Strip-search the Brits
The immigration protest march this week gave me some food for thought. There are 800,000 British passport holders who can at any time come to the United States without a visa or subject to any controls. These Brits are all either Pakistani born and naturalized British subjects, or their sons or grandsons. Pakistani Britons travel to their ancestral land of Pakistan around—get this—400,000 times per year. 400,000 trips are taken each year by Britons of Pakistani descent who are then free to arrive in the U.S. unmolested and uncontrolled and do their stuff. Jihadist ideology is the prevailing ideology of young, disillusioned Pakistanis in Britain, turned off by what they see as loose morals and all round decadence of the West. America is to them the great Satan. So let’s get one thing straight. Before we have another 9/11, all Britons—Pakistani or as English as the Queen—should come under watertight scrutiny when visiting our shores. It’s the price the Brits have to pay for not having listened to Enoch Powell back in the Sixties when he warned about the perils of multiculturalism.




Comments
I think the British govt. has already
done a good job of “stripping” the Brits.
You can easily spot them in public;
they have a paranoid tick and are always
looking over their shoulder.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Your observations are unfortunate. There are hundreds of thousands of Britons of Pakistani descent who are loyal hard-working citizens of a country they admire. There is no ‘prevailing ideology’ of jihad, just as there is no prevailing ideology of Christo-facsim in the US in spite of such loonies as Boykin declaring their religion to be ‘superior’—whatever that means. There are countless people of Pakistani origin who consider themselves, quite justifiably, just as British as Her Majesty, whose ancestors, of course, were themselves immigrants.
For once, Mr Theodoracopulos, you have got it wrong.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
I don’t think so mr Cloughley. Not only the Dutch and French also the Brits are beefing up their security as fast as possible. The Brits already suffered 50 deaths. There have been none -NONE- unequivocal massive renunciations of islamic terror by muslims à la the antiwar demonstrations in Amsterdam and London. NONE. The majority of the muslims is waiting to see who will win, silently (blood lines and all that) *hoping* that “their boys” will...The muslim mind is as yet not really integrated. Voting BNP or UKIP is a must for Britons!
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Voting isn’t going to solve the problems facing Europe and North America. I’m afraid the situation is going to require taking up arms. Just as Africans and Asians resorted to violence to oust whites from colonies in the ‘50s - ‘70s, Westerners must use force to liberate our countries from the Multi-Cult / Third World occupier. Mark my words here, gentlemen, violence works and therefore a World War of Liberation from Multicultiralism is what is needed to save the West.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
As an Englishman - not a “Brit” - I can add no more to
William Myers excellent summary of our present
situation.
Taki, of course, is right as usual.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
re mr. cloughley’s remarks:it is not a question of whether or not there are hundreds of thousands of people of islamic culture who are loyal to Britain or not but whether there is reason to believe that there are tens of thousands who are not.One does not advocate leaving one’s doors and windows open because most people are not criminals.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
As a Brit of Caribbean descent (the Islands my parents
were born in were British colonies, hence they were
British citizens when they arrived here in the UK in the
1950’s) I have to say that I agree with Taki.
The problem with UK immigration policy is that there
is too much emphasis on Political Correctness.
For example, in the mid 1990’s just before Hong Kong
was due to be handed over to mainland China there
were a great many ‘fear stories’ of 100000 British
passport holders coming to the UK. Yet during the same
period many more Somalis and other East Africans have
come to Britain and barely a word has been uttered.
One must ask why there was a fear of Hong Kong Chinese?
They are a successful people, hard working,
industrious, intelligent, civilised and their average
IQ’s are amongst the highest in the world. These are
precisely the people the UK NEEDS! Yet they were turned
away. The twisted of ‘morality’ of UK immigration policy states boldly that productive people are BAD and unproductive people are GOOD. I must say this also includes the bulk of Caribbean people who came to Britain. My parents are of the light brown-skinned middle class stock but many who came here were illiterate and innumerate and have shown a propensity to be disproportionately represented in the criminal fraternity as well as living in government subsidised (read taxpayer subsidised) social housing.
I do have to take issue with the comments of some of the posters here though. Firstly understand that ungrateful minorities are not solely the ‘white mans burden’. In India the peaceful industrious Hindu majority has had to put up with insolence from minorities (particularly Muslims) for years. As one Hindu priest said “we honour our minorities, but they don’t honour us”. They finally snapped in the late 1990’s when they elected the Right-wing BJP! Bahamians and French Caribbean don’t like wretched Haitians washing up on their shores either.
