Remembering Norman and Bill
NEW YORK—Their memorials were held five days apart, each in one of Manhattan’s most hallowed venues, each one attended by more than two thousand worshipping fans, both attracting A-list mourners as well as the poor and the humble. William Buckley and Norman Mailer had great send-offs, the former, as a devout Catholic, in St. Patrick’s Cathedral, on 5th Avenue, the latter, as a non-practicing Jew who called himself an atheist, in Carnegie Hall, where art and imagination have flourished for decades.
As both men had been mentors of mine, their families kindly sent reserved-seat tickets, but it was not to be. Death unites the fallen and abjures snobbery and privilege. Paying homage to the dead means first come first serve. One does not tell an old Jewish lady from Brooklyn, or a Catholic for that matter, that they’re sitting in one’s seat. I was in the next to last row in St. Patrick’s and on the third tier in Carnegie Hall. Never mind. Both the service for Bill and the eulogies for Norman were once in a lifetime occasions. Tom Wolfe, sitting in the last row in the cathedral, whispered that the hymns were out of this world. “Yet the Muslims have passed us in numbers,” I whispered back, “and all they listen to are screams.”
Only Kissinger and Bill’s son Christopher spoke in St. Patrick’s, a conservative number for the man who actually invented modern conservatism in America. This was not the case with Norman’s eulogists. There were 27 of them, including his nine children, all of them talented and smart, all of them in the arts, plus writers, actors, directors and Mohamed Ali’s wife. Never have I been less bored by listening to 27 speakers. In fact, Norman’s offsprings should take their act to Broadway. Each one spoke on a particular subject about their father, but with one unifying theme: How a man with six wives and nine kids, a drinker, a doper and brawler, managed to weave together a single family unit which works. One of his actor sons, Stephen, swaggered to the podium, cleared his throat in the characteristic style of his father, and growled, “Carnegie Hall, Carnegie Hall, well, why not?” Christopher Buckley also mentioned the venue. Forty years ago his father told him that if he were famous by the time he died, he would like to have the service at St. Patrick’s. “You’ve got your wish, dad.” My close buddy Michael Mailer talked about boxing, Norman’s obsession, and how poignant it was when he, Michael, got too good for Norman and they had their last match.
There were many similarities in what one writer described as a requiem for two heavyweights. Both men ran for mayor, both lost badly, but many of the policies they proposed back in the Sixties were prescient enough to have now become laws. Bill brought civility into the raucous Bagel politics, and great wit. Norman brought passion and honesty into politics by mixing with the common folk and defying the distinction between words and deeds. Both became famous at 25 years of age, Mailer with The Naked and the Dead, Buckley with God and Man at Yale. Norman published 30 some odd books, Bill around fifty. Both men were extremely brave in the physical sense. Norman would fight anyone, and he was a good boxer as well as brawler. Bill would go out sailing in a tiny boat in storms that would have kept Horation Nelson in harbor.
I was proud to have been a good friend of both men, who incidentally liked each other very much despite being in extreme opposite political landscapes, and they had many debates and tussles defending their ideologies. Bill’s civility and wit will be copied—I hope—by future generations, while Norman’s enduring power of imagination in the novel will—again, I hope—get us out of the rut relativists have landed us in.
So, death is now ever present. Bill believed in the afterlife, Norman in reincarnation. Who is right, I dunno. What I do know is starting with Yanni Zographos, James Hanson, Jimmy Goldsmith, John Aspinall, Alan Clark, Charles Benson, Nigel Dempster , John Goulandris, I have now lost more friends than most men do in a lifetime, outside of wartime. What is important for me now is to move toward the door marked exit in a gracious manner, as all my absent friends did. I am, however, in perfect health despite the drinking, and even the back is now healed. Here’s to doctors. Having fallen violently down the hatch of my boat while trying to bring in a sail, I displaced my pelvis but was told it was just a bruise by a horse doc in St. Tropez. In the Bagel, ditto. One wanted to operate, the other shot me full of cortizone, until two ostiopaths, one in Geneva the other in New York diagnosed it correctly. They shoved—it took a lot of shoving—the pelvis back in its place, and I now feel 21 years old. Which means I am no longer Quasimodo-like and can marry the Speccie’s deputy editor at last. Perhaps Bill and Norman can come back as bridesmaids for my nyptials. Vive la jeunesse!


Comments
Taki,
I’ve enjoyed your columns for your years, even though the PC-orthodox shun me for saying so, but this comment (about Muslims) makes me cringe: “all they listen to are screams.”
Yes, it’s somewhat funny, but only in the most puerile way.
