq has become “a major debacle” and the outcome “is in doubt” despite improvements in security from the buildup in U.S. forces, according to a highly critical study published Thursday by the Pentagon’s premier military educational institute. The report released by the National Defense University … was published by the university’s National Institute for Strategic Studies , a Defense Department research center.’"Measured in blood and treasure, the war in Iraq has achieved the status of a major war and a major debacle,’ says the report’s opening line.”

“A major debacle”—as opposed to this relatively minor debacle, as reported by the New York Post:

“It’s a good thing Osama wasn’t walking through SoHo yesterday morning. Two sets of confidential blueprints for the planned Freedom Tower, which is set to rise at Ground Zero, were carelessly dumped in a city garbage can on the corner of West Houston and Sullivan streets, The Post has learned.

“Experts said the detailed, floor-by-floor schematics contain enough detail for terrorists to plot a devastating attack. ‘Secure Document - Confidential,’ warns the title page on each of the two copies of the 150-page schematic that a homeless, recovering drug addict discovered in the public trash can.”

Yead, it sure is a good thing Osama wasn’t walking through SoHo yesterday morning—or, was he ...?


Comments

When Dennis has basic facts like Israel’s caiptol down, maybe he’ll be worth reading.

Posted by RonL on Apr 18, 2008.

Click to flag this comment as abusive

“One can hardly blame the Israelis: after all, when their American surrogates and agents do such a good job of vetting and otherwise taming our presidential candidates, not to mention candidates for other offices, why should they listen to our tepid appeals...”

And that’s exactly what the Israel lobby and its offshoots, many of which hide behind the 1st Amendment, amount to: agents of Israel. They should be forced to register as foreign agents.
Can you imagine if, say, there were millions of Iranian Americans who had the power of the Israel lobby and used it to coerce Congress to funnel billions to that Islamic state? Outrage. But when millions of Jewish and Christian Zionists do the same for the Jewish state, its taboo NOT to go along. That’s because Israel is a “democracy”, you see; the kind of authoritarian democracy that institutionally discriminates against non-Jews:
http://www.zcommunications.org/znet/viewArticle/17025

And pointing this out is “anti-Semitic,” you see, a real thought crime, the kind that can get you stigmatized and, if all goes according to plan, maybe even someday arrested for “hate.” http://www.jewishpress.com/displayContent_new.cfm?contentid=31181&mode=a&sectionid=1&contentname=U.S._Government_Equates_Some_Criticism_Of_Israel_With_Anti-Semitism&recnum=1
Now theres a tactic that the Marxist Southern Poverty Law Center can really appreciate.

Yeah, Israel and its Zionist agents really share America’s values of liberty, free speech, and equal rights for all. It’s just that some people are more equal than others.

Posted by Ed on Apr 18, 2008.

Click to flag this comment as abusive

Justin, my thinking is that we knew that the Iranians would not know about the border in the water and kill the Brits in an act of bloody savagery quickly swaying public opinion toward the war the neo-cons want.  It was worth a shot and for neo-cons and their ilk lives are of little consequence, especially when they are part or the hegemonic nwo cause.

Nucci you right: they were trying for a Gulf of Tonken incident.
Justin for a few days the British and Israeli press were talking about Iranian and American talks over the last five years. Then nothing, even on your site what happened?

Posted by jack on Apr 18, 2008.

Click to flag this comment as abusive

Sorry if an off-topic post is annoying to anyone. But, as I have never taken the time to email Mr. Raimondo with encouragement, I may as well make it public!

I followed you over here from LRC, sir. I thank you for that. Been lurking for quite some time. (Don’t tell Mr. Rockwell, but this is my favorite site now.)

I truly appreciate your honest, straight-forward, consistent, and diligent writing for peace.

no time for saergeants

Regarding the Israel-Palestine dispute has anyone noticed that “occupied territories” of years ago was gradually replaced with “disputed territories” and is now defined by obedient U.S. media as “territory Palestinians seek?” The language continues to change in efforts to shield the lobby from public scrutiny.

Posted by Jim on Apr 20, 2008.

Click to flag this comment as abusive

Mr. Raimondo,
Yes, I share your sleeping disorder and,wake up at very odd hours with an urgent sense of emergency, stagger to the laptop and go to Antiwar.com. The first stop on the internet as Daniel Ellsberg says. I only wish more writers had your integrity, honesty, courage, and the savage indignation we desperately need today.

Saw a “Obama-Cheney 2008” sticker on a telephone pole last week.
God bless you!

Posted by Dan on Apr 21, 2008.

Click to flag this comment as abusive

Ed.
Foreign agents of Israel should register and do. US citizens can support any country they wish.
Have you ever called for the Oil lobby to be registered as an agent of the Arab world? What of lobbyists for companies trading with Eurabia and the Arab world.
I didn’t think so

Jim,
The territories are not occupied under international law, as Israel did not conquer them from as sovereign territory. They were controlled but not annexed by Egypt and Jordan.
However, the Islamist-Thirdworldist UN and Eurabia have conspired on this issue and control the language.

Posted by RonL on Apr 21, 2008.

Click to flag this comment as abusive

RonL:
“The present Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) does not apply to such organizations as the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), various organizations involved in policy towards Cuba, and several other organizations who work solely on behalf of the policies of foreign governments.”
http://www.democracyinaction.org/dia/organizationsORG/cnif/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=2678
PS: The oil lobby wasn’t decisive in lying America into the Iraq war; Israel and its agents were. US citizens can indeed support any country they wish, but when they subvert the interests of their own country to advance the interests of a foreign country, as, for example, Feith, Wurmser, Wolfowitz and Perle have, that’s called treason. The fact that they haven’t been prosecuted yet doesn’t make it legal.

Posted by Ed on Apr 23, 2008.

Click to flag this comment as abusive

Treason is helping an enemy country in time of war.

Perle is no Zionist and is literlaly in bed with an Arab.
The others have never shown themselves to be Zionists above neocons. None have condemned the Bush administration for pursuing the creation of Hamastan out of Israel. The are right-liberals dedicated to the Wilsonian dream of Democracy, uber alles.

The Israeli government was pushing for action against Iran, not Iraq. Neocons simply used Israel as an excuse to deflect any criticism as antisemitic.

AIPAC is no more a criminal organization than the Scandinavian American Association.

Posted by RonL on Apr 23, 2008.

Click to flag this comment as abusive

Post a Comment

By submitting this form, you give Taki's Magazine permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. Personal attacks, ethnic slurs, the riding of hobby horses and the beating of dead ones will be deleted as soon as they are detected by our small but alert staff. Repeat abusers of this policy will be barred from leaving comments. All comments reflect only the views of those posting them and not necessarily those of this website, its editors, or authors. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.

Commenting is not available in this section entry.