Back in the Briar Patch
Like a catfish slipping off deck into cool, polluted waters, I’m back in NYC tonight—staying in an Orchard Street apartment rented off Craig’s List, taking a much needed vacation from hazardous trees, menacing highway entrance ramps, dour Yankees, and undergraduates. At long last, I can hear not a single cricket, bird, or bee—but instead the buzz of the street, and a night scene which I’m 10 years too old to enjoy. Still, it’s nice to know it’s there. (It’s all fine and dandy to live outside NYC when you’re single, but once you settle down and start a family, it’s really time to move back, I firmly believe. We’ll see if my Texas Kappa agrees.)
The Lower East Side was dank and dull as a soggy bagel back in the 80s, so I never came here. Instead, as a young idiot, I would haunt the pre-Giuliani East Village, for the three years or so when I was a “punk rock poser.” Which means I rather liked some of the fashions—but mostly the girls who wore them—while the music left me cold. (Of course I had the requisite Clash albums, and loved the Ramones, but that was pretty much it. I drew the line at the Buzzcocks, for instance.) Up and down Avenue B I used to troll, with my baffled friends from the local Latin Mass, in search of some vaguely defined “adventure,” convincing myself that I was somehow carrying on the tradition of Catholic “decadents” such as J.K. Huysmans and Ernest Dowson—except for the part, you know, about creating great works of art. Nothing came of it—at least nothing worth confessing, and that’s just as well. At last I had to face the fact that I was less like a bookish Joey Ramone than Woody Allen in a scapular. (Minus the creepy underaged thing.) And the punk girls could see right past my Doc Marten’s and Meatmen t-shirt, to the Mauriac novel in my back pocket. Poser....
This trip is very much tamer, despite the urban grit that wafts in through the window of this tiny, tiny apartment. I’d forgotten just how small an urban sink could be. You can barely brush your teeth in the kitchen sink here—another good argument for sobriety. Still, I’m having my share of fun which might be worth a mention. For one thing, I’m getting together with some of my favorite writers for this site. Last night, I joined Richard Cowden and Frank Purcell at a sushi restaurant that features some of the best bellydancers I’ve ever seen. (No they’re not called “fishbelly dancers,” in case you were curious.) The spot on St. Mark’s Place that features these talented girls is called Je’Bon, and I highly commend it to anyone who visits the city. Every Wednesday, a variety of women of every race—and let me warn you, body type—goes on stage to strut her stuff. Amateurs take lessons, videos are made, and all the proceedings are accompanied by a hurdy-gurdy and, get this—a Theremin. That’s the primitive electronic instrument which makes those “woop-woop” sounds in 50s sci-fi movies, invented by the offbeat Russian electronics genius Léon Theremin—one of Stalin’s victims in the 30s. There’s nothing quite so offbeat and non-New Hampshire as watching a Ukrainian girl do an Arab dance to sounds from The Day the Earth Stood Still, while you attempt to eat a sea-urchin. Try it some time.
The great thing about belly dancing is that it’s erotic without being obscene. (A hard concept for an Irish-American Catholic like me to accept, but I’m gradually learning.) The women have fun. They look terrific. They express their sensual power, and flaunt their charms, but not in a way that degrades them. The women in the room don’t roll their eyes or watch their watches—as they might do at a strip club. Instead, they imitate the moves, and wonder about trying them for their husbands at home. The effect of the evening is to introduce a truce between the sexes. It’s an oddly unfallen moment.
Today was less exotic: Dinner at a Burmese bistro, and a quick prayer at an Ukrainian cathedral that I love. Ironic how they sit across the street from each other, these two reminders of nations starved and tormented by their own governments. The historically minded person, in New York City, always has some reason to be rueful.
Some of my best time in town so far has been spent with my good friend Marty Browne, the most thoughtful police officer perhaps… in history. At any rate, the best read. His collection of conservative classics puts my own to shame, and he’s plowed through every one of them, from Russell Kirk to Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn. We spent a good four hours over Belgian beers at the marvelously stocked Waterfront Ale House unpacking the bizarre grudge many libertarians hold against local police. We agreed that “private enforcement agencies” such as anarcho-capitalists claim to want would do very well for people like… well, Taki. Maybe not so well for mailmen and waitresses. In fact, we realized, the whole private enforcement thing has been tried once: It was called “feudalism,” and beside it, most of us would consider even the LAPD an improvement. A slight improvement.