-Berin
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Sometimes, important people in our lifes, become more influential in death.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Mr. Theodoracopulos,
Do you think you could take a look at my blog? Thanks!
http://www.gopcatholics.blogspot.com
Click to flag this comment as abusive
The Pope comes bringing a message from the Gospels. Jesus came to tell fallen man that he must treat his fellow fallen men with dignity and respect. We all will have differences with others but as we wouldn’t want to be killed, we shouldn’t kill ourselves.
I must admit while watching the Whire House welcome for the Holy Father this morning that I had a fleeting hope that the color guard member behind Bush could have speared the little cretin… but that gives me one more thing to confess.
While I would dance on Bush’s grave no one deserves to be treated as the government treats people. Peace starts when enemies agree to no kill each other. They don’t even have to like each other. Old farts begin to find that young people are something both sides of the old fart community can come together and agree about, be it Grandchildren or annoying teens. Death is the great equalizer.
I try to crash Baptisms to offset all the funerals I attend.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
@ Durant, Interesting. What does that have to do with Taki’s article?
@ Maruska, Buy a mirror. It sounds like you can’t abide anyone who doesn’t agree with you on everything.
A dinner with WFB and Mailer would’ve been an event worth attending. Taki enjoys entertaining people. There’s nothing wrong with that. It beats the hell out of sitting around with a bunch of synchophants echoing, “I agree”
Click to flag this comment as abusive
@ Maruska, Whom are you comparing to whom? Is WFB Stalin? Or is it Mailer? If you’re going to try and disparage your betters you should at least specify how.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Taki,
When you stop winning Judo tournaments,then you can think about exiting gracefully.Until then keep on posting these excellent articles.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
As a card carrying Canadian Liberal, I found Buckley more stimulating and educative, even though I disagreed with most of his opinions.
Although I agreed ideologically with most of Mailer’s opinions, I was never a big fan.
I just found his delivery a bit too crass.
Both men were great, I feel their works will be relavent for centuries.
If someone asked me who I would prefer to have dinner with between the two of them, I would pick Buckley.
I feel that having dinner with Mailer would be identical to having dinner with my uncle Mihali, who would pass the evening by telling me (or anyone for that matter) how he’s going to seduce our waitress and describing ad nauseam how he would have sex with the said waitress in the mensroom.
RIP
Norman & William
Click to flag this comment as abusive
@ Maruska, I should’ve guessed you were a vegan. Mix in a steak, it helps the blood flow. How long did it take you to come up with all those analogies? Nice work. In case you weren’t aware, WFB reversed himself on the War and said it was a mistake. I’m sure you’ve never made one. Or admitted it. Sometimes spending time with people with divergent views is a good way to learn things. Try it sometime.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
@ Yiorgos, I tend to agree. Mailer was a brillant blowhard. I would think you could have had a discussion with Buckley. With Mailer it would be more like watching performance art.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
@ Maruska, It’s not fencing. More like shooting fish in a barrel. Your palate appears broader than your mind. I wasn’t defending WFB, far from it. I merely aritculated that, just because you disagree with someone, doens’t mean you can’t associate with them. Or find them entertaining. If that’s too much of a stretch for you, that’s your issue, not anyone else’s. Finally, your attempt at, “Declaring vitory and going home”,seems to fit your character, or lack thereof. Go read Teddy Roosevelet’s “Man in the Arena”, then pop off. Now it’s “Over”
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Godwin’s law Maruska, Godwin’s law.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Can we stop, already? Buckley was a neo-con brown-noser. A Manhattanite, Catholic sell-out.
A perfunctor of shallow, forgettable columns and sleazy spy novels. Why treat him like
some cultural icon? He symbolized how low we have sunk. That is what war (or cold war)
does to a culture. It raises the Buckleys of the world into serious literary figures. We’ve gone
from Emily Dickinson to Blackford Oakes.
Actually, Manhattanite sell-out is a redundancy.
NYC is America’s sewer. No wonder Buckley loved it there. What a con-man! Here’s to
you, Bill. Give my regards to Hef.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
#############
#############
What Brother Bill, may he rest in peace, didn’t understand about the Marxian progressives, with whom he liked to rub shoulders at this or that Jew-elite-connected party in NYC, and which socializing with the enemy explains the WHO and the HOW and the WHY of his very bad impact on conservatism ((now termed “paleoconservatives,” as the nation continues its shift leftward towards hell-on-earth GLOBAL ECONOMIC SOCIALISM)):
http://rushlimbaughisakook.blogspot.com/
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Post a Comment
By submitting this form, you give Taki's Magazine permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. Personal attacks, ethnic slurs, the riding of hobby horses and the beating of dead ones will be deleted as soon as they are detected by our small but alert staff. Repeat abusers of this policy will be barred from leaving comments. All comments reflect only the views of those posting them and not necessarily those of this website, its editors, or authors. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.
Commenting is not available in this section entry.