Richard Spencer

Rev. Wright is Right!: white people suck at rapping

Posted by Richard Spencer on April 28, 2008

The Rev. Jeremiah Wright was out and about this weekend and dropped a few more bombshells. It was a dream come true for the official conservative media, and they didn’t miss a chance to pile on, do a little more shilling for McCain, and express their outrage.

What I found most interesting was that all the conservatives were jockeying to see who could be the most politically correct of them all. The Weekly Standard, NRO, HotAir have all focused on the same portion of the text and all rehearsed the same meme: Wright is saying the same racist things as did that evil Charles Murray in his evil book The Bell Curve

The statements in question are as follows: 

“Africans have a different meter and Africans have a different tonality. European music is diatonic, seven tones. Do, re, mi, fa, so, la, ti, do. That’s Italian. Europe. In west Africa and south Africa, it is not diatonic, seven tones, it is pentatonic with five tones. Wintley [Phipps] points out that if you want to know black music, just look at the black keys on the piano. Do, re, fa, so, la. Just those five tunes. Those are the only five notes you’ll hear and somebody knows the trouble I’ve seen.”

“European and European-American children have a left-brained cognitive object-oriented learning style and the entire educational learning system in the United States of America.”

All this seems pretty harmless. The “left-brain, right-brain” thing is total bunk, but who really cares if Wright perpetuates cocktail party neuroscience? His point about syncopated rhythm is true, and I now wish I’d taken a few of those Ethnomusicology courses on offer at UVA so I could comment about the “African” pentatonic scale. But it all sounds entirely plausible.

Wright is talking about the self-evident fact that African drumming sounds a little bit different than The Marriage of Figaro, and that there are probably deep cultural, and perhaps even genetic, reasons for this. Is there any normal person (i.e. a non-Beltway journalist) for whom such a statement is controversial? 

Victor David Hanson went into hysterics over the “The Scary Legacy of the 2008 Democratic Primary,” claiming that Wright’s statements have unleashed the beast of racism in our country. VDH was appalled—appalled!—that Wright thinks that Africans are more “creative, musical, and spontaneous” than whites and that he dared to opine that white men can’t rap too good. Au contraire asserts Hanson, Homer was white, and that man was the P Diddy of the Iron Age!

I never knew that Europeans’ achievements in lyric poetry were ever in doubt (uh, Shakespeare?). This aside, what Wright was basically saying was that many people of African descent create musical arts that are markedly different than that of Europeans. Pretty basic stuff.

I remember being a freshman in college and attending an orientation party in the cafeteria. A rap group was performing, and at the end of the set, the lead asked for “a witness from the congregation”: a bunch of white students immediately volunteered, all of whom (I’d guess) grew up rapping along to Dr. Dré in the ‘burbs. Invariably they all sucked. It was the billionth piece of evidence that white men can’t rap! Is this controversial? It seems perfectly sensible that talent for rapping—spontaneous rhyming to back-beat rhythm—is not equally distributed. I also noticed some, ahem, patterns among running backs chosen in this weekend’s NFL draft.

The 300-pound Gorilla in the room is of course variation in IQ, and this is why when Wright raised the issue of cultural-ethnic differences, everyone started talking about a “reverse Bell Curve.”

I agree that IQ does not give a full picture of a person: perhaps Beethoven, Coltrane, and I have about the same IQ, but this says nothing about the fact that first two wrote music of genius and that I cranked out a few forgettable fugal ditties in Music Theory 302. Having a liberal arts background, how genes might affect intelligence is fairly mysterious to me; however, I still find the dismissal of The Bell Curve simply because its conclusions are a bit “scarry” (read: easily dismissible for political gain) to represent the height of intellectual cowardliness. 

Besides, in his most recent writings, Murray has worked to greatly complicate his earlier theories about racial difference:

“Homo sapiens actually fall into many more interesting groups than the bulky ones known as ‘races.’ As new findings appear almost weekly, it seems increasingly likely that we are just at the beginning of a process that will identify all sorts of genetic differences among groups, whether the groups being compared are Nigerian blacks and Kenyan blacks, lawyers and engineers, or Episcopalians and Baptists. At the moment, the differences that are obviously genetic involve diseases (Ashkenazi Jews and Tay-Sachs disease, black Africans and sickle-cell anemia, Swedes and hemochromatosis). As time goes on, we may yet come to understand better why, say, Italians are more vivacious than Scots.”

