John Zmirak

McCain and the Protestant Ultramontanists

Posted by John Zmirak on March 03, 2008

Sen. John McCain is facing questions about his close ties to Rev. John Hagee (pictured here with McCain, whom he has endorsed for President). Hagee is leader of the controversial “Protestant Ultramontanists”—Evangelical Christians who favor not only the safety and security of Vatican City, but the forcible reconquest of the former Papal States, even at the cost of war with Italy and the rest of the 500-million strong European Union. This American-based movement (whose rise has puzzled most American Catholics and even officials within the Holy See) is a relatively recent development, which grew from readings of current events and recent history in the light of the final book of the New Testament, the Apocalypse. According to Hagee, a Texas minister, it is the duty of all Christians to “restore to God’s chosen country all the territory which it was granted by almighty GOD… through His appointed representative, the Emperor Constantine.” The region in question would amount to most of the currently Italian regions of Lazio, Campagna, and Emilia-Romagna—historically papal regions, which today, however, hold comparatively few supporters of the Papal States (known locally as “Guelphs”). Significantly, the Vatican has indicated no desire to annex these territories, which observers doubt it could govern.

Such obstacles do not daunt Hagee, or his hundreds of thousands of enthusiastic supporters in Evangelical mega-churches across America, who insist that a combination of “divine assistance” and significant military support by the United States will ensure victory. America must aid in the expansion of Vatican territory, Hagee insists “because almighty GOD will bless those who bless His priestly people, and curse those who curse them.” In a controversial 2006 TV sermon, Protestant Ultramontanist Rev. Pat Robertson cited the unexpected death of Pope Pius XI in 1939 as “divine punishment” for Pius’ acceptance of the Lateran Treaty in 1929, which traded “land for peace,” and renounced papal claims on territory then inhabited by Italians. Said Robertson, “I think we need to look at the Bible and the Book of Joel. The prophet Joel makes it very clear that God has enmity against those who, quote, ‘divide my land.’”

What motivates this movement? A particular form of Dispensationalist Protestantism that holds to a rigid set of timetables and preconditions for the Second Coming of Jesus Christ. “There must be wars and rumors of wars,” insisted Hagee, “and the return of the Holy See to its Promised Land in its entirety—we’re talking from Ferrara down to Velletri, the whole kit and caboodle,” Hagee told this reporter in an interview at a Waffle House in Texarkana, where the preacher stopped en route to a well-attended conference in Waco, Texas sponsored by the Protestant Ultramontanist youth group that calls itself “Teens for the Tribulation.”

Offering me one of the youth groups’ signature t-shirts, which read “Apocalypse—NOW!”, Hagee allowed his Grilled Texas Bacon Chicken Melt Plate to cool as he laid out his aspirations for the first 100 days of a McCain administration: “First, the restoration of the Kingdom, then the rise of the Antichrist. The Beast must ascend the throne of the Most High and be worshiped in the place of Christ. Then shall come the Great Apostasy, and the Chastening, and the Conversion of the Remnant, the Rapture, and the Coming of the Lord.”

Here Hagee referred to the Protestant Ultramontanist belief that after the reestablishment of the Papal States, they will come to be dominated by the “Antichrist,” who will seduce the vast bulk of Roman Catholics into a satanic cult. A saving Remnant, however, of the Catholics will convert en masse to Protestantism—after which they and the rest of the world’s faithful Christians will be “taken up into the air,” or “raptured,” to spare them the ravages promised in the book of the Apocalypse, which will doom at least one-third of the earth’s population (official estimates vary), and end only with the Second Coming of Christ.

Given Islamist attacks against Catholic churches in Indonesia, Sudan, and Iraq, and the growing hostility of governments in the region toward Christian faith and moral teachings, some leading Catholic clerics are grateful for the moral support from this surprising quarter. However, officials of the Holy See privately expressed caution about the organization’s broader agenda. “They are… crazy, these Americans,” one curia cardinal observed in an impromptu conversation near the fountain of the Piazza Santo Uffizio. “What are you people smoking over there?”, he inquired.

