Austin Bramwell

This Old Status Symbol

Posted by Austin Bramwell on June 15, 2008

Hamptons House

Summer is here! Therefore, rich New Yorkers are going out to the Hamptons to compete for status. One of the many ways they do so is of course to build big and expensive houses. In the past, competition among the super-rich has inspired America’s most distinctive architectural styles--for example, the famous ”Shingle Style” that became popular in the late 19th century. Today, no less than in the past, the super-rich have embraced a distinctive architectural style. So far it lacks a name. I call it the ”Doodad Style.”

Here is a classic example, located in Southampton:

This house has all the elements of the Doodad Style:

1.  First, it combines a plethora of familiar-seeming forms. I count, inter alia, four front-facing gables, a clerestory window, a dormer window, a sort of Queen Anne-style hexagonal tower, and a portico with four columns.

2.  The forms are arranged along a flat plane with little three-dimensional depth. The front porch, for example, looks barely wide enough to accommodate a rocking chair. The tower and the middle gable, grafted together at the base, struggle to obscure each other at the top. Altogether, the structure is not just one house but six: the gabled house on the left, the big two-story box adjoining it, the tower and the middle gable pasted in front of the box, and the two gabled houses on the right. The architect seems to have taken these six houses, lined them up like blocks and pressed them together so that they would all fit into the same lot.

3. Third, the familiar-seeming forms are less traditional than traditionalistic. They are schematics of traditional forms, or degenerate copies of the originals. Take the leftmost first floor window. Its tumid tin-can shape seems to evoke… something. A Palladian window perhaps?  The design is neither interesting nor intelligible, yet recurs six or seven times throughout the structure. It even appears in the porch, perhaps to give the owner a simulacrum of an arched entranceway. (Not that anyone will actually walk through the entrance--it looks instead as if they’ll drive straight into the garage.)

4.  Fourth, for all its many doodads, the shape of the house is quite boring. In essence, it is a long rectangle capped by a squat isosceles triangle--not unlike a large warehouse. If the architect has any imagination or whimsy, he chose not to exercise it here.

5.  Finally, the house has a middle and a top but not a bottom.  Often a vacation home will perch on a large wraparound porch, as do many of these classic Queen Anne Style houses. Here, the porch is tiny and scrunched behind a tower. Meanwhile, the second story looms taller than the first. The bottom of this house seems to have simply sunken underground. Instead of sipping daiquiris on the porch, the inhabitants must be lying around in the basement playing Nintendo.

In sum, the “Doodad Style” takes a big rectangle and tacks on a bunch of “doodads” to make it look “traditional.”

Here are some more examples:

You can buy this house in Sag Harbor for $2.2 million. I especially like that funny white doodad in the middle of the left gable. What is that thing anyway? Note also that the tower on the right doesn’t protrude any higher than the roof, as if afraid to break the four corners of the box.

This house in Bridgehampton costs over $9 million, a sum that will apparently buy you some pretty big doodads, including that watchtower thing that landed on the left side of the house. By an astonishing coincidence, the watchtower still doesn’t upset the shape of the rectangle.

This Doodad Style house in Amagansett is on sale for $4.3 million--still not enough to buy a porch wide enough for you to stand on. Turn this picture upside down--the clerestory window looks like a smiley face with two dimples. The oculus windows on the first floor are the eyes! 

This “luxury home” in East Hampton is going on sale for $10.5 million, which evidently is still not enough money to buy a usable porch. The nearest gable as you drive in looks like a mushroom from Super Mario Brothers. The mushroom on the far corner has one good leg and a peg leg to hold up the other side. The ground floor corner where the chimney rises is a tiny shaded enclave with nothing but four blank walls and a post. How delightful! 

I do not know what the Doodad Style says about the richest Americans today. You could see them as victims of architects who have lost the kind of design knowledge that one was commonplace. No Doodad Style home includes a raised front porch, for example, despite that the raised front porch may be the most beloved and successful element of the typical vacation home. (Do building codes now prohibit porches for some reason?) The owners of a Doodad Style do not know whether to be pretentious or refined, to flaunt their money or to hide it. The style that they have embraced is simply pointless.


Comments

The “Doodad Style” doesn’t have anything on the architectural exuberance on display in Dallas, TX, especially Highland Park (a territory also known as where Richard grew up.) There’s one famous exemplar on Preston-Oak Lawn Ave. which, I suspect, was used as a set during the filming of the latest Lord of the Rings trilogy.

Pity the fools that not only have to look at/visit the buildings, but must also ooh and ahh approvingly at one another’s expensive grotesques.

Looks to me like the work of illegal immigrant workers - and the builder/developer/cost-transfer artists who exploit them - transported from the suburban tract-home development scene and and tasked with the job of doing it larger than before.

What do you expect?  It’s New York, where money and taste tend to appear in inverse proportion.

Even the north shore (w-a-y east). The locals are being driven out by rocketing prices.

The commerical fishing industry was ruined years ago. Most of the farmers have sub-divided their farms into housing developments.

Times change.

CORRECTION:..

Even on the North Shore (w-a-y east)the locals have been driven out by rocketing real estate prices.

Mr Spencer.......a preview button please :o)

Bramwell’s indictment of post Stanford White summer place architecture:

“the familiar-seeming forms are less traditional than traditionalistic. They are schematics of traditional forms, or degenerate copies of the originals...The design is neither interesting nor intelligible”
is doubly cautionary-- it describes the cycle of fashion and decay of small magazines as well.

Hilarious expose’ of the “Doodad” architectural trends. Back when I lived in California, we called them “strip mansions”, because they were made of ticky-tacky, were 5000 square feet, and cost more then the life-time earnings of the average American.

“Doodad” architectural is part of the general decline of standards and quality in the American culture, as much a trend of how decadent we are, as the junk that Hollywood turns out, and crazy stuff like “gay marriage”...not to mention the nonsense we call a “choice” in our political process.

Let’s have a drinking game where we take a sip every time Jupiter spits on Asian people.  Of course, at this point I would have probably died 15 times over from Alcohol poisoning.

Posted by jerry on Jun 17, 2008.

Click to flag this comment as abusive

The NuHammptons has nothing on rural Ohio where dumbed-down versions (if you don’t think the Hamptons are already dumb) sprinkle the backroads for a mere $65,000. Ugly red brick rectangles with pillars and porch attached. Gravel driveway optional.  The Amagansett has more doodads than the Ohio model but it would fit in nicely.  And let’s not even discuss the exburbs.

Post a Comment

By submitting this form, you give Taki's Magazine permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. Personal attacks, ethnic slurs, the riding of hobby horses and the beating of dead ones will be deleted as soon as they are detected by our small but alert staff. Repeat abusers of this policy will be barred from leaving comments. All comments reflect only the views of those posting them and not necessarily those of this website, its editors, or authors. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.

Commenting is not available in this section entry.