Secondly the BNP is certainly not a Right-wing party. The BNP is socially patriotic and nationalist (and racist) but its economic policies are avowedly anti-capitalist Left-wing. To those of you who think that you cant be patriotic / nationalist (and racist) and Left-wing, just look at the Khmer Rouge and Robert Mugabe’s ZANU-PF party.
A protest vote is best spent on a genuine Right-wing nationalist party, the only one we have presently is UKIP.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
I suggest that if we are going to start strip searching travelers because they might possess “radical thought”, perhaps we should start with you, Mr T.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Dear Mr. William Meyers (and the snooty “Brit” St.Georgeiscross):
Your remarks suggest you haven’t smelled war, especially the civil type. Besides, your remarks seem a bit scatterbrained.
First of all, my opinion: the Brits deserve what they get—and got, a country full of “foreigners,” that is. The Brits in essence brought them to their country; they didn’t sneak in on their own (like Mexicans). Had the Brits not have insisted on having their empire and brought such terrible suffering to the poor people they colonized and pillaged, they would have a country full of Stanis right now. Dance around it all you want, but it’s true.
Secondly, I’d think twice before making a call to arms if I were you. You guys have quite a few foreigners there and those people tend to be some tough mothers – at least, more so than the pink-fingered English. Best watch out, you “Englishman” might just get you’re asses kicked. Of course, it would be the first time – in fact, you guys are making quite a habit of it.
--An Irishman
Click to flag this comment as abusive
AH, “emon”, thanks for giving me something to laugh at over my mid-morning tea! When
I hear “An Irishman” (no relation to “Mrs ANN Elk” of the Monty Python skit) dribble words like yours, reeking of stale beer:
“...Had the Brits not have insisted on having their empire and brought such terrible suffering to the poor people they colonized...”
...then I remember this bit in George Orwell’s essay, “Notes On Nationalism” (1946):
“If one harbours anywhere in one’s mind a nationalistic loyalty or hatred, certain facts, although in a sense known to be true, are inadmissible. Here are just a few examples:...IRISH NATIONALIST: Eire can only remain independent because of British protection.”
http://whitewolf.newcastle.edu.au/words/authors/O/OrwellGeorge/essay/nationalism.html
Click to flag this comment as abusive
While I can see how some might get a “kick” out of seeing england get invaded, fact is if you are in Europe YOUR country will be next. Ireland fought long and hard for its own nation and now it may loose it once again. This time to a huge influx of immigration.
When I was in Dublin a lot of the hotel staff was African. The rest were Polish. I didn’t meet one Irishman in the city, although I did meet many outside the city.
Something to think about.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Mr. John Ball:
Thank you for returning the opportunity to chuckle. So I guess your argument is “if we Brits hadn’t invaded and occupied your country someone else would have” and “we Brits were protecting you Irish from someone else, other than us Brits, from pillaging you.”
For this I suppose we Irish should thank you Brits? Typical tired old imperial twaddle. Fact is you did wrong by any objective standard and got what you deserved here too – and will eventually get what you deserve in the North as well.
Meantime, your chickens have come home to roost in Londonistan. The British population is taking on a nice tan.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
I see emon, like myself, prefers to be known by his true ethnic identity - in his case, Irish. However, an Englishman referring to his English origin is somehow “snooty” - a common hypocrisy amongst foreigners in England.
A less easy to understand confusion among England’s detractors is whether the English comprise a country of limp-wristed nancy boys (pink fingered?) - or
brutal oppressors. Perhaps emon can help me on this one.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Emon,
My thinking on this matter is quite clear. I advocate violence and force to liberate our countries from the Multi-Cult and its foreign immigrant-invader shock-troops. Voting, democracy, and debate aren’t going to free us. Force is the answer. Civilisation requires force and violence if it is to survive. Violence works.
Brits, Europeans, and Americans have NOT invited the masses of non-whites that now occupy our countries, nor have we advocated the anti-white Multiculturalism and diversity programs that now pollute our culture, media, and schools. These have been forced on us, i.e. without our consent. They are therefore illegal and illegitimate, and need to be expelled or eradicated, by any means necessary.
Just as African and Asian nationalist movements used force and violence to oust white colonials from the Third World in the 1950s to the 1980s, whites must use similar methods to liberate our countries, restore our civilisation, and protect our children in our own countries.
