The Ron Paul Revolution Hits Sproul Plaza
I just returned from a Ron Paul for President rally at the University of California at Berkeley, and I have to tell you that it was quite an experience. Here we were in Sproul Plaza, the historic epicenter of campus protest, with nary a sign of politics of any sort except for the Campus Democrats desultorily manning their literature table. Students hurried by, on their way to class, or lounged unconcerned in the sun, eating lunch. The Ron Paul kids numbered some 100, and they mobilized in the middle of the plaza, with their signs, loud and brash. For the benefit of my readers at Takimag.com, I would add that a great many of the young Paulistas were Asian-American. I spoke to one young member, of the Ron Paull Meet-up group, a South Asian immigrant, who told me that he had never wanted to apply for citizenship, because politics to him did not matter: citizenship meant jury duty, and that’s about it. Now that the Ron Paul Revolution is in progress, however, he is applying for citizenship—so he can vote for Ron. Anti-immigrant Takimag readers can make of that what they will....
My remarks at the rally follow:
We are here today not only to rally for Ron Paul, but to protest a war even as yet another war looms large on the horizon. The occupation of Iraq is in its fifth year – and the administration, with lots of help from Hillary Clinton, is ginning up a major confrontation with Iran.
For five years – longer than the time it took to fight World War II – our rulers have been telling us that “victory” is right around the corner. That all we need do is suspend our better judgement, have faith in their infinite wisdom, and “support our troops” by blindly going along with the War Party’s agenda.
The same crowd of war-at-any price fanatics, known as the neoconservatives, are up to their own tricks once again. We’re hearing the same song-and-dance about “weapons of mass destruction,” and America’s alleged duty to police the Middle East – and, of course, they’re telling us that Israel must be protected, no matter what the consequences for American and America’s national interests.
They lied us into war in Iraq, and now they’re telling us that we must go to war with Iran – because the Iranians are “interfering” in Iraq.
Make no mistake about it, this war is spreading: what we are witnessing is the prelude to what the neocnservatives hope will be a new world war, one that will give them the chance to extend the conflict to the entire Middle East – and clamp down on the home front, where the peasants – that’s you and me! – are getting restless.
The War Party consists of Democrats as well as Republicans: indeed, without the Democrats, they couldn’t have pulled off the invasion and conquest of Iraq, and the two parties are colluding to lure us into a shooting war with Iran. If the Clinton restoration is a fact by next year, we’ll be at war no matter who is in the White House.
Trillions of dollars, tens of thousands of lives, a worldwide economic dislocation due to the disruption of oil markets – this is what we have to look forward to. Americans voted to end the war in the last elections – and yet the war is escalating. What does that tell you about the state of democracy in America?
There’s just one way to get the War Party out of power: mass protests. We must build a single issue coalition that encompasses left and right, liberals and conservatives, people of every party and viewpoint, all united around opposition to imperialism. This coalition is now taking shape around the candidacy of Ron Paul.
It’s interesting how history is repeating itself, these days, but with a twist: a candidate comes out of the grassroots. He faces a bipartisan Establishment that is dedicated to the three overriding principles of Washington politics, no matter which party we’re talking about: big money, big government, and big subsides for the biggest, most powerful interest groups. We have a candidate who offers a choice, not an echo, who calls Americans back to the founding principles of this country: the concept of constitutionally limited government and a foreign policy based on peace and the wisdom of minding our own business. We have, in short, an authentic libertarian, one who harkens back to such Republican stalwarts as Robert A. Taft and even Dwight David Eisenhower, whose prescient warning against the power of the military-industrial complex went unheeded by his fellow Republicans. And we have a “mainstream” media that is hopelessly biased against anyone who doesn’t fit into their predetermined categories, who is real, and lives by the principles he espouses – indeed, who is motivated by those principles and cares about little else.
The last time such a candidate appeared on the scene, he rose from relative obscurity to become a hero and symbol of youthful rebellion, who challenged the Powers That Be and a gaggle of pale imitation “moderates,” and mounted a campaign that basically set the stage for the modern antiar movement and the radical upsurge of the 1960s. His name was Eugene McCarthy.
