Bungle in the Jungle
The government’s assaults on our common sense, our wallets, and our dignity are becoming so numerous that one is hard pressed to keep up. The media pivot like a herd of wildebeests from one scandal to the other—from illegal wiretapping, to torture, to mercenaries, to saber rattling in the Persian Gulf, to $4 billion lost at Homeland Security, to $9 billion stolen in Iraq.
Amid such a blur of perfidy, major events that portend disaster in the future can slip by with barely a notice by the media, by Congress, or by the public at large. For example, does one voter in a hundred know that the Department of Defense has quietly activated a new regional military command? Just type in the acronym "AFRICOM" into a search box, and the reader will find a DOD website that presents the new United States Africa Command, in the same boosterish manner thatMicrosoft rolls out a new operating platform.
According to the site, "U.S. Africa Command will better enable the Department of Defense and other elements of the U.S. government to work in concert and with partners to achieve a more stable environment in which political and economic growth can take place. U.S. Africa Command is consolidating the efforts of three existing headquarters commands into one that is focused solely on Africa and helping to coordinate US government contributions on the continent."
In other words, more meddling, more fishing in troubled waters, more displacement of traditional diplomacy with militarized "shaping of the environment," more armed, buzz-cut boy scouts playing roughly the same role Graham Greene’s "Quiet American" played in South East Asia. Oh, yes, and oil in the Gulf of Guinea.
The Center for Defense Information has posted a useful primer on AFRICOM, which discusses some of the misgivings that the intended host countries have about Uncle Sam’s gun-toting social work on the Dark Continent. There is no need to recapitulate its information and arguments; the reader should consult it for further enlightenment.
There remain only two issues to mention that the CDI piece does not cover: the domestic institutional angle and the domestic political angle.
All government bureaucracies, if allowed to fester, metastasize like a malignant cancer cell. DOD, having been given extraordinarily indulgent latitude by a somnolent Congress, has metastasized more than the norm. AFRICOM is yet another venue for general officer billets, staff jobs, and proconsular pretensions. Once created, the bureaucratic imperative becomes paramount. The collapse of the Warsaw Pact nearly two decades ago did not lead to the dissolution of NATO. AFRICOM, once created, will be immortal.
AFRICOM also represents a God-sent opportunity for both our major political parties to find new worlds to conquer. The GOP, being a subsidiary of Big Oil, is fairly licking its chops at West African oil, although how a bunch of armed social workers would "stabilize" a basket case like Nigeria is not clear, given the unfortunate precedent of Somalia.
As for the Democrats, this could be their big moment once again to preen as Wilsonian internationalists and hairy-chested liberals. Throughout the 1990s, any discussion about the Balkans was sure to include some cavil from advanced thinkers that we intervene only in white countries because we value their lives more—what about Rwanda?
Should the first Wednesday after the first Monday of November 2008 dawn with a Democratic President-elect, AFRICOM will be a ready-made vehicle for proving he or she is no wimp, and for mollifying important Democratic voting blocs as well. Should the President-elect be a Republican, there is always the oil.
Werther is the pen name of a Northern Virginia-based defense analyst.

Comments
Hairy Chested Liberals of War or Crude Oil Soaked Fake Christians of War.
God help us all.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
If Barack Hussein Obama is president, war in Africa will be inevitable. As the neocons brought the “gift” of democracy to the Middle East, so Obama will bring it to Africa. He has repeatedly stated that, if elected, he will invade Darfur.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Let’s bomb ‘em back to the stone age!!!
er, nevermind…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Darfur_refugee_camp_in_Chad.jpg
Click to flag this comment as abusive
I’ve warned about this one is another forum and Bede is absolutely right about Obama providing us a war in Africa. And he may not be the only candidate with this in mind.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
I do hope the Royal Headquarters of AFRICOM will be suitably adorned with a giant Gold Statue of General Gordon missing....what was it, oh yes,.... his head, on a pike on the ramparts of Khartoum.
Is there a manual hidden in the Pentagon entitled
“Silly Adventures of the Waning British Empire We want to top”?