I realise my ideas are beyond the pale, outside the current boundaries of polite discourse, but violence and force are the only things that can save us. In time, you and others like you will see it my way. Our ancestors fought innumerable wars. It is the height arrogance and foolishness to assume that modern Western Man will never have to fight a war to protect his own land, civilisation, and people ever again.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Not too long ago in England, it was common for the news media to conduct periodically opinion poles to determine the view of the population concerning mass immigration into the country. The results never varied - being overwhelmingly against. The government’s response was to outlaw further poles as being “racist” by the very nature of the question being asked.
William Myers solution is not beyond the pale. History has shown that violence works. In most cases, it is the only thing that works. If you love something enough - you either defend it - or you lose it. This is not just the lesson of history, this is the general rule of nature itself.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Dear Mr. St.Georgeiscross:
You pose the question:
“…whether the English comprise a country of limp-wristed nancy boys (pink fingered?) - or brutal oppressors. [?]“
The answer is both. History testifies that the Brits are in fact brutal oppressors who have wreaked all manor of death, destruction, torture, mutilation, exploitation and suffering on your colonial peoples. That is when you guys have the guns and the wogs have spears.
However, when confronted with an enemy equal in strength and arms, well Brits behave a little differently. It’s actually embarrassing to watch. Pathetic fidgeting pale men with smug attitudes and bad teeth feigning dignity while trying suck up to those they fear. And, ultimately, when arms clash Brits end up on the losing side as often as not. Certainly no impressive track record.
If, as you asserted earlier (above), England protected Ireland from invasion by others (a fantasy), then by analogy the case is made that the U.S. is England’s protector – bailing Brit out of messes when it gets in over its head.
So, there you have it: not only girlie men, but smug hypocrites to boot. Just thinking about it makes you want to bitch-slap an “Englishman” and make him your girlfriend.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Posted by William Myers on May 08, 2007.
Mr. William Meyers:
Please don’t construe my comments to in any way dignify or take serious those of your own. Indeed, to say your call to arms in the service of eradicating the immigrant elements of your country is beyond the pale is an understatement.
But I’m curious, isn’t it illegal in the U.K. to make such statements. Is it not some sort of incitement of violence or hate crime or glorification of terrorism, or something? Can you guys even own guns?
As a practical matter I fail to understand how you propose going about this in the first place. Should “Englishmen” just start shooting down wogs in the street or what? Or, would there be a coup or insurrection? But, you guys are socialists, so how would it work?
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Maybe you, ahem, “Englishmen” can do for your wog neighborhoods in Londonistan what you did for wogs in Iraq in the 20’s in Iraq: drop chemical weapons on them, burn the villages, and bayonet the wounded. Surely you have some Gertrude Bell’s around who cheer lead the effort.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Emon,
Maybe I didn’t make myself clear before. I wholeheartedly advocate the use of force and violence, without restraint, to take back our countries, restore our civilisation, and protect our families and children. I make no apologies for this.
As an Irish nationalist, perhaps you can understand the viability of using violence to achieve political and military aims?
You and others like you are behind the curve. You are still stuck in the old paradigm, where you cling to your naive faith in debate, dialogue, and democracy. But you are wasting your time. The current power elites do not want debate. They do not want democracy. They fear it.
Rest assured, conflict is inevitable. When your back is against the wall, you don’t start a dialogue. You fight. Survival demands action. In time, the invasion of the West will produce its own counterreaction.
I am in touch with several patriotic groups across Britain and Europe, many with ties to state security forces and with caches of resources throughout the continent, who are preparing to act, when the time is right. As the current power elites continue in their fear to crack down on critics and opponents of the Multi-Cult, and as the security/social situation continues to deteriorate, opportunities for patriots to act will present themselves. It is only a matter of time.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
What I find most shocking about some of the comments on this page is the standard of spelling and grammar they contain.
If kicking out the rag-heads can secure the future of our country (I am English), what can we do about the Mick and the Yank’s massacre of our language?
Knowing my luck, and although I have checked this comment twice, I have probably made some howler.
Oh, and as for the chap who thinks we will get our ‘asses kicked’...I live in the country (Dorset) and all my friend’s have donkeys...will they get kicked too? I think the RSPCA should be forewarned.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Dear Mr. Meyers:
I must be frank. Reading your post gave me a chill. I retract my remark made in a previous post about not taking your comments seriously: After reading your last post I think I now do take you seriously. This of course raises serious concerns for me.