Almost half a century later, the Establishment is once again facing a challenge from a maverick, an upstart who dares to point to his party’s betrayal of its principles, and seeks to revive a movement that has turned into the exact opposite of what it used to be: a crusade for limited government that, somehow, got sidetracked into becoming an all-out assault on the Constitution and what is left of our civil liberties. Like McCarthy, he is a maverick and a man of high principle who has stood like a rock against the temper of the times, and swum against the current of his own party in upholding his deep skepticism of government “solutions,” and has justly earned the sobriquet “Dr. No” because he has no trouble voting against most of the nonsense that passes for legislation at the federal level.
His name is Ron Paul.
He is the rightful heir of a party that once stood for individual rights, and a peaceful, prudent foreign policy based on the pursuit of American interests. A party that has since lost its way.
It’s sad, really, to see the decline of a once great party: a party that has presided over the biggest expansion of government since the Great Society of Lyndon Johnson, the biggest explosion of federal spending in modern times, and the most serious assault on our constitutional liberties since the imposition of the Alien and Sedition Acts in 1798. Here is a party that once stood for decentralized government asserting the theory of presidential supremacy. Here is a doctrine that so exaggerates the power of the executive branch of government that it becomes a monstrous growth of precisely the same sort feared by the Founders, who warned against the return of royalism to America.
How did this happen? How is it that the so-called conservatives of today advocate precisely the opposite of what they advocated yesterday? How has the dream of a free America turned into the nightmare of the Homeland Security State, where government can search our homes, read our email, spy on our legal and constitutionally protected activities, all without a warrant or even a nod to anything remotely resembling a legal procedure?
Ron Paul clearly sees the key to all this, and that is why he has staked out a position as the foremost opponent of militarism in the US Congress. Our interventionist foreign policy is the motor that drives the engine of Big Government, and its fuel is the sort of war hysteria that has permeated political life since the 9/11 terrorist attacks and led to our present predicament in Iraq. Ron Paul stands alone among the Republican candidates for president in opposing our immoral and horribly counterproductive invasion of Iraq. The idea that we can or should go into a foreign country, and “transform” it according to some grand design, to fit some preconceived made-in-Washington formula – to impose “democracy”, or what passes for it these days, at gunpoint on the people of the Middle East – is an idea that one might expect from a liberal Democrat, who, after all, has an abiding faith in the power of government to do … well, practically anything! One would think that Republicans, and especially those who fancy themselves conservative Republicans, would know better.
Unfortunately, these days, one would be very wrong to assume any such thing.
The Republican party has been hijacked, and transformed into its Bizarro World equivalent: the party that once fancied itself the party of individual liberty has become the party of Big Brother.
In reminding Republicans of their lost heritage, in reviving the spirit of 1964, in offering a choice not an echo of the big government conservative cant that has dominated the party for the past eight years, Ron Paul is the conscience of the GOP. Will the party listen to its conscience, or will it continue to sin against its own traditions? Only time will tell. But I’ll tell you this.
The pundits are saying that Ron Paul hasn’t got a chance. He’s an outsider, a maverick, a second-tier nobody – how could he possibly win the party’s nomination for the highest office in the land? Well, I don’t know the precise answer to that question, and I won’t pretend that I do, but I do know this: once before, the know-it-all columnists and the party kingmakers, decided that a representative of true conservatism couldn’t possibly get the nomination. In 1964, Rockefeller – and, yes, another Romney, by the name of George – were the frontrunners, deemed so by the mainstream media and the political mavens. Yet Goldwater came from behind, his support welling up from the grassroots: he inspired thousands of activists, who were brought into the freedom movement by his passionate rhetoric and obvious authenticity.
They said the same thing about Eugene McCarthy – that he couldn’t win, that his supporters were a “childrens’ crusade,” and that a vote for him was a wasted vote: only the Establishment-approved candidates had a real chance of winning, and the game is rigged in advance.
In both instances, the so-called “experts” were proven wrong. McCarthy broke the back of the War Party’s control of the Democrats: Goldwater defeated his party’s bosses outright, and went on to take the nomination. In both cases, an insurgent took on the party Establishment, defied the odds, and won an intellectual and moral victory.
Is history repeating itself? There are many indications that Ron Paul’s campaign has the potential to change the face of American politics – and this rally is one such indication. But the naysayers are out in force, because they have too much invested in the intellectual and political status quo to let Ron Paul’s challenge stand.
