Give the Money Back? Hell No!
The Smear Bund is busy, what with the Ron Paul campaign and all. I’ve covered the controversy here, but there’s more to say. The brouhaha is over the fact that the Bund’s crack investigators have been poring over Ron’s FEC filings, which identify each and every contributor to the campaign—they hate the fact that he’s been so successful, you know, it really sticks in their collective craw. One idiot, who works as a researcher for Neocon Central the American Enterprise Institute—one of the neocons’ bought-and-paid-for “thinktanks”—even penned a screed that Ron ought to give the $4.2 million he raised back, because, you see, it was all raised in support of ... terrorism (I kid you not!) because of the Guy Fawkes connectionl. Gee, they don’t get out much at AEI, do they? Not even to see a movie ....
At any rate, the Smear Bund’s investigators, in examining the rolls of Ron’s contributors, came upon one entry—$500 from one Don Black, of Florida, who apparently runs a web site called “Stormfront,” the habitue of self-described “white nationalists.” Aha! A Nazi! This must mean—[drum roll!] that Ron Paul is a Nazi. Or a Nazi sympathizer. Or ... something. All the Usual Suspects picked up this meme, and ran with it, clearly in hopes that the “mainstream” media picks up on it. Well, no luck so far, although it’s only a matter of time, but, in any case, the Smear Brigade is now howling that Ron has to give the 500 bucks back, or else forever face the charge that he’s ... a Nazi.
This, of course, is nonsense. Ron Paul cannot be responsible for the views of every donor: if he gives back the money, he’ll be ceding to the Smear Bund the “right” to vet every donor for political correctness. Will someone vet Giuliani’s donor list, say, for Mafia dons? Will someone pore over FEC filings looking for Commies who contribute to Hillary’s campaign (alongside the big arms manufacturers, ironically enough)?
Give the money back? Hell no! As Ronald Reagan put it when confronted with the same sort of ambush tactics: “I didn’t accept their money because I support them, I accepted their money because they support me.”
And about this Don Black character: this is the same guy who was mobilized by the Republican National Committee when it came down to the wire in the Bush-vs-Gore recount showdown. Black and his bully-boys organized a counter-protest when Jesse Jackson came to Florida, and, in one incident, they drove both Jackson and Gore off the stage at a rally.
As David Neiwert, the leftie component of the anti-Paul Smear Bund—whose de facto alliance with Glenn Beck and the Weekly Standard is a testament to the breadth of the anti-Paul “popular front”—put it at the time:
“Don Black’s Stormfront people were [in Florida] providing bodies for the pro-Bush protests, and his Web site proudly announced their participation. And as the Village Voice reported at the time: ‘On November 13, Black helped an angry crowd drive Reverend Jesse Jackson off a West Palm Beach stage with taunts and jeers. “He wasn’t being physically threatened,’ Black says, in a later interview.”
So, Senor Black was instrumental during that crucial time when the outcome of the 2000 election hung in the balance—and his “contribution” (his time and effort) was not only accepted, but was crucial. By the Smear Bund’s “logic,” then, the Republicans should immediately declare that election null and void, because they won it in a key state with the help of Don Black and his Nazi “boots on the ground.”
Right?
As Neiwert noted, back in 2003: “No one from the Bush camp ever denounced the participation of Black and his crew or even distanced themselves from this bunch, or for that matter any of the thuggery that arose during the post-election drama.”
So, please tell me, Senor Neiwert: why the hell should Paul?
Neiwert and his fellow Smear Bunders of the “left” are gatekeepers for Hillary, herding the liberal sheep into the Democratic party fleece factory for shearing and the lamb-chop barbaecue the campaign will throw after they retake the White House and appoint Neiwert to a Hate Crimes Commission. The neocons, like Beck and the Weekly Standard drones, hate Paul worse than any Democrat, of course, because he represents the authentic tradition of the Right, and he opposes their plans for endless wars. Hillary, at least, can be talked into bombing Tehran, when the time comes. What these two groups have in common is that they will spare no effort in stopping Ron Paul from cutting into their base of support—and, more importantly, raising the issues that need to be raised.
Comments
Dr Paul is the new Hitler, after all, he thinks of the USA first not Israel.Is Rudy a Communist because his main support comes from followers of the great mass murderer Christians Trotsky?
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Ah, the bringers of hell and death to innocent Iraq, the bootlickers to the Bush regime, the lovers of tyranny who pile excrement upon habeas corpus and other constitutional rights, presume to point fingers at Ron Paul. Dante needs to come up with a new inner circle of the Inferno.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
“Liberty works!” --Ron Paul
Obviously this is a Nazi ploy.
Any American who would support such
a notion deserves the coming martial Law.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Well, it’s the silly season. Enjoy!
And don’t get too concerned; the Ron Paul train will pass over this like it’s not even there. The sorts of structural disasters in the system that are making people take a fresh look at freedom, won’t be papered over with such ordinary, inane political tactics.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Here’s an interesting hit-piece from a writer over at the neocon American Thinker. Am I silly to think that RP should address these issues if/when the time comes?
http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/11/the_ron_paul_campaign_and_its.html
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Interesting that prior to CNN Glenn Beck’s libel, the Neo-Cons had
already been using the term “Paul-istinians” when referring to Ron Paul
supporters. See here http://tinyurl.com/3xgja9 or more here
http://tinyurl.com/2gs64y for example.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Were it not for the fact that the Zionist conspiracy’s indoctrination has resulted in 80% of the American population being illiterate, it would be a simple matter to expose the evil-doers’ vile subversive activities. What is needed is a campaign utilizing the theory of “one picture is a thousand words” to awaken the apathetic American masses to the acute danger at hand.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
The internationalist Bolshevik atheists that heralded the slaughter of tens of millions of peasants, Christians, religious Jews, native Russians (the atheists were not natives - they weren’t even semitic Jews - they were those that relocated to Russia from the Ashkenazi regions of Eastern Europe who had chosen Judaism as a political tool), church heads and others in Soviet Russia would have been proud of these second generation fake Jews that use, like a parasite, religious Jews and evangelical Christians for political and social power ploys.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Dear Mr. Raimondo,
I just wanted to write a small message to you and tell you that I liked your article Why They Are So Afraid Of Ron Paul. I also agree with this article, that he shouldn’t give the money back. If the Democratic and Republicans ever give back all the money they get from questionable sources, they wont have enough money to campaign in a single city.
Keep exposing them. I’m curious what you think about the 9-11 attack. You might think I’m nutty but, I don’t believe anything this government says, about that day. I also feel the same way about the Oklahoma City bombing. When you look at both of these tragic events, you realize that our government told a lot of lies. If you have a minute could you write a little note and tell me what you think about this. Thank you for taking the time to read this message.
Yours Truly,
Frank Fredenburg
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Could the Zionist/Bolshevik/9-11 conspiracy theory crowd give it a rest already?
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Post a Comment
By submitting this form, you give Taki's Magazine permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. Personal attacks, ethnic slurs, the riding of hobby horses and the beating of dead ones will be deleted as soon as they are detected by our small but alert staff. Repeat abusers of this policy will be barred from leaving comments. All comments reflect only the views of those posting them and not necessarily those of this website, its editors, or authors. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.
Commenting is not available in this section entry.