Given the pivotal influence of Catholics in both major political parties, and almost universal bipartisan support for the Holy See, few of Sen. McCain’s rivals have called him to account for his embrace of Hagee, despite his expansive agenda and unconventional theology. However, other aspects of Hagee’s views have raised concerns—such as his insistent use of anti-Semitic language in sermons and other public statements. For instance, in his latest book, Vatican Countdown, Hagee blames the murder of millions of Christians in the former Soviet Union on the Jewish origins of several Bolshevik leaders, such as Leon Trotsky and Lazar Kaganovich—despite their own renunciation of Judaism and overt antipathy to Jewish believers (thousands of whom they persecuted). Hagee has also described Judaism as a “false cult,” and identified the State of Israel with the “Whore of Babylon” described in the Apocalypse:

Leaders of organizations devoted to fighting anti-Semitism have repeatedly called on Senator John McCain to distance himself from Hagee in light of these remarks, so far with no success. Said McCain in response to criticism: “I am very proud of the Pastor John Hagee’s spiritual leadership to thousands of people and I am proud of his commitment to the independence and the freedom of the Papal States.”


Comments

I fail to see how Hagee’s fawning differs that much from the behavior of Roman Catholic neocons over the last 25 years. He is just tackier. “First Things” and “Crisis” are just as “Christian Zionist” as the Dispensationalists, maybe more so.

John Lukacs argues in his book The New Republic, that many of those considered part of America’s protestant community in reality resemble medieval Catholic peasants.  This would appear to be especially true of those in the South, in particular those in the states that comprised the Confederacy. 

Of course, like many of the worst things about the South, this cultural poison has migrated northward, like kudzu and is devouring much of the landscape.  Many of those who have gone into these new fake protestant “churches” actually don’t consider themselves protestants, but when given a poll form will locate themselves in the “Christian, other” category.  In this last point at least, they are correct, they are not in any significant way historically “protestant.”

Wow.

I guess we can think of Italy like a Rorschach ink-blot test.  Some of us think of Italy and think of wine, women and
song.  Others think of - well whatever “Ultramontane Protestantism” means, but as I haven’t ingested any illegal substances for many years, it makes no sense to me.

don’t forget this lovely gem.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=m8khCJTDD44

Hagee’s belief is a strange one indeed. (*side note: even Muslims call Jesus Messiah)

Also, don’t forget that, less than three months ago, Hagee was practically supporting Huckabee. He’s a self-centered opportunist. That McCain would call such a loathesome individual his “friend” says something about his character.

Posted by Yehya on Mar 03, 2008.

Click to flag this comment as abusive

As usual, Zmirak has it about 99% wrong.  Far from being an anti-semite, Hagee is a philo-semite, to the point of insanity.  He believes, against ALL Christian doctrine, that the Jews have a completely separate covenant with God which exempts them from any guilt, accountability or even relationship, with Jesus Christ. At the same time, according to Hagee, America is commanded by God to support, protect, and defend Israel, or America itself will (deservedly) be destroyed by God Almighty.

This convenient position makes it possible for Hagee to advocate bombing Iran, destroying Syria and basically taking over the entire Middle East as part of America’s obligation to the Chosen People.

** Comment deleted **

Beau Martin, you didn´t get the satire of the story? Wherever you read Vatican, put instead the state of Israel. Is it clear now what is John Zmirak´s REAL message? I am glad to John he puts some Christian based humor into a phenomenon which is otherwise completely devoid of both humor and Christianity.

Re: Beau Martin,

Sigh…

If I needed any more convincing to vote for Obama
this November, this would do it.

McCain is coming wackier and wackier by the day… I
think that I owe it to my country to keep him from
getting his hands on the US nuclear capability.

If you’re not smart enough to recognize satire, you probably shouldn’t be branching out too much further from USA Today.

Peter Ramus,

Yes, what began as a kind of extra-Church “moral ecumenism” in the late 1980s, early 1990s, has blossomed into a latter day ReichsChurch led by the gaseous Richard Neuhaus, the embarrassing Michael Novak and the opportunistic George Weigel. A most penetrating analysis of what lays at the core of their ideological Catholicism can be found both in a number of back articles by David Schindler in the journal Communio, International Catholic Revue and in Schindler’s book length writing. It would be dishonest to single out Oberstgruppenpastor Hagee and his Protestant co-religionists for criticism when house Catholic, Deal Hudson, and stem-cell compromise/Iraq War supporting Neuhaus have used Crisis and FirstThings as such willing vehicles for the Regime. But what I consider particularly sad is the close association so many otherwise accomplished theologians - Edward Oates, most notably - have had and continue to have with these people. I could go on.

John Lowell

John,
Please promise those of us who really enjoy your work,
thatyou won’t get so disgusted by the paleo-porn that
too often mars the comments section of this site, that
you stop contributing. The joyless ideologues and
wackadoos that often comment are not representative of
your large audience, but are proof that loneliness can
breed damaging pathologies.

Keep up the fine work.

Posted by Kevin on Mar 03, 2008.

