Richard Spencer

Iowa Buys Organic

Posted by Richard Spencer on January 04, 2008

Last night’s caucuses presented some attractive storylines:

In one case, an unknown governor from a small southern state, outspent 15:1, soundly defeated the well-heeled and well-coifed multimillionaire who fashioned himself the perfect Republican. In the other, a half-black junior senator vanquished “inevitability” and the Dems’ new old guard—three of whom (Wesley Clark, Bill Clinton, and Madeleine Albright) were literally standing behind the supposed frontrunner during her concession speech.

Iowans bought organic—they chose hope, fresh faces, personality, and the prospect of change over experience and focus-grouped shine. But the caucuses also marked the triumph of a kind of narcissism and a non-political politics that might make the coming year difficult to bear.

In the case of Obama, the senator likes to indulge in self-dramatization suitable to French emperors and madmen. In his victory speech, Obama claimed that his winning of the Iowa caucuses marked a “defining moment in history.” (Obama’s fellow travelers in the media seem to be similarly light-headed: Chris Mathews exalted that an Obama win would be the “biggest American political story in modern times” and the “biggest story of modern Third World history.” World War II and the 2005 Tsunami seem to pale in comparison.)

Huckabee combines a kind of faith-based folskiness with the cunning of a used-car salesman. He is a true master of the art of paralipsis, whereby the speaker professes to ignore or pass over something while in fact emphasizing it – “and I won’t even mention my opponent’s history of spousal abuse…” In the Huckster’s case, he likes to be political while pretending to be “getting beyond politics.” Thus he creates a political commercial in which he complains about political commercials, as if saying, “ol’ Mike doesn’t care about running for office, he just wants to wish you a Merry Christmas!” With even more boldness, Huckabee held a press conference in which he announced “enough is enough!” and promised never to run negative political commercials – to prove his bona fides, he dimmed the lights and projected an example of the kind of attack ad against Romney he wouldn’t even think about airing…

Obama is usually the one criticized for “hope mongering,” for being heavy on transcendent rhetoric and light on actual policy prescriptions, but Huckabee is clearly like-minded. Take for instance the governor’s theme of “vertical politics”: 

“Ultimately, people don’t care about whether an issue comes from the left or the right, what they want to hear about is an idea that lifts America up and makes us better. It’s what I call Vertical Politics.”

Huckabee seems to have uncovered that little known clause in the Constitution that demands, “And the President shall make us better.” At the very least, he’s created a “Verticle Day” webpage (replete with a “vertical” blog, of course). A President Huckabee dedicating an actual calendar day to verticality is an event I’d rather not experience. I think I’d prefer holidays celebrating multiculturalism.

Moreover, Huckabee’s “inspiration” talk doesn’t seem to be mere ornament. According to his recent article in Foreign Affairs, he wants to base American foreign policy on “reaching out” and a “change of tone and attitude.”

Do we really want an election in which the two major candidates argue over the politics of personal uplift vs. the politics of hope? Do we really want nationally televised forums, in lieu of presidential debates, in which Oprah and Chuck Norris hug teary-eyed single moms who’ve overcome depression and lost 30 pounds—and at which everyone in the audience goes home with a complimentary fruit juicer?

With a strong showing in New Hampshire, perhaps Ron Paul might save us from a Huckabee-Obama political charade. That’s something to hope for. 


Comments

With a strong showing in New Hampshire, perhaps Ron Paul might save us from a Huckabee-Obama political charade

I love Ron Paul and plan to cast a losing vote for him but the chances of him finishing in the top three in New Hampster are lower than the chances an Eskimo female named Peepeelee will be the next Pope elected.

Barack gave a great speech. But Chris Matthews “Third World” trope is a forked compliment.

re:
“and I won’t even mention my opponent’s history of spousal abuse…”

This might better be described as apophasis, rather than paralepis

Posted by Anon on Jan 04, 2008.

Click to flag this comment as abusive

Ah, the Iowa debate:  Hillary using fancier words than the rest to say the same things; the Christian Right getting wet about that tax and spend, rapist-pardoning, ‘Gosh, Ah seen the light’ Jimmy Carter clone and evangelical liberal, Mike Huckabee; Israel’s Olmert chuckling about Baruch Obomba’s ‘We gotta (save Israel by) bomb(ing) Afghanistan.’ How nauseating.

With the group of mewling starlets we are currently confronted with , I suggest an alternative. I believe we should hold a National Caucus where we gather all the drunks within a 3 block radius of Union Square in San Francisco , herd them into a rope pen in the middle of the central Piazza and tell them whoever gives the most heart-rending speech on the glories of hooch, judged by a panel of unemployed retired Comintern Bolsheviki, they will be given the keys to a White House stocked with Tokay.

For Congress, perhaps the same contest but with Meth Heads assembled in Pioneer Square in Portland and judged by a panel of glue huffers from Helena.

The Judiciary? Why they’ll be appointed by the drunk in the White House but vetted by the Meth Heads in Congress.

In Free Volatiles We Trust.

Look it from the positive side.

Both Hilary and Mitt got what was coming to them. That
is always good news.

“I love Ron Paul and plan to cast a losing vote for him but the chances of him finishing in the top three in New Hampster are lower than the chances an Eskimo female named Peepeelee will be the next Pope elected.”

FYI, todays Rasmussen tracking poll has Dr. Paul in third place in N.H. I think his being excluded from the Faux News roundtable on Sunday is going to get Independents wondering what the MSM is trying to hide by excluding him.

Posted by John on Jan 05, 2008.

Click to flag this comment as abusive

John. Thanks for that info. I am so used to being proved wrong that I derive a certain perverse pleasure from the experience.

If Paul does finish third, I will be very leery of the next conclave :)

The Hipster vs. the Quipster--my satirical side will be thrilled if Obama and Huckabee (respectively) win their races.

Never underestimate the stupidity of boobus americanus.  Electing another phoney rock n roll boomer governor from Hope, Ark might be one of the stupidist things we could do; therefore it seems likely.
I confess I don’t know exactly who runs these things, but “Headquarters” has decided that it is the Republicans’ turn to take a dive.  It was supposed to be Guiliani, but Huck will stay down when instructed. Ron Paul messed up their script, big time.  We’ll soon see if it’s true that you can’t cheat an honest man. Go RP!

Mr. Lurker. As you well know, this is where everything is decided…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_AI8mC8XucY

The Prophecy of Paddy is fulfilled in the present.

And Mr. Paul is so far down in the polls, he will not even be invited into Valhalla to hear the truth.

Amen.

Mr. Sabin,

An excellent scheme with much to recommend it. The booze-hounds would definitely be a step up as they would believe in something other than their own infallibility, unlike the current mounds of detritus in the imperial city.

Post a Comment

By submitting this form, you give Taki's Magazine permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. Personal attacks, ethnic slurs, the riding of hobby horses and the beating of dead ones will be deleted as soon as they are detected by our small but alert staff. Repeat abusers of this policy will be barred from leaving comments. All comments reflect only the views of those posting them and not necessarily those of this website, its editors, or authors. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.

Commenting is not available in this section entry.