The success of the Paul campaign has generated a lot of interest – and a ferocious reaction from the traditional gate-keepers and guardians of “left” and “right”-wing orthodoxy. The so-called “left” – or, rather, the pathetic remnants of the sectarian left – has retreated into a sectarian shell, substituting the dead dogma of Marxism for the trendy-wendy cliches of identity politics and political correctness. They are suspicious of Ron Paul: after all, he’s a Republican – YIKES! He’s from Texas – double YIKES! And he’s an old white guy – OMIGOD! How could he possibly speak to us and our issues?
The so-called “right” side of the political spectrum is similarly invested in looking at the Paul campaign through the prism of traditional left-right politics. Paul is opposed to imperialism, he opposes the PATRIOT act and other obscene assaults on our liberties, and he even talks about that dead document that hardly anyone even remembers anymore, let alone takes seriously – the Constitution of the United States. He opposes our foreign policy of global intervention, and speaks out against the militarism that has infected every aspect of our once-free society. Why, he sounds like Noam Chomsky – how can he be one of us?
Both of these orthodoxies are as dead as a door-nail. In the face of the current crisis confronting us – an attempt by the War Party to impose a permanent state of conflict that will last for generations, and change our republican form of government forever – the old categories of “left” and “right” are worse than useless – they are outright insidious, and designed to divide the opposition.
The crisis is upon us, and we need to take extraordinary measures in order to save ourselves and what is left of our constitutional liberties. The War Party is seeking to open up a second front – this time, in Iran. And they are getting a free ride – and open complicity – from leading Democrats. If any of you expect the candidacy of Hillary Clinton to save you, I’m afraid you’re in for quite a shock. Hillary is more hawkish than the present administration when it comes to this question of preventing Iran from achieving nuclear parity with Israel. She has pledged to stop them – by whatever means necessary. Does anybody here think she won’t prove herself – that she won’t have to prove herself – by being even more macho than the most warmongering Republican?
No, the Democrats won’t save you, and the Left is utterly impotent: all they can do is call their little sectarian peace crawls and humbly beg the Democrats to please, please don’t’ take us to war again. All, I’m afraid, to no avail….
To honest liberals and progressives, who are looking for an alternative to sectarianism and despair. To honest conservatives who are looking to reclaim their heritage of individualism and economic and social freedom. To anyone and everyone searching for answers in a world with very few certainties except death and taxes: the candidacy of Ron Paul is a beacon in the darkness, the one hope we have to take back our country from the warmongers, the authoritarians, the scare-mongers who would use the tragedy of 9/11 to impose their agenda of perpetual conflict and centralized control. We are building a movement that rejects the tired, worn-out labels of left and right, liberal and conservative, blue state and red state – and seeks to forge a new paradigm that pits the new revolutionaries of liberty against the defenders of power and a militarized centralized state.
That is what the Paul campaign is all about. No wonder it’s taking off like a rocket. Now is the time to get on board, to defy the Powers That Be and reject the politics of the past. A future of freedom and peace is possible – if we are willing to fight for it.
Comments
In addition to our own homegrown Dr Ron Paul supporters, folks from all over the United States are coming into New Hampshire to campaign for Dr Paul in our Jan 9th primary election. We have to do all we can for him so that our freedoms can be restored and the insane wars can be stopped. At the Republican debate at UNH there were more supporters for Dr Paul than any other candidate, Huckabee was a close second, Romney third, and the rest had minimal support. I was particularly pleased to see that Guilianni had less than a handful of supporters. Let’s ignore the maimedstream media, win NH and go forward onto victory.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
“ignore the mainstream media”
definately
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Having grown up in Scandinavia, I have no difficulty in understanding why foreigners find Ron Paul attractive. A person familiar only with the US will find it hard to imagine a society where you have to ask some bureaucrat’s permission to do just about anything. Most foreigners are all to familiar with this condition. They know from personal experience where “compassionate conservatism” will lead and what Paul is opposing.
The freedom to do your own thing is the reason why foreigners find US so attractive. Many of them, however, do not know the US system well enough to understand the political origins of this freedom. Once this is explained to them, they will become solid supporters of Paul—just like the Berkeley Asians are now doing. (Just tell them that Paul wants to prevent the US from developing the same kind of a political system they have back home! This will work on anybody who has been in the US long enough to get over their ethnocentrism and understand the difference—that takes about two years.)
