Our Kurdish Problem
Bob Novak spills the beans this morning:
“The morass in Iraq and deepening difficulties in Afghanistan have not deterred the Bush administration from taking on a dangerous and questionable new secret operation. High-level U.S. officials are working with their Turkish counterparts on a joint military operation to suppress Kurdish guerrillas and capture their leaders. Through covert activity, their goal is to forestall Turkey from invading Iraq.”
It was always a fantasy that the Americans could contain the Iraq war within the borders of their newly-conquered province, and critics of the invasion raised this issue before the war was launched—alas, to no avail. What is interesting is that the US, according to Seymour Hersh, is funding the Iranian affiliate of the PKK, which is known as Pejak, as part of its covert campaign to destabilize the ruling regime in Tehran. And the Israelis, don’t forget, have been covertly training and funding the Kurdish militants in an effort to establish a base of operations from which they can watch—and harass—the Iranians.
Note to Rudy Giuliani: this is what is meant by ”blowback." Watch, listen, and learn ....
Postscript: I hate to say ”I told you so,” but ... on second thought, I don’t hate it at all:
“The Shi’a in the south, the Kurds in the north, the Turkmen and the Sunni clans of Tikrit: we will soon be more than well-acquainted with their complaints, which have already begun. Every faction and a few yet to be invented will come to the fore, claiming the mantle of “democracy”: the Iraqi National Congress, the constitutional monarchists, the Islamists, and the various Kurdish groups, ad infinitum. Their demands will wind up on the desk of an American viceroy, who will then be expected to side with this or that group – on what basis and with what sort of advice is impossible to say.”
See also: here, here, and here.
Comments
Saying “I told you so” may be small consolation when contemplating the disaster, but it is some consolation
and we take can what we can get.
Have you heard of the “Three Stooges test”? It is this:
Ask “how different would the results be if Curly, Larry,
and Moe were in charge?” If the answer is “Not much”,
then don’t waste time passing moral judgement, just try to
to run away and be as far as possible before the next
explosion…
Click to flag this comment as abusive
No, no, the results of having any combination of Moe, Larry, and/or Curley, Shemp, or Joe would have been better than the status quo. Stupidity or randomness can never do the evils of a misguided hero.
That said, where are the democrats the y should put the war on the Adkins diet - given the juxtapositioning of Turkey and cottage cheese - Little Miss Muffet as speaker and the chair of the Kurds and ways and means committee shouldn’t be frightened away by the spider web of deceit.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Post a Comment
By submitting this form, you give Taki's Magazine permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. Personal attacks, ethnic slurs, the riding of hobby horses and the beating of dead ones will be deleted as soon as they are detected by our small but alert staff. Repeat abusers of this policy will be barred from leaving comments. All comments reflect only the views of those posting them and not necessarily those of this website, its editors, or authors. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.
Commenting is not available in this section entry.