This passage was published in the organ of white supremacisism known as Commentary magazine. 

But for mainstream conservative, why ask difficult, complicated questions when you can simply thump one’s chest for being really, really PC? Why admit that Wright might have a few interesting things to say when one can simply bash, bash, bash away for John McCain?

The NRO crew seems to have many uses for Charles Murray: a few weeks ago, they allowed him on “The Corner” as the one person who actually liked Obama’s speech on race—they then used him as a punching bag. Now they bring him back, for the same purpose. 


Comments

Richard,
This is an obviously post-paleo commentary, including the snide reference to “mainstream
conservatives.” I thought that was my shtik.

Eminem can rap.

No one denies that race in some form exists, after all if it didn’t we would all look alike.  Perhaps race is nothing more than a group of people living in a geographic area for such a period of time that they start to look different, but it still is real and tangible. 

But what worries me is those who will use race as an -all-the-time factor in how they deal with people, without looking at an individual.  This attitude of lumping people into groups is what both mainstream liberals and, sadly, many paleocons do.

For example, one thing many white supremacists will use as “proof” that lighter people are genetically better than darks is the fact that dark people in Africa were still in tribal stages while Europeans were very advanced when they made contact with those tribes of lower Africa.  Problem with that theory is that the regions we call the British Isles were also stone-age tribes when the Roman’s came over, so are the White supremacists going to admit that Mediterranean folk are better by blood than those living on the western edges of the European continent?  And what does one make of North versus South American Indians, where in the North the best ruins we have are the canyon brick towns, while in the South and Central America we had giant cities of stone and Astronomers?  Also how does one square Cambodian Ancient Angkor with nearby people who were much less developed.

Clearly race and Culture do not go hand-in-hand, and I do not think we will ever know what factors and mixture of factors leads a man in a cave from sticks and loin clothes to making roads, stone monuments and agriculture

Posted by jerry on Apr 28, 2008.

Click to flag this comment as abusive

Intelligence is multifactorial.  Consider the hypothetical scenario that 5 distinct skills are required to complete an intelligence test, i.e. visual reasoning, language, etc.  Now consider that one particular group of people may lack one of these five skills, and that despite good performance in the other four categories, their performance in one area drags the overall score down.  This situation, to some extent, exists in the IQ testing world.  The factor that when removed mostly equalizes the IQ test between ethnic groups is called “g.” This explains why an African American with an “IQ” of 80 can work circles around the typical white individual with an IQ of 80:  for the white individual the IQ of 80 may represent a global brain dysfunction whereas for the AA the IQ of 80 (which is near their average) may represent poor performance in only one skill: “g.” The impetus is on psycho-metrics researchers to identify core skills, to develop tests for these core skills, and then to associate the core skill with career types.  For example, “g” may only be required for a handful of jobs (physics, physician, business strategist), and for many other positions other testable skills would be more germane.  In a multi-cultural society we need better evaluation tools to prevent unfair discrimination against both minority and majority.  Having fair testing would also help bring many intelligent, though scorned, individuals out of the shadows of racist groups.  Any comment on this?

Posted by Joe on Apr 28, 2008.

Click to flag this comment as abusive

Clearly, race and culture do go hand in hand. Whites act more like other Whites and leave civilization that are very similar to Whites in places like South America, North America, Africa, and Asia. And it goes the other way as well. Why Race by Michael Levin is a good introduction to the topic http://www.amren.com/store/why_race_matters.html
And race is more than just intelligence. Race is about many things including physical prowess, athletic ability, time preference, and a whole host of other attributes http://www.harbornet.com/folks/theedrich/JP_Rushton/Race.htm
I would suggest people grab the literature and the references of the Bell Curve and do more investigating. There is too much racial fantasy among the people who comment at this website.

Eminem is the exception that proves the rule.

Posted by brian on Apr 29, 2008.

Click to flag this comment as abusive

I never thought I would read a veiled reference to T-Good (Taveres Goodwin) on Takimag.

I would say that culture, and particularly it’s religious and moral aspects, trump race every time.

Race is probably the easiest of the three to see, but it can be argued that it’s the least important.