This morning I had good fun stopping by The New Criterion, Roger Kimball’s first-rate cultural magazine, to visit with James Panero and go to lunch with Taki blogger Andrew Cusack. His learning, wit, and piety—and sophisticated critique of the Almanach de Gotha—left me a little humbled, I have to admit. Would that I’d had half his polish, back when I was half my current age! I left him and Panero with copies of my new graphic novel—which I’d been promoting the night before on Sirius Radio. I made my way down to Geek Central, the comic-book mecca Forbidden Planet, and pumped the book to its manager too. It’s encouraging to think that I’ve come out with a book I could with a straight face promote at such wildly disparate venues. Not that this means anyone will bite.
You see, the book’s a trifle odd: A graphic novel richly illustrated by the brilliant Carla Millar, it’s named The Grand Inquisitor after a famous section of Dostoevsky’s Brothers Karamazov. It’s set in the near future at the Vatican. It involves an African pope. And it’s written in Miltonic blank verse. Have I sold you yet?
Hold on, let me run down the plot, for those of you who haven’t yet clicked over to read Andrew Cusack’s coherent comments instead: The new African pope is a theological conservative, whose election upsets an elderly, powerful cardinal. This old cardinal, it turns out, has been pulling strings behind the scenes since before Vatican II, trying (quite effectively, you must agree) to cloud and obfuscate the Church’s moral teachings. On sex, of course, but also a host of other issues. This cardinal, you see, is a pessimist; he’s obsessed with visions of Hell, and is sure that most humans are headed there. But he has conceived a plan: to render all of mankind confused about what God expects of them, so that on the day of judgment they can plausibly plead ignorance, and be saved without all that bother about “virtue” or “repentance.” In other words, he’s the chaplain of the modern nanny state.
Since he knows that with the election of an angry sub-Saharan Carmelite the jig is up, the cardinal kidnaps the new pope at the airport, and holds him hostage at a mental asylum for days, trying to win him over to his new plan of “salvation.” He threatens him with electro-shock, lobotomy, even Italian television. Does the stern young African give in? Will the Antichrist control the papal throne? These and other provocative questions are raised in this deeply unusual book—which was savaged by Publisher’s Weekly as “fundamentalist.” But at least we were praised by the worldwide Zenit News, and featured on Vatican Radio. Our creepy flash ads premiere in a week or so, and may well inhabit this site.
Have I finally written my best-seller, so I can go sit on a sand-dune and read The New Criterion all day? Probably not, although stranger books have sold—for instance that tissue of nonsense Dan Brown wove into currency. Now, blank verse doesn’t work as well as quickly typed drivel when you’re reading on the beach. Then again, I agree with Larry David about the beach, that it’s “a tedious purgatory of heat and schlepping.” Anyway, until I follow my doctor’s advice, and enter a concentration camp, I’ll be in no condition to parade myself before the public eye. Except my literary outrages—which I hope you’ll rush out and buy.
Comments
Sounds a bit like an inquisition. I have never quite understood the need to torture someone to save them from hell. Inane.
Anyway, I once had a dream of hell. There was no fire and no brimstone, I even got to see the architects drawings. There were no kitchens. Just floors and floors of brilliant white ceramic tiled restrooms, one directly atop the other. Oddly there was no plumbing and one could look thru the bottom of the extremely clean commodes and see nothing but commode after commode floor after floor. The it occured to me why there were no kitchens.
I figured out a bit later that Hell was completely empty. After looking at this place it was no wonder that GOD had not found a single soul that he could not save.
Anway, enjoyed the post and the plot Zirmak. Perhaps one day your book will become movie, who knows?
Click to flag this comment as abusive
The Publisher’s Weekly review:
‘Comics” don’t get much odder that this conservative Catholic tract ...Millar’s elaborate but stiff art doesn’t suggest that her dramatically posed characters were ever alive.
Nor does Zmirak’s tortured script succeed as blank verse or as intense normal conversation. The result is extremely sincere, but stagy and fake… a demonstration of what sheer dogmatic faith can achieve—and what it can’t.’
suggests a change of cigarette brands may assist John’s sequel writing.
Dji Sam Soe Fatsal 5 Filters seem especially commendable,as Senator Kennedy is striving to make them illegal.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Briar patch indeed! Here’s a link to the dance company, with more videos:
http://www.bellyqueen.com/
And one to the band, with even more, including one of Yasmine:
http://www.djinnnyc.com/
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Oh, now this is rich. Seitz, the impenetrable old coot, giving writing advice to Zmirak.