Click to flag this comment as abusive

hagee is in tight with the lobby.  there’s no way the media will be allowed to cover this.

@Kevin:

“paleo-porn”???

I’ve long thought that perhaps the most important thing that separates us paleos from the “joyless ideologues and
wackadoos” is that we have a sense of humor (as John has proved once again), and they don’t.  Please don’t put them in our camp.

“paleo-porn”

I wonder what that would be like…

I remember the definition of Jewish porn: five minutes
of sex and a half hour of guilt. Is that similar?

Scott,
First of all, where have you been? Time to step up to the keyboard, or are you waiting for the Lent to end?

Secondly, some of the more fevered commenters here, describe themslves as paleo and seem just as warped by ideology as anyone over at Commentary or the New Republic.

Personally, I’ll just cling to Lukacs understanding of
“reactioanary” for purposes of nomenclature.

Posted by Kevin on Mar 03, 2008.

Click to flag this comment as abusive

Adrianna,
Craig Senna can give you a good idea of it’s various
and decidely unappealling dimensions. I don’t see you
enjoying it.

Posted by Kevin on Mar 03, 2008.

Click to flag this comment as abusive

McCain is the anti-Christ.

Posted by GM on Mar 03, 2008.

Click to flag this comment as abusive

Hagee allowed his Grilled Texas Bacon Chicken Melt Plate to cool

A sin against both God and man !!!  I can see now he is a false prohet for no man of God would allow such a delicacy to cool.

Herra Konkola,

You note a large “churn” inside of [American] Christianity.  You are correct.  However, this “churn” is only in the direction of Revolution, and anything towards Tradition is an exception to it.

From what I have noticed, converts to Catholicism are the result of marriages.  Converts to “mainline” Protestant denominations (Anglican, Methodist, Presbyterian, etc.) are rare; the vast majority of “conversions” are from some “mainline” Protestant denomination to various “Restorationists”, “evangelicals”, “Pentecostals”, and other assorted non-orthodox Christian sects.

It is not well-reasoned arguments that attract these people (mostly from “mainline” Protestant denominations; Catholics tend to just stop attending Mass, without ever formally “converting” to something else), but their American Revolutionary world-views.  They see the world as corrupt, in a kind of quasi-gnostic way.  The only true path is not through one of the “mainline” Protestant denominations (and NOT the Catholic Faith), but in the Revolutionary, culture denying, progressive “worship” of two wildly different types of so-called “Christian” faiths: Zionist dispensationalism (a la John Hagee), and Self-Help guruism (a la Joel Osteen).  These two men offer us a glimpse of “Protestantism perfected”.

I’m just curious about how many bites it took Hagee to finish off that Grilled Texas Bacon Chicken Melt and if there was any chewing involved. The rest of the article was over my head (thankfully), though the YouTube short of Hagee was riveting. The guy is Jerry Falwell on steroids. You can’t stop watching, and the apocalyptic art work is the best in the business, hands down.

Posted by ravis on Mar 03, 2008.

Click to flag this comment as abusive

Having grown up with this type of teaching my whole life, I can say that it is all too believable when it has been drummed into your head since you were old enough to imagine yourself burning in hell forever and ever.

It’s time to stop believing and start thinking. Faith based foreign policy is bad for all concerned.

Israelis must be laughing their asses off at people like Hagee, all the while using them as means to an end.

Posted by Roger on Mar 03, 2008.

Click to flag this comment as abusive

P.S. I was raised Pentecostal, but I just tell people I’m a snakehandler.

You get fewer weird responses like “Can you talk in tongues?”

No, but I can mix up a mean strychnine martini on the rocks.

Posted by Roger on Mar 03, 2008.

Click to flag this comment as abusive

Thanks, Kevin!

It can get discouraging. It always does lift my spirits, however, when I am attacked here and elsewhere as a “neocon” and condemned by sick neo-Nazis who call for my “children to be ground by the kike boot.” Combine that with the attacks I draw from the actual neoconss, and I know that I’m treading the right balance between two sets of dangerous, murderous extremists.

Wicked good post, Mr. Zmirak. Spot on and funny as hell. Kudos

Might I suggest that we tithe to finance the loading of Pastor Hagee and his congregants on a C5A for an airdrop over the Hindu Kush with a map that says “Vatican to the West”. Arm him enough and perhaps he’ll kill a few Taliban before squirting his spleen out his left ear from toting that flaccid girth of his through the mountains of the Pashtun Tribal Areas.