Ahh the stirring chants and Souza Marches of the Military-Industrial-Entertainment-Self Immolation Complex.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
You worry too much. These overseas adventures are driven by domestic politics (not oil or the like),
specifically they are driven by the Republican’s growing inability to compete in domestic politics in the
face of the overwhelming cultural power of their supposed opponents. It is an expensive and desperate campaign con game that can’t go on forever, at least without a rest. What’s more, the vast majority of the American people realize what a savage, irredeemable hell hole most of Africa is, and even the
Republicans understand there is no domestic political reward for getting physically tangled there. (We signed
a treaty that obliges us to intervene militarily in cases of “genocide” but you don’t see anyone rushing to honor that treaty in Darfur, do you?) Besides, the chief way that the Republicans have sold out their nation and constituents in order to placate the media dictatorship (while servicing big business) is with open borders. We already have virtually no national interests because we are no longer really a nation, which is why almost all our recent wars have been in the name of what some call “liberal imperialism”, wars to impose the principles of multiculturalism that don’t work at home on basket cases abroad, aimed more at supporting the policies back home than helping others. It is hard to imagine the coming third-world/leftist ruling coalition spending money overseas that could be divvied up between the tribal groups making up the empire back home. It is also hard to imagine that even the Mid-Western and Southern white military adventurers who now make up the majority of combat troops will continue to volunteer to die for this new political reality. Even they are bound to tumble sometime to the suckerhood of dying overseas for a system that has as its chief moral principle their dispossession and elimination.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Soon to be out on video game Africom!!! Video games that glorify war are making sure there is an unending supply of mindless morons willing to sign on for mayhem. As if the public school system wasn’t enough.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
well it always was odd that 90% of the continent of Africa was part of “EUCOM” (the European command), so in a geographically purist perspective this kind of makes sense, but I wouldn’t get all wrapped around the axle about this meaning we are going to find ourselves mired in the depths of the Congo—most of “Africom” will be administered right out of good old Stuttgart and all that will REALLY change is that you’ll have a lot more “brass hat” jobs to divvy up.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Speaking of Imperialist adventuring, George MacDonald, the creator of the Flashman series, died today. I suggest making his stories required reading in the Imperial Corps campsites. His stories will introduce them to what is coming.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
@Dorde,
I came into possession of Flashman a number of years ago. Do you recommend it or should I toss it?
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Now what?
Every time one of these bureaucratic contortions churns its way through the Pentagon, we slam headfirst into another unmitigated disaster. Almost five years downwind from the start of the Iraq War, we know the Office of Special Plans was an OSP at our breast.
And now… this crap. What are they planning for the Dark Continent?
We can pretty much be sure the neocons are still in the drivers’ seats – at both Democratic and Republican headquarters. Gone are the days of the gasbag, self-aggrandizing drivel, or the David-Frum-style excommunications from all elements “conservative.” But they still hold the trump cards, they still have their ingrown, nepotistic media lap-doggies and they still control the top lobbies.
But why Africa? Why now? Africa is a chronic – if resource-rich – basket case. Perennially, it is a continent of nations collectively unable to rise above subsistence-level social provision. It’s all the fault of… colonialism, post-colonialism. Economic… colonialism. Racism. Dammit – honkies. We’re to blame. The disastrous reality of Africa is always the fault of outsiders. At least… that’s what we’re told, and told, and told.
Many is the time I’ve thought: Shoot, we’re getting blamed for the sorry state of affairs, anyway - why not at least benefit from the situation. There are the Africans, trapped in a state of eternal Neolithic backwardness. Why not bump them off? Take their countries? There’s oil. There’s gold. There is a virtual treasure trove of non-ferrous metal and mineral wealth.
Dammit – there’re DIAMONDS!
Is that it? Is that what they’re thinking inside the Beltway? Will we pay for our Mideastern adventures by looting other parts of the world as kind of an American Raj?
If that’s the plan - and, admittedly, this is the worst of worse-case scenearios – is there anything that will turn us from this grand-scale geographic piracy? We know we can’t rely on our consciences. We’ve already rolled on waterboarding and shredding the Constitution. What’s left? Our best intentions?
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Colonial exploits only lead to dependency… white man in heap big trouble living off the labor of others… no such thing as a free lunch even if you steal it
Click to flag this comment as abusive
<<Will we pay for our Mideastern adventures by looting other parts of the world as kind of an American Raj?>>
I’m sure the planners haven’t thought this far ahead, but where’s the next place to invade to pay for the African adventures? South America? Then what? Asia? Eventually, it comes down to America invading itself to pay for these adventures.
The problem: 90% of Americans are too concerned with American Idol (aka the “Presidential primaries") to think about this stuff.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
These overseas adventures are driven by domestic politics (not oil or the like)
I have to respectfully disagree. The OILgarchy folks see our military more and more as oils security force. This video is about Africa: Americas new oil target.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aUzJdtuNa_Y
Click to flag this comment as abusive
America already has looted itself to a fair-thee-well. The Corporate Bolsheviks and Bunko Government might not have turned guns on the populace but they have conscripted them in a defacto auto-plundering and debt sell-off of magnificent proportions. Guns are not required in this instance, the sheep are shorn cooperatively.
Evangelism will finish the work begun by the government-corporate comintern.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
@M.Nucci
Yes, by all means read the stories. The are historically accurate tongue-in-cheek “adventures” starring that rogue of rogues Harry Flashman. They are well written (although a level below the historical novels of Patrick O’Brian)fun with lots of “footnotes”. And , of course, the author was George MacDonald Fraser.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
I second the recommendation of George MacDonald Fraser and the swashbuckling Flashman. There was a nice endnote (obituary) on GMF by the foxy Margalit in the 3 Jan 08 edition of the New York Times. I scavenged the paper at the local café. I wouldn’t lay out a nickel for the rag, although I confess to sometimes reading foxy Tom Friedman in lieu of the comic strips.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Post a Comment
By submitting this form, you give Taki's Magazine permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. Personal attacks, ethnic slurs, the riding of hobby horses and the beating of dead ones will be deleted as soon as they are detected by our small but alert staff. Repeat abusers of this policy will be barred from leaving comments. All comments reflect only the views of those posting them and not necessarily those of this website, its editors, or authors. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.
Commenting is not available in this section entry.