How very rich of Mr. Seitz, whose prose is impenetrable most of the time and tedious when it’s not, to suggest Zmirak
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Mr. Z. Great post, per usual. I’ll happily buy your book.
Mr. Seitz. I assume you know what you are writing about but I seldom, if ever, know what’n’hell you are trying to communicate.
In fact, I can easily imagine that Hell would have a daily paper written by someone like your own self.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
So now you’re “irish-american”?
Click to flag this comment as abusive
John,
Thanks for the plug and the link to Amazon. Just bought your book.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Thanks Russ! Always appreciate the help. Here’s another view of the book:
“An awe-inspiring achievement. Written in spare, supple, and beguiling blank verse, ‘The Grand Inquisitor’ offers an explanation of the Church’s travails over the last generation that is at once breathtakingly inventive and thoroughly believable. It casts its piercing gaze toward secularism and Islamic supremacism and concludes with a magnificent expression of abiding faith and hope. This is an imaginative, insightful, and simply beautiful meditation on the reality of the Church and the world, the wheat and the tares before the harvest, and the holy dilemma of the lover of souls. Nothing short of a masterpiece.”
--Robert Spencer, author of NY Times bestsellers “The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades) and “The Truth About Mohammed.”
Click to flag this comment as abusive
The story was based on the figure of Cardinal Arinze, an extremely orthodox and brilliant theologian who is now a Vatican official. On Joshua’s substantive point, I think residual paganism, in small doses, provides much of the charm in Christian cultures. The key point is, as Chesterton observed, whether the paganism being diluted is of the mythological kind (ala the Roman gods) or the diabolical (ala the Carthaginian). Read “The Everlasting Man” for G.K.’s wonderful analysis of the metaphysical stakes underlying the Punic Wars.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Try to get hold of a copy of Cestus Dei by john Maddox Robersts. Battlestar Galactica is based on Mormon theology. CD features a Jesuit Priest of the Church Militant who is introduced training warrior monks.
My Spanish sister-in-law got into belly dancing and her group would hold two or three recitals a year. To support the family I would be duly shipped off to these. It turned out the group included co-workers and some rather attractive housewives and a sultry red-headed wench that seemed to come from the mists of Erie.
Women looked on it as a way to dance and get a little exercise without having to drag reluctant husbands along.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Eire of course. So much for all that time with the Gaelic League
Click to flag this comment as abusive
I also had a punk-rock poseur phase, and I still love the genre and think the Ramones, in particular, are great. Not least of all because Johnny was an outspoken right-winger (hence, the vicious title Joey chose for the song he wrote in response to Johnny’s allegedly stealing his girlfriend - “The KKK Took My Baby Away.")
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Very ironic that the book borrows the title from Dostoyevsky. I assume that the author hasn’t read the great Russian’s other work, such as _Diary of a Writer_, or that he is mocking Dostoyevsky—who thought that people such as the fictional cardinal were typical of Catholic hierarchs, and that they represented Catholicism’s essence.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
I am very familiar with most of the great Russian’s work--although not that “Diary,” which I’ll make sure to read. The irony intended is that the character in this book is trying to make a reality of what was for Dostoevsky just a silly slur on the Jesuits. In any case, his deeper, and valid, point, was to critique modern utopias. As scholars have pointed out, if one takes literally the critique of Roman Catholicism in the Dostoevsky parable, it applies with even more force to the Orthodox church. Ruling masses of uneducated Christians through “mystery, miracle, and authority”? Could there be a better description of “Holy Russia” in the 19th century? What’s more, as a Slavophile, Dostoevsky was hardly inclined to reject the Orthodox status quo.
So he was conflicted, and saw in the socialists the extension and caricature of principles which already existed (by necessity) in historic Christianity. He displaced this onto the Spain of the Inquisition, but it applied with greater force to the Russia of the Black Hundreds.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Tu quoque, eh? Isn’t that a classic logical fallacy? Just asking.
Before you call Dostoyevsky’s most profound work “silly,” perhaps you should familiarize yourself with his thought more generally. Just an idea. (The _Diary of a Writer_, btw, isn’t actually a diary.)
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Post a Comment
By submitting this form, you give Taki's Magazine permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. Personal attacks, ethnic slurs, the riding of hobby horses and the beating of dead ones will be deleted as soon as they are detected by our small but alert staff. Repeat abusers of this policy will be barred from leaving comments. All comments reflect only the views of those posting them and not necessarily those of this website, its editors, or authors. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.
Commenting is not available in this section entry.