Getting Comfortable With Rudy
Sam Brownback is out, but he’s not down. In a move clearly calculated to maintain his viability as a vice-presidential candidate, he met with Rudy Giuliani on Thursday in Brownback’s Senate office.
As Daniel Larison points out, Brownback stopped short of endorsing Giuliani, but declared that he is now “much more comfortable” with Giuliani’s position on abortion. Daniel seems to think that Giuliani might not win Brownback’s endorsement but points out, quite correctly, that:
“Even Brownback expressing his increased ‘comfort’ with Giuliani makes it that much easier for social conseratives to buy into the ‘we must stay united to defeat the she-demon’ rhetoric that is daily coming from the various leading presidential campaigns. It’s much easier for these voters to sell out in the name of unity if one of their leading figures gives them a pretext for believing that they aren’t really selling out their principles.”
Still, I think Daniel may be overly optimistic on the Brownback front. After all, if Brownback is considering endorsing Giuliani (and there’s really no other reason for the meeting), why should he do it now? The election’s still over a year away; and even with the ridiculous primary and caucus schedule that’s taking shape, there’s two-and-a-half months until Iowa. If I were Brownback, I wouldn’t endorse Giuliani yet, either.
Sadly, as the only pro-life Catholic among the two score of Republican and Democratic presidential candidates (no, Alan Keyes does not count), Brownback is proving my point about the potential for a Giuliani candidacy to suck in pro-life voters. One thing that Daniel and others haven’t commented on is that this meeting proves that Giuliani and his handlers are very serious about courting those voters. It would be easy, going up against a pro-abortion Democrat, for a pro-abortion Republican to trick himself into thinking that he doesn’t need pro-life votes. Giuliani isn’t making that mistake.
There’s no indication that Brownback asked for the meeting--Giuliani wanted it. He’s honing his message: appointing strict-constructionist judges; leaving the partial-birth abortion ban in effect; possibly dropping support for federal funding for abortion. Hillary Clinton’s not going to match that package, as unimpressive as it may be.
And since, as we all know, the alliance of pro-lifers with the Republican Party ”necessarily places voters in the situation of in effect having to buy a whole political package,” what are we to do? Take comfort from Sam Brownback, apparently, and sacrifice our principles to save our political viability.
2008 Election | Abortion | Catholicism | Conservative | Pro-life
Comments
Brownback is a traitor, Israel trumps abortion anytime with the neocons.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Sen. Brownback is a fairly recent convert to Catholicism and in no sense a traditional Catholic. He fits more into the AmChurch/ Novus Ordo/neo-Catholic mold. H
Click to flag this comment as abusive
@Theodore:
“Sen. Brownback is a fairly recent convert to Catholicism and in no sense a traditional Catholic. He fits more into the AmChurch/ Novus Ordo/neo-Catholic mold. H”
And? Are you saying most American Catholics do not?
I doubt that Rudy will receive much support from traditional Catholics (though, unfortunately, I suspect I know some who support the war who will support a Giuliani candidacy). But traditional Catholics are a relatively small minority of Catholics in the United States.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
There will never be any victory in compromising our principles. Better that the Republican party lose the White House than to compromise. Maybe what the REpublican Party needs is the wake up call of a Hillary Presidency to finally cast aside the neo-cons and embrace once again a conservative platform.
Pro-Life voters must stand firm and show that we are no longer going to hand our loyalty for half measures and minor gains.
Hilary will get a lot of the ignorant anti-war votes because the popular perception is that Democrats are anti-war and Hilary will throw them enough morsels to make them think that. Rudy is stuck with the unenviable position of trying to push an unpopular war on terror. He now has to pull a magic trick and come off as a pro-life candidate. Good luck Rudy.
Maybe the best thing that will come out of this election will be the fact that the Republican Party will dump Rudy and send the message that we are not willing to compromise on life. I was hoping that Brownback would throw in with Ron Paul
Some of the fundamentalist Christians are planning on running a third party candidate if the party nominates Giulliani. What I don’t understand is why don’t they just support Ron Paul? Are that determined to kill Arabs?
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Post a Comment
By submitting this form, you give Taki's Magazine permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. Personal attacks, ethnic slurs, the riding of hobby horses and the beating of dead ones will be deleted as soon as they are detected by our small but alert staff. Repeat abusers of this policy will be barred from leaving comments. All comments reflect only the views of those posting them and not necessarily those of this website, its editors, or authors. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.
Commenting is not available in this section entry.