Your comments sound dangerously close to a literal call for rebellion and insurrection. This is something I do NOT support. You allusions to “patriotic groups,” “ties to security forces,” and “caches of resources” raises a terrifying specter of some fascistic revolutionary world that I hope to never see.
You seem consumed with fear and hatred and have probably lost touch with your faculties of reason, objectivity and balance. I seriously question your mental state.
Please consider this: Utopia is not an option. In life, black and white are only found at the extremes, all the rest are shades of gray. I suggest you try to draw on your Christianity, particularly the Christian virtues of patience, charity, justice, hope, generosity, kindness, and, most of all, humility. God help you.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Dear Mr. Meyers:
I must be frank. Reading your post gave me a chill. I retract my remark made in a previous post about not taking your comments seriously: After reading your last post I think I now do take you seriously. This of course raises serious concerns for me.
Your comments sound dangerously close to a literal call for rebellion and insurrection. This is something I do NOT support. You allusions to “patriotic groups,” “ties to security forces,” and “caches of resources” raises a terrifying specter of some fascistic revolutionary world that I hope to never see.
You seem consumed with fear and hatred and have probably lost touch with your faculties of reason, objectivity and balance. I seriously question your mental state. You should cease and disavow your perilous behavior immediately before you hurt someone or get in trouble.
Please consider this: Utopia is not an option. In life, black and white are only found at the extremes, all the rest are shades of gray. I suggest you try to draw on your Christianity, particularly the Christian virtues of patience, charity, justice, hope, generosity, kindness, and, most of all, humility. May God help you.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Dear Mr. Meyers:
I must be frank. Reading your post gave me a chill. I retract my remark made in a previous post about not taking your comments seriously: After reading your last post I think I now do take you seriously. This of course raises serious concerns for me.
Your comments sound dangerously close to a literal call for rebellion and insurrection. This is something I do NOT support. You allusions to “patriotic groups,” “ties to security forces,” and “caches of resources” raises a terrifying specter of some fascistic revolutionary world that I hope to never see.
You seem consumed with fear and hatred and have probably lost touch with your faculties of reason, objectivity and balance. I seriously question your mental state. You should immediately cease and disavow your perilous and insane behavior before you hurt someone or get into deep trouble. And seek help now, before it’s too late.
Please consider this: Utopia is not an option. In life, black and white are only found at the extremes, all the rest are shades of gray. I suggest you try to draw on your Christianity, particularly the Christian virtues of patience, charity, justice, hope, generosity, kindness, and, most of all, humility. May God help you.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
All this talk about the “third-world invasion of Europe” is awkward, but far more awkward (and far more relevant) is this simple fact: people of European descent no longer reproduce enough to sustain their population.
The “guest workers” are coming for a reason, and the reason is that without them europe would be emptying. There’s no good reason to blame africans for that, now, is there? It’s one thing to criticise their habits and beliefs, but when the West isn’t even optimistic enough to bear children, how do we even have room to talk?
I think that the reason Europeans no longer procreate is that they are addled with guilt and confusion in the godless world they have constructed for themselves.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
“Maybe you, ahem, “Englishmen” can do for your wog neighborhoods in Londonistan what you did for wogs in Iraq in the 20’s in Iraq: drop chemical weapons on them, burn the villages, and bayonet the wounded.”
emon,
Assuming you are over 12 years old, you should know that the general population of any country has little or no control over the machinations of its government.
The “Englishmen” you describe above, were no more representative of the native population than to-days generation are. The present government is doing the exact same thing in Iraq (and elsewhere) today as it did then - except this time as the willing poodle of Bush. The stated will of the population, as usual, being contemptuously brushed aside.
The inevitable fight against the present invasion of England, could not be more different. It will be morally right and necessary - as it effects the wellbeing of the indigenous population directly.
An example that even you, emon, may be able to grasp: the wholly legitimate violent struggle for Irish independence from English Government rule. The ordinary Englishman, by the way, could not have cared less - there never having been the slightest threat from Ireland to him or his family. However, violence won out - and to all intents the IRA succeeded. Go ask Jerry Adams (MP) - I’m about through.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Dear Mr. Meyers:
I must be frank. Reading your post gave me a chill. I retract my remark made in a previous post about not taking your comments seriously: After reading your last post I think I now do take you seriously. This of course raises serious concerns.
