Coming Home
Today in Rome I approached the throne of St. Peter and for the first time entered the Basilica built on his bones. I was blessed to make this visit not as a tourist or art student but as a penitent; I’d been procrastinating about going to see St. Peter’s baroque enormity, wanting to visit the smaller churches first on the advice of a native--who warned that after St. Peter’s the city’s smaller temples might seem “anticlimactic.” Since I’m to be here for three full months, I thought to wait at least until Holy Week. But the simple fact is I wanted to go to Confession, and the easiest places to find it in English are St. Peter’s, or Santa Susanna--a parish run by the liberal Paulist Fathers. Santa Susanna certainly is beautiful, but one foot in the door and the place fairly screams “Help, I’m being occupied by a bunch of American priests!” The tabernacle is shunted off to a side chapel out of sight, while in its place stands a large, ugly modern throne to enshrine the celebrant. Despite all the rococo fixtures, the feel is distinctly… suburban. At the exact spot where the Eucharist would normally reside in marble and gold, here stands a potted plant. In Orwell’s honor, I can only hope it’s an aspidistra.
The day started out at a much more humble spot, in the ancient Church of Santa Pudenziana, which holds the oldest Christian mosaic in Rome. Built on the house of the Roman senator whose daughter (Pudenzia) spent her youth collecting the butchered bodies of Christian martyrs to give them decent burial (her own head is reverently encased here in painted wax), the church is said to have once housed St. Peter himself. And tucked away in a side chapel one finds, beneath a modest sign announcing it, a marble altar on which St. Peter said his daily Mass. Elsewhere in the church lie the remains of a man whose relative once held St. Peter’s heir a hostage: Lucien Louis Joseph Napoleon Cardinal Bonaparte. The great-grand-nephew of the little Emperor, the good Lucien served as a cardinal in Rome and took part in the First Vatican Council--which was forced to disperse when anti-clerical Piedmontese invaded. Ironically, it was only the defeat of Lucien’s cousin, Louis Napoleon, in the Franco-Prussian War, that removed Rome’s French defenders--and delivered her to the anti-clericals who promised to “unify Italy.” (Natives tell me “We’re still waiting....") The tangled skeins of history fray and lose their gold threads over time… until you stand before the grave of a forgotten Bonaparte in a dusty, half-forgotten church which is mainly used by Filipino migrants. All this, in a Roman senator’s house.
St. Peter’s square really does what all the art books promise: its colonnaded arms reach out to embrace the world. Once you pass through the brisk security lines, it’s a jump from light into darkness. The eyes take time to adjust. It’s impossible to take in one-tenth of the splendid artworks which reside here--the towering sculptures, the walls which hold not a single drop of paint, but are entirely made of colored mosaics, the baroque marbles depicting proud Counter-Reformation popes… and humble servants of the poor like Vincent de Paul. St. Helena, an Empress… and Juliana Falconieri, a blessedly neurasthenic nun who used to faint at the mention of sin. It makes perfect sense that this vast marble pile, heaped up with loving artistry in an age when papal authority was under challenge, and on the site where the first pope died, would expend much of its multicolored marble reasserting Peter’s primacy. There are churches throughout the city which focus on other mysteries of the Faith that catechized Europe, on the Passion, the Resurrection, the suffering of the martyrs, or any of dozens of attributes or apparitions of Mary. That is not the point here, though. This building stands for many things, but first of all for this: The fact that Christ has not abandoned us. That the Truth we seek is not to be found in tiny shards between the lines of a biblical critics’ crib of a butchered text, or even in the “inspired” heart poring over the Scriptures in his closet. We are not obliged to dig through the bone piles and fragmentary inscriptions of the Catacombs to find the “true” form of Christian life in an archaic reconstruction.
No, the Church is not a palimpsest, a puzzle, or even a proof. It’s a battleship, scarred and marked with patchwork here and there, with rivets fallen from its sides and the bleak records of a number of criminal captains whose best efforts could not sink her. As Noah’s ark must have, she sometimes reeks. (She’s stuffed to the rafters with sinful beasts like me.) But there’s nowhere else to spend our fleeting struggle with the sea. Far better to be a barnacle above the Ark’s water line, than the tallest tower to sink beneath the waves.
As I wandered from the Blessed Sacrament chapel in search of the anglophone confessionals, I thought: “When was the last time I saw nearly this much marble?” And then I recalled: It was on my first visit to the U.S. Supreme Court, on January 22, 1979. Those steps, too, I’m glad to reflect, were crowded with Catholics.
After a brief, businesslike confession with an English speaking priest from China--I wonder how many martyrs he counts in his family--I made my way to the great Cambio statue of St. Peter. Tourists were reaching up to touch his foot for luck. I paused, and kissed his toe.