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Terrific essay Justin, please put it on your own website so it gets wide attention.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Although it did not occur to me before, I am not at all surprised to hear that Asian Americans are heavily represented in the ranks of Ron Paul supporters. It fits in well with the stereotype of Asian Americans being smart, techy, hard-working and business-savvy and at the same time traditional and family oriented.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
I never would have moved to Iowa and registered
repub. My concern is Paul’s movement came 20 years
too early. Who is going to take his place in congress.
He’s old after all, and near to retirement. And. . .
after the parties disintegrate who will be there to
pick up the pieces.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
I will take up arms, and fight....But not in Iran of the middle east the Neo Conservatives will get my attention.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
I am from Freiburg(homtown of F.v.Hayek), Germany and look with warm support and great happiness to the Ron Paul movement in Amerika.
Ron Paul must get President!
In my opinion, he is the last hope for all freedom loving people not only in USA but in the whole world!
Amerika and its warmongering and torturing establishment is not only hated and feared in Germany as never before, it is really despised.
That GeStaPo-methods could celebrate resurrection in Amerika after 60 years is uncredible!
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Ju-stin! Ju-stin! Ju-stin! :-)
Brilliant speech and I presume its delivery was as well. Hats off to you.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
i am from india...following the paul campaign very
closely. awesome speech mr.raimondo...its the kind that
rings in your head while you read it...america will always
be the beacon of hope to all freedom loving people all
over the world...a ron paul victory will change the world…
in a way none of these media idiots will ever understand…
Click to flag this comment as abusive
“Anti-immigrant Takimag readers can make of that what they will....”
Justin may disagree with the neocons on war, but he is in lockstep with them on immigration. I just saw Bill Kristol on Fox News tonight saying that we need more immigrants from Asia.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
This is not 1776. Get over it people. The die is cast, and the hammer WILL fall. Repent, for the end is nigh.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Ron Paul’s appeal is based on his ideas, not which ethnic club he belongs to. So, it does not surprise me that you saw a number of Asian-American students at the rally. Keep in mind, in places like CA, Japanese and Chinese families can stretch back 3 generations. In central CA, immigrants from Punjab first arrived in the early 20th century.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Justin, thank you for all that you do. Your own
efforts at spreading the message of peace and freedom
are greatly appreciated. I also have enjoyed your
kicking that racist Neiwert’s ass :)
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Justin,
There’s an interesting debate over on hnn (http://hnn.us/blogs/comments/45044.html#comment ), with one “libertarian” explaining that he can’t support Ron Paul because “in the long run, the young will never sign on to a movement rooted in cultural conservatism. Paul’s campaign is, in that sense, running a huge risk of long-term damage to libertarianism.”
Sounds as if “the young” are a little more mature than that self-proclaimed “progressive and cosmopolitan” libertarian over at hnn.
And, having married into an Asian family, I’m glad to hear that the Asian-Americans are coming on board. It seems to be hard for a lot of “progressive” pseudo-multiculturalist Americans to understand that culturally conservative values are actually a plus in the eyes of many Asians.
All the best,
Dave
Click to flag this comment as abusive
KXB,
An 18 year old (white) girl I knew was on a missionary trip to Punjab last year. She was raped by 6 East Indians, and 4 months later was diagnosed with HIV.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
randall- do you think KXB was one of them?
josef spitz- “Ron Paul must get President! “
I hope you don’t mind if i use that.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
My mother never went to college or read a political
science book. In fact, she has almost no understanding
of the political process. In her mind, elections are
like a game show. You vote in much the same way you
place a bet at the casino, you vote for the one you
expect to win. If you are right, you voted for the
winner....i.e. you won too. So my mother is keen to
discerrn which of the candidates is likely to WIN the
election, and that is the one she votes for.
I cannot say if this is the political ethos that is
shared by many people or not. I can say that none of
us know how many voters act in this way. (Maybe my
mother is just one of the few people to admit it.)
I had rather believe that people vote for the
candidate they want to win the election, whatever the
reason or rationale. I can recall being only one of
two voters that voted Democrat in my county in 1972.