The End Times approach not because of sin but because the various morons and rubes of this country are bound and determined to share their dysfunction with the wider world. I know there was formaldahyde in those FEMA Trailors dropped off after Katrina but what we have not yet clearly established is the brain-rotting toxin that courses through the waters of some areas of Texas in amounts capable of producing such a staggering number of breeze-brained crusading ninnys.

I’m trying to be nice here but jaysus these people need a catered Jim Jones Koolaid Party.

Peter Ramus is back for more rough and tumble with his hated Papists. His new opening shot (above) offers a splendid example of the Tu Quoque fallacy.

Dispensationalism is the creation of John Nelson Darby, an Establishment Church of Ireland Anglican clergyman in British occupied Ireland in the 19th C, who, as one would image for clergy of this denomination in Ireland, had lots of free time on his hands—time spent cooking up Dispensational nonsense. So we can’t blame this one on Californianity, and certainly not on Dixie.

ALL RIGHT! THAT DOES IT! I’M LEAVING TAKIMAG AND NEVER COMING BACK. HOW DARE YOU MAKE FUN OF WAFFLE HOUSE? WHAT ARE YOU, SOME KIND OF ELITIST OR CUMMUNIST OR SOMETHING? ;-)

Me and my son are very found of what we affectionately refer to as “The House.” Seriously, poking fun at the Waffle House is downright un-American. Almost as bad as bad-mouthing Kentucky Fried Chicken. (I refuse to be reconstructed and call it KFC.) In my experience, people who don’t like Waffle House also like soccer and the metric system. What kind of last name is Zmirak anyway?

I have nothing against Waffle House. Every once in a while I also crave a heart attack on a plate.

The name is Austro-Hungarian. Croatian if you must.

Dr. Philipps is right about Waffle House, and I speak as a Yankee.  I was first tempted to try Waffle House because it was mentioned favorably by Walker Percy, and I was not disappointed when I finally had a chance to eat at one, in Percy’s own Covington, Louisiana in fact.

John really got me on this one. Until I began to read the responses, I assumed that the
Reverend Hagee really did believe in some form of Vatican expansionism in addition
to his madhat views on Middle Eastern politics. The reason I believed John’s spoof is not
only that it was well-constructed but also (perhaps more importantly) Hagee is such a
lunatic that he might well have produced the kind of prophecy that is here attributed
to him in jest.

Great satire John,Gore Vidal suggested years ago, that it made as much sense to reconstitute Israel, as to bring back the Papal States.

Posted by jack on Mar 04, 2008.

Click to flag this comment as abusive

** Comment Deleted **

In this piece, I was satirizing those who favor a “greater Israel,” which denies any homeland for Palestinians. I support the position of a large plurality of Israelis--a two state solution, with secure borders for Israel, and most if not all of the occupied territories given to a contiguous Palestinian state.

In “Protesting”,...how can there be subjective judgement....and not free will??...or, it is simply the “everyman” a pope, king, president, god application??

Posted by jim on Mar 04, 2008.

Click to flag this comment as abusive

If you really want to annoy neocons over this, then make your way over to http://www.spectator.co.uk/melaniephillips/526716/none-so-blind.thtml now.

After Prof. Gottfired confessed to being initially duped, I feel less embarassed about admitting that I too brought this pig in a poke.

Zmirak lost credibility as a Christian when he stated support for Israel as a Jewish state.

When you place bad geostrategic policies above saving souls you will tend to look evil.

Posted by jaels on Mar 05, 2008.

Click to flag this comment as abusive

The comment on Irish theologian John Nelson Darby reminded me of a startling lesson in geography and perspective. 

Israel is about the same size as the Irish province of Leinster, one of the four provinces. Leinster includes Co Dublin.

Hey, folks, lighten up.  This is pure satire, better suited for the Onion than any kind of serious blog.

I am appalled at the suggestion that I am writing a “serious blog.” In fact, the whole notion strikes me as oxymoronic. Better than oxyimbelic or oxyidiotic, of course.

Seriously, though, in the bad old eugenic days, mildly retarded kids would be labeled “morons,” moderately retarded “imbeciles,” and severely retarded “idiots.” I bet that was really comforting for parents....

i met chaps like this once, when i was a reporter in afghanistan. they later took the name ‘taliban.’

No word on when neocons like Michael Medved are going to demand McCain return the $2300 contribution he got from Hagee like they demanded that Ron Paul do with that $500 one from Don Black.

This is really funny and I hope that a few people in the media to ask about this. I hope the Democrats make a stink over this as well. Maybe McCain, Obama and Clinton can make themselves look so repulsive they’ll all lose.

Posted by Ryan on Mar 06, 2008.

Click to flag this comment as abusive