Catholicism




Comments
Mr. Zmirak,
At Santa Maria Maggiore there are very many confessors who speak English. The languages they speak and, just as important, their hours each day of the week, are posted on the outside of each confessional. This may be a bit more convenient than going to St. Peter’s every time you confess.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Also, your wikipedia link leads to the wrong Napoleon.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
As a lover of Rome, I thank Mr. Z for this fine article! And I’m delighted that his sensibilities are mine. Santa Susanna is best seen from the outside, its wonderful facade from a.D. 1610. (In Rome, one needs to put a.D. and BC before dates.) And the American Paulists are terrible iconoclasts, as are the American Jesuits in Rome. Don’t go to Rome to see “Americanized” churches. The English chapel at the Venerable English College, worth seeing for the English Catholics buried and memorialized there, has also been “wreckovated”.
I hold the Baroque to be an aesthetic achievement rivaled only by the Gothic, and the best examples are mostly in Rome. My favorites: The Boromini Churches of San Ivo, San Carlo on the Quirinal, and Saint Agnes in Agony in piazza Navona. Also his Oratory and Propaganda buildings. Then Bernini’s Saint Andrew on the Quirinal. Add the masterpieces of others: Santi Luca and Martina, Saint Andrew in Valle, the Gesu, and my own favorite: Santa Maria in Campitelli, where the architect dissolves the idea that a room is supposed to have four walls, a floor, and a ceiling. Throw in churches with Bernini sculpture and Caravaggio painting, and you can make a trip to Rome out of just seeing the Baroque.
St. Peter’s is certainly sublime, despite T.S. Eliot’s dislike of it. The dome is perfection itself - and it’s a pity that the dome can’t be admired from the piazza. So overwhelming is San Pietro in Vaticano that folks forget that it isn’t even the Cathedral of Rome or Christendom’s first church or First Church. That honor belongs to Saint John Lateran, the church Christians have continually worshiped the longest, since a.D. 311. St. Peter’s emphasis in the Papacy. But for The Church symbolically realized, built upon the Apostles, St. John Lateran is spiritually the place. Also, Santa Croce in Gerusalemme has its own spiritually, however wanting it may be aesthetically.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Thanks, Caper, for both. I will fix the link.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
John, about Saint Juliana Falconieri, she is
remembered as the founder of the Mantellate, a
Servite order which cared for the sick in their
homes. Yes, she fainted when she heard of sin,
but it was not because of that that she was
canonized.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
John,
I say this purely out of concern for your eternal salvation – till you’ve worshipped at St Anthony the Abbot parish, the Russian Catholic parish, run by the darling old SJs of pristine vintage, you’ve simply wasted your time in Rome (save for the exceptional table wine you may have quaffed, and the gnocchi I pray you’ve partaken of).
Mirosma pomo’lymsha! Gospodi pomolimp’sa!
Remember, less nonsense, more incense; and tis nobler in the mind (and soul) to cross the Bosporus than the Tiber. When in Antioch, do as the Antiochians!
No more religious posts unless you’ve at least done the Sat night vigil. I’ll be watching.
Cheers,
Nicholas
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Lovely post. Thank you.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Although I’ve become an open (partial) enemy of this blog and of the ersatz “Old Right” (aka, hatemongers) which it has come to represent, I just want to say to John Zmirak, that this article of yours has persuaded me - after my bout of “converting” to Anglicanism - John Zmirak, let me tell you that THIS article of yours was what finally persuaded me to return to the Roman Catholic Church and to take the sacraments again, in good conscience, and with gratitude for how our Church never repudiates any of its members no matter how far we might stray.
Good on ya, John Zmirak!
(But otherwise, I say to this blog and to its editors: You have made a Mephistophelian bargain with haters, and you and your “revolutionary” movement will regret it - because you will lose power AND you will lose honour - in the long run. In the very long run, which is the only run that ever matters.)
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Dear John,
I really do fail to see how the editors of this site have made such a bargain. They ran one article by Jared Taylor, not even on the subject of race--and have run some 10 or so articles denouncing racialism, with nary a single article defending it. Would you say that every conservative site which ran articles by pro-abortion writers--even if they wrote on other subjects--were hopelessly compromised? I think you could make a stronger case for that, actually.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
By the way, John Ball--I meant to say “Welcome back!” I recommend a stout reading list of Chesterton, Belloc, the Catechism of the Catholic Church, Alice Thomas Ellis, Evelyn Waugh and Leon Bloy, to firm up your new resolve. God bless,
John
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Post a Comment
By submitting this form, you give Taki's Magazine permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. Personal attacks, ethnic slurs, the riding of hobby horses and the beating of dead ones will be deleted as soon as they are detected by our small but alert staff. Repeat abusers of this policy will be barred from leaving comments. All comments reflect only the views of those posting them and not necessarily those of this website, its editors, or authors. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.
Commenting is not available in this section entry.