(Yes, my candidate lost the election.) I prefer to
believe that an election is more like a public opinion
poll than a casino, which means that every vote is
important, not just the ones in the biggest pile. How
well a candidate does at the polls, sends a message
and defines the next election to a certain extent.
Even when a candidate loses an election, he may return
at the following election or, more likely, his message
will be carried like a banner in the next election.
That is why it is important for people to vote for
what they want and not try to guess who will actually
win. Battles are not always won by the biggest armies
and great nations do lose wars. Just causes and the
rights of man have often ended up carried high in the
air....on bayonet points.
I hope this is at all useful to Ron Paul.
Don Reynolds
Austin, Texas
Click to flag this comment as abusive
<<An 18 year old (white) girl I knew was on a missionary trip to Punjab last year. She was raped by 6 East Indians, and 4 months later was diagnosed with HIV.>>
What’s your point?
Click to flag this comment as abusive
It does not surprise me at all that Asian-Americans support Ron Paul Of those I’ve met (many), they are some of the most hard-working I’ve also met. Is it any wonder that they, too, wish to keep the fruits of their labor, they hard-working labor?!
Click to flag this comment as abusive
I wouldn’t think that any Takimag readers would have a problem with Asian Americans nor would Ron Paul. It is assumed that these individuals are legal immigrants and would oppose illegal immigration as much as any native Americans.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Also, great speech Justin. Here in New York Ron Paul’s candiacy is gaining momentum. When Ron Paul becomes president I suggest that we scrap this whole democracy experiment and make him king.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
A good speech Raimondo, nice job of responding to the lefty and righty wings of the disaffected Paul supporter by weving Goldwater and McCarthy into one speech....whoduthunk it would ever happen.
The country is best served by this separation of powers-philosophies etc and it is the conversation that is the strongest bulwark we have.
I do have an interesting vision of a long-shot Paul victory....he’s in the Oval Office on the night of his swearing in and the Neo-Jackson riff raff are going wild and a group of his lefty supporters anxiously barge into the office and after haling him as their new “King”, they breathlessly remind him all they did to get him elected and start going on and on about what they will now do and after a bit, Paul breaks in on their reveries and says
Yea, thanks alot, now go out and get a job”.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
“An 18 year old (white) girl I knew was on a missionary trip to Punjab last year. She was raped by 6 East Indians, and 4 months later was diagnosed with HIV.”
Okay - and how is this related to the topic at hand?
Click to flag this comment as abusive
If Rudy and McCain don’t like him then he’s ok in my book. Anything or anyone that f’s up the GOP Im for.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
David Miller, Lew Rockwell is looking for you at his website. He loves the blogging you are doing with the left libartarians. He is asking who is David Miller on his own blog.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Imagine the Limbaughs and the Kristols and Hannities
screetching that we’ll split the Elephant Drop Party
if we vote for “that other candidate.” So? What would
the outcome be from the split? The Donkey Drops would
win? So what? Not a dime’s worth of difference anymore.
I’m going to do what I couldn’t envision doing a year
ago - forking over hard cash - to Ron Paul’s candidacy.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
A fine speech, Justin. At the very least, Dr. Paul and his campaign, having already struck terror into the “hearts” of the neocon and Republican ‘establishment’, will go on to bring all these important issues to the attention of as many people as possible, in the probably vain hope that we can restore the federal republic and mind our own business at home.
Hats off to you and your fellow patriots at antiwar.com, to the folks at lewrockwell.com, and to the irrepressible Taki, who will, I trust, be with us for many more decades to come.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Remember that the 16th of december is a Ron Paul money bomb day. http://www.teaparty07.com If each of us gives a good amount to something that we really believe in it will boost this on
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Raimondo’s insinuation is that because he met a Third World immigrant for Ron Paul, therefore we ought to welcome the hordes: Never mind those 999 other Third World immigrants who won’t be voting for RP—just highlight the oddity.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Post a Comment
By submitting this form, you give Taki's Magazine permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. Personal attacks, ethnic slurs, the riding of hobby horses and the beating of dead ones will be deleted as soon as they are detected by our small but alert staff. Repeat abusers of this policy will be barred from leaving comments. All comments reflect only the views of those posting them and not necessarily those of this website, its editors, or authors. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.