Your comments sound dangerously close to a literal call for rebellion and insurrection. This is something I do NOT support. You allusions to “patriotic groups,” “ties to security forces,” and “caches of resources” raises the terrifying specter of some fascistic revolutionary world that I hope to never see.
I’m afraid you’re deeply disturbed. You seem consumed with fear and hatred and have probably lost touch with your faculties of reason, objectivity and rationality. You really should seek help now, before it’s too late. And, obviously, you should immediately cease with and disavow your perilous and insane rantings before you get into deep trouble, or worse, someone gets hurt.
Mr. Meyers, please consider this: Utopia is not an option. In life, black and white are only found at the extremes, all else are shades of gray. I suggest you try to find solace in your Christianity, particularly the Christian virtues of patience, charity, justice, hope, generosity, kindness, and, most of all, humility. May God help you.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
“Maybe you, ahem, “Englishmen” can do for your wog neighborhoods in Londonistan what you did for wogs in Iraq in the 20’s in Iraq: drop chemical weapons on them, burn the villages, and bayonet the wounded.”
emon,
Assuming you are over 12 years old - you should know that the general population of any country has little or no control over the machinations of its government.
The “Englishmen” you describe above, were no more representative of the native population than to-days generation are. The present government is doing the exact same thing in Iraq (and elsewhere) today as it did then - except this time as the willing poodle of Bush. The stated will of the population, as usual, being contemptuously brushed aside.
The inevitable fight against the present invasion of England, could not be more different. It will be morally right and necessary - as it effects the wellbeing of the indigenous population directly.
An example that even you, emon, may be able to grasp: the wholly legitimate violent struggle for Irish independence from English Government rule. The ordinary Englishman, by the way, could not have cared less - there never having been the slightest threat from Ireland to him or his family. However, violence won out - and to all intents the IRA succeeded. Go ask Jerry Adams (MP) - I’m about through.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
If someone is willing to use violence to defend their culture then it is better if you wear a disguise, a white sheet and hood will do. It is advisable to use a fantastic sounding name, Grand Wizard sounds good.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
“emon”, for someone who writes such provocative screeds which would warrant your getting into an old-fashioned Donnybrook fistfight if you ever said those
words to any Englishman in person, you’re pretty f---ing cowardly in posting all of your shit under a pseudonym instead of under your own true name.
My name is John Donald Ball III. And I’m one fourth Irish - but unlike you, “emon-the-anonymous”, the valour of my Irish ancestors has never been bred out of me. So, what the hell happened to YOU, “emon”, to breed the courageous Irish blood out of you and turn you into a cowardly little shit?
Click to flag this comment as abusive
To “emon” the anonymous, who doesn’t have the balls to post under his own true name:
For someone who posts such aggressive screeds, baiting all of us sons of England to tangle with you if we could meet you in person, you’re pretty damned cowardly to post it all without posting your real name.
My name is John Donald Ball III, and my grandmother was Irish. So, “emon”, the difference between me and you, is that that valour of our ancient Irish people was never bred out of me, as it evidently has been bred or perhaps beaten out of you. And I think it was beaten out of you by your own hands.
I don’t provoke any fights that I’m not willing to fight in person. But YOU do, “emon” the anonymous, and so you have proved that there is absolutely nothing Irish in you at all.
The Irish are an ancient race of proud, courageous warriors who fight and live and die for the honour of their own names. You, “emon-the-anonymous”, are not one of them.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
“There are countless people of Pakistani origin who consider themselves, quite justifiably, just as British as Her Majesty,...” Absurd! Does being English mean so little? If, as a White, I was to learn Chinese, move to China, gain Chinese citizenship (probably next to impossible), and then tell everyone who asked that I was “Chinese”, they’d look at me as if I was nuts, and rightly so. Nations have heritages bound inextricably with specific demographic identities, also rightly so. When anyone can be anything, then everyone is nothing. Do we really want to live in a world where a Pakistani can be called an ‘Englishman’?
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Post a Comment
By submitting this form, you give Taki's Magazine permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. Personal attacks, ethnic slurs, the riding of hobby horses and the beating of dead ones will be deleted as soon as they are detected by our small but alert staff. Repeat abusers of this policy will be barred from leaving comments. All comments reflect only the views of those posting them and not necessarily those of this website, its editors, or authors. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.
Commenting is not available in this section entry.