Grover Norquist vs. Walter Jones
Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform, recently went down to North Carolina to campaign against Walter Jones. Jones is one of the strongest conservative leaders in Congress when it comes to issues such as gun control, traditional values, and immigration. He is also one of the few Republicans willing to stand up to the Bush administration’s reckless foreign policy.
Norquist insists that the war has nothing to do with his opposition to Jones and that it’s all about Jones big spending and tax hikes. Jones major sin was his support of the Democratic versions of the Energy and Agriculture bills this year.
Did these bills have some onerous earmarks? Yes. Should Jones have voted for the bills? Probably not. But I doubt the GOP versions would have been much better. Jones has signed the Club for Growth’s “no pork” pledge, so these Energy and Ag bills would be, at worst, a mere blemish on his near immaculate conservative record.
I will be the first to admit that the details of fiscal policy is not my area of expertise. But I think I’m qualified enough to understand that opposing large new government programs would be more important than quibbling over appropriations bills.
In fact, since the Democratic takeover of Congress in 2006, most of the movement conservatives started criticizing GOP for abandoning the movement priorities and passing big new programs like The Medicare prescription drug benefit and No Child Left Behind, which gave the Department of Education unprecedented control over local schools and increased its budget by $20 billion dollars a year.
Jones was also one of the few Republicans to oppose No Child Left Behind.
When the Medicare bill was passed, the Bush administration estimated the cost would be 434 billion dollars over ten years—already making it the largest entitlement program since The Great Society—and that number has risen to 1.2 trillion dollars. This seems a lot more important than a few earmarks
Walter Jones was one of only 25 Republicans to oppose the measure. So where was Norquist? In 2003, he was on Crossfire shilling for President Bush where he had this exchange with Paul Begala.
BEGALA: [Bush] has embraced Teddy Kennedy’s entitlement plan for senior citizens to get prescription drugs. Is it because he suddenly had a change of heart and became a liberal? Or maybe is he just another crass, phony politician?
NORQUIST: No. The Republicans for four or five years have been saying they want to get a prescription drug benefit. They’d also like to see reform so that Medicare doesn’t crash and burn in 10 or 20 years, which is the same reason we need to reform Social Security.
BEGALA: So Bush signing on with Teddy Kennedy’s prescription drug plan is a good thing?…
NORQUIST: ... Teddy Kennedy isn’t wrong on everything, just most things.
I guess Norquist and Americans for Tax Reform are too busy putting out press releases about John McCain’s tax cutting credentials to remember this.
Comments
Norquist is a fraud when it comes to fiscal policy…
Remember Jack Abramoff? One of Norquist’s associates.
The so-called “Americans for Tax Justice” is as involved in influence peddling for cash-ola as much as any inside-the-beltway bandit.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
You’ve got Norquist’s number. He sold out big time circa. 2000; I specifically remember him re-assuring everyone about their doubts about W. No sense of shame. I think people trust him because he looks harmless and is named after a character on Sesame Street.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Norquist heads a single-issue lobby against tax
increases, so when an elected official breaks his
pledge and raises taxes, Americans for Tax Reform
campaign against him/her. It sounds pretty simple
to me. They don’t ‘do’ guns or spending restraint
or foreign policy or protecting pandas. Just tax.
Is this hard to understand?
Click to flag this comment as abusive
I am certainly no fan of Norquist’s. However, I see no evidence to suggest he supports neoconservative foreign policies. His sympathy for Islam and Muslims is not a secret; he is married to a Palestinian Muslim, and has ties to CAIR—neither of which suggest he shares the neoconservative lust for Arab blood.
I find it more likely that Norquist hates Jones for being an immigration patriot, as Grover is, alas, one of the Right’s loudest cheerleaders for porous borders.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
The odious Grover Norquist opened White House doors for Muslims with connections to the Muslim Brotherhood to gain influence. In my opinion Grover Norquist is a traitor.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Great post. I don’t see how many of these so-called “fiscal conservatives” can support both tax cuts and massive increases in spending. How do they expect to pay for more wars, entitlements, and bureaucracies? Apparently Norquist and his ilk see no contradiction.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Post a Comment
By submitting this form, you give Taki's Magazine permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. Personal attacks, ethnic slurs, the riding of hobby horses and the beating of dead ones will be deleted as soon as they are detected by our small but alert staff. Repeat abusers of this policy will be barred from leaving comments. All comments reflect only the views of those posting them and not necessarily those of this website, its editors, or authors. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.
Commenting is not available in this section entry.