“Race Doesn’t Matter”
Journalists covering the primaries in January characterized Bill Clinton’s “fairy tale” remark as “injecting” race in to the campaign, as if this was an illicit or improper development. This mistakenly implies that race was not already an aspect of the campaign—how could it not be?—or that it should not be part of the discussion. ~John Hartigan
Actually, there’s a much bigger mistake in this response, since the “fairy tale” remark referred to Obama’s self-presentation as a consistent, bold antiwar leader, when, in fact, his position once in the Senate was basically indistinguishable from Clinton’s and about half the Democratic caucus, including all the former supporters of the war. The fervently antiwar Democrats, led by Feingold, could never get these others to vote with them against funding for the war. For journalists (and the Obama campaign) to treat Bill Clinton’s statement about the “fairy tale” as something to do with race suggests more about their preoccupations with weaving the legend of Obama and their own view that the Obama campaign is a kind of fairy tale, the one in which all divisions are healed and everyone (i.e., everyone they know) lives happily ever after. Journalists (and the Obama campaign) freaked out about this statement on Obama’s record because it was accurate, and they knew that the main thing, perhaps the only thing, Obama had going for him on substantive policy was his early opposition to the war, which became muted and more moderate over the next few years.
If there is one thing that has seemed to unite a great many people this election cycle, it has been a tremendous desire to not want to talk about race, or rather to promote Obama in the odd hope that his election will mean that we won’t have to talk about it anymore (when, of course, his election would require us to talk about it incessantly, as we are already doing). That was certainly the initial mainstream conservative response, typified by the likes of Wehner (who has since denounced Obama quite ferociously):
A third reason for Obama’s GOP appeal is that unlike Clinton and especially John Edwards, Obama has a message that, at its core, is about unity and hope rather than division and resentment. He stresses that “out of many we are one.” And to his credit, Barack Obama is running a color-blind campaign. “I did not travel around this state over the last year and see a white South Carolina or a black South Carolina,” Obama said in his victory speech last weekend. “I saw South Carolina.” That evening, his crowd of supporters chanted as one, “Race doesn’t matter.” This was an electric moment.
It was electric for Wehner because it is particularly important for Americanists that race does not matter, or at least no longer matters, because Americanists accept the “original sin” critique of our country and, in keeping with their missionary zeal to Americanize others, they interpret national history in terms of fall and redemption. For a certain kind of triumphalist, it is acceptable, even necessary, to recite the errors of the Old America to justify its abolition, provided that the New be recognized as free of that sin. Nothing is more unforgiveable for the Americanist than to suggest that history did not end in, say, 1964 or that race may yet matter. Those who preach American messianism in the world must see the nation to be as “pure” for its messianic role, and for liberals and mainstream conservatives of a certain generation who find their ancestors somewhat embarrassing the craving for a moment when “race doesn’t matter” is strong. This is at the heart of the resistance to having race be a substantive part of any discussion: it should not be part of the discussion, it has been decided, because “race doesn’t matter,” and, tautologically, if it doesn’t matter there’s no reason to talk about it. Those who do so are “injecting” the subject into the debate, just as anyone who observes that Obama’s mixed racial background was essential for his success is denounced for “raising” an issue that almost all of his supporters “raise” without being asked.


Comments
Pretty good commentary: It is hard to disagree with a lot of it. Obama is a get along go along kind of Guy. He was raised in the Chicago machine, after all. I don’t expect a lot from him. He is no savior. He just is far better, than Hillary and the mad bomber. A dead turkey is better, than those two.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Great commentary!
Click to flag this comment as abusive
What intrigues me is how white liberals and others grovel on the floor in the presence of an “authentic” minority. Think Chris Mathews who confessed on a Primary night that his leg started quivering when Obama was speaking.
I offer the suggestion that deep down, these quiverers despise themselves, and in so doing transpose that negation onto their culture, tradition, and needless to say, their race and country. They dare not confront their inner beings because that would reveal that they have holes in their souls.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
What struck me about the “Race Doesn’t Matter” chants when I first heard about them is that Obama’s whole life has been spent advocating on the behalf of blacks. This is a man with a very strong racial identity. If he becomes president, it will be quotas, quotas, quotas. And when these policies fail, like they have for forty years, will the Chris Matheweses of the world start to wake up or will this “race doesn’t matter” fantasy continue?
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Excellent analysis of the psychology at work.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Mr. Larison, not without good reason, faults the Cultural Marxists for tautology and contradiction. Is the implict enthymenic syllogism any better?:
i. Cultural Marxists are evil.
ii. Cultural Marxists think race doesn’t matter.
iii. Therefore, race matters.
The minor premise is wrong. Cultural Marxists do think race matters. See the Cultural Marxist, the late Susan Sontag, “What’s Happening in America (1966)” <i>Styles of Radical Will<i>, NY: 1969, p202,203.
The conclusion is both Non sequitur and in itself wrong: Not only does skin color not matter (as eye color doesn’t matter), but “race” is a fairy tale.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Mr. Cundiff, I thought you said something about not posting at this site since it
has crossed the “brown Rubicon” . . .
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Sid Cundiff
As you are well aware (ie some weeks ago I provided you with links to the scientific studies), there is strong evidence for links between race and intellect. Your persistent espousal of the “race doesn’t matter” lie, shows that you are either a fool or a disinformation agent.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Mr. Ian:
You DO know--right?--that there are different kinds of intelligence, and that a unified and coherent society needs EVERY kind? It would be a very crippled, dysfunctional community whose paragons of “higher intelligence” were only those who scored well on “intelligence quotient” tests, which do not reward aesthetic or kinaesthetic or spiritual talents. Those kinds of tests only reward the kinds of intelligences that the academic establishments of any given society cherish at a particular epoch in their histories.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
I like this term ‘Americanist’—it seems like a good compromise on the whole ‘nationalist’ issue and it accurately describes reality to boot. There is no way on God’s green earth that George W. Bush or John McCain or Michael Ledeen or Frank Gaffney can be considered nationalists, but they can be considered Americanists. Which is to say, in thrall to the missionary impulse that Sam Huntington described so well.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
The strength in Mr. Larison’s article is his alerting us to the Obama/Cultural Marxist strategy: to call “racist” anyone who opposes Obama.
And “ian” gives them ammo. They need only to point to his rants. As for ian’s faux scientists, their evidence was obtained off the back of a Cracker Jacks box.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Post a Comment
By submitting this form, you give Taki's Magazine permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. Personal attacks, ethnic slurs, the riding of hobby horses and the beating of dead ones will be deleted as soon as they are detected by our small but alert staff. Repeat abusers of this policy will be barred from leaving comments. All comments reflect only the views of those posting them and not necessarily those of this website, its editors, or authors. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.
Commenting is not available in this section entry.