The ancient Greeks used pentatonic systems a lot, as do Bretons.

The Arabs also use non-European tone scales.  Perhaps it is cultural, and not inherited.

Subterranean Homesick Blues...Bob Dylan...pretty good rap don’t ya think?

White people don’t suck at rapping...they just don’t bother practicing it all day everyday..and the ones that do, are as good as anyone. Blacks don’t suck at golfing, they just don’t spend all day everyday practicing it. And the ones that do are as good as anyone.

Follow the money trail!....Nothing happens in politics accidently. Who is the publisher of the reverand’s book? Who controls publishing in the U.S.?....Who stands to make the most out of a useful idiot? Unlike McAmnesty and Hillary , who is not quite committed to bombing everyone in the middleast? Who want’s a “PRO LOBBY” election between McCain and Hillary?....I can almost hear the LOBBY manipulating “Wright” in the form of a book publisher!.....All knows that IRAN is toast whether it be McAmnesty or Hillary?

Posted by roho on Apr 29, 2008.

Click to flag this comment as abusive

If “Rap” is not a feature most would associate with a high culture, we should count our blessings that we “suck” in its performance.

Common sense, and worldly experience should tell one that race and other categorizations such as ethnicity, tribalism, etc., are real. I have lived and worked with and among the different races and nationalities over several decades. Except for Europeans and East Asians, most of the world’s people use logic in the sense that a pseudo chain is developed to “prove” what they desire. Listen to Rev. Wright and you will hear the cascading nonsequiters.  Aristotle’s formalizing of rules do not apply.

Many universal values which are esteemed in the West are absent. What is valued are one’s interests of the moment. Experience with latin cultures for example will frequently reveal outright denial or lies - all to preserve their sense of worth and machismo.  Raphael Palmeiro is a good example. In their culture, this is not unexpected conduct.

I have frequently observed minorities here exhibiting superior tactical skills, but lacking in any strategic sense. And their world view does not even consider the possibility that reality might exist on levels beyond their comprehension. That is why it almost always reverts to a formulation of someone conspiring to damage them.  Different cultures, different DNA, differences.

LOL roho. I knew some idiot would bring “the Lobby” into this!

Posted by fred on Apr 29, 2008.

Click to flag this comment as abusive

Another self appointed black cracker
is the Rev. Wright
De way he dis whitey is outta sight
Ya all go church on Sunday
get down on your knees an’ pray
Old Rev. Wright passes the plate
and says son, how much will you pay?
Now he be a star, eclipsin’ Obama
kickin’ it wif the press club,
you don’ like it, yo mama
He be damning dis he be damning dat, yall got ta admit he be one
damn cool cat

Posted by Brown on May 01, 2008.

Click to flag this comment as abusive

This is really too funny for words.  The fact that anyone could even begin to talk seriously for a moment about something called “rap music”, an oxymoron if ever there was one, says a lot about how low we have sunk.

I would correct this Wright fellow on one point:  the non-European music of the jungle he extols does not use only those five notes he refers to.  In fact, it only uses three, endlessly repeated.  Anyone whose ears have been caressed by the enchanting sounds of a passing boombox will tell you that.

Interesting comments plus a large collection of pseudo-intellectual gibberish. May I just add that
while Northern Europeans had to be taught by the Roman empire how to organise, build and create
a modern state. Guess who taught the Romans, the Greeks. who taught the Greeks, the Egyptians and
from there… Nubians, Adulis, Great Zimbabwe. The flow of knowledge was northwards, just as the flow
of technical development was southwards. Different societies grow at different times and at different
rates. Like kids in a classroom. The responsibility that comes with knowledge is more important than
the bragging rights that many people espouse.

Fred,

If we were able to examine your own hidden agenda before deciding whether you or roho is the idiot I think you would deserve that dubious distinction.

Posted by Bob D on May 02, 2008.

Click to flag this comment as abusive

Post a Comment

By submitting this form, you give Taki's Magazine permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. Personal attacks, ethnic slurs, the riding of hobby horses and the beating of dead ones will be deleted as soon as they are detected by our small but alert staff. Repeat abusers of this policy will be barred from leaving comments. All comments reflect only the views of those posting them and not necessarily those of this website, its editors, or authors. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.

Commenting is not available in this section entry.