Chain of Fools: Nepotism as Immigration Policy
It is axiomatic that an uncontrolled influx of immigrants, as now exists at the Mexican Border, and legal immigration through presently accepted chain-immigration policies, with no language requirements or assimilation into the culture, will change the status of the host nation to that of the immigrants. In other words, if America kept its doors open, as at present, the Third World would continue to send its millions to the United States until a balance were reached when America would join the Third World itself.
Family reunification permits a newly naturalized citizen to bring members of his extended family to the host country. For each naturalization chain immigration gives us a bonus of three. It’s the gift that keeps on giving.
This policy was brought to the United States through the Immigration Act of 1965, authored by Senator Edward M.(Ted) Kennedy (D-MA) and his late brother, Senator Robert F. Kennedy (D-NY). Senator Ted Kennedy floor- managed the bill through the United States Senate.
Coincidentally, Senator Kennedy is co-author of the present “comprehensive” immigration bill now before the > Senate. He is floor-managing the present bill as well.
Family reunification was the Pandora’s Box of the Immigration Act of 1965. Once opened, it permitted immediate relatives (that is, spouses, minor children and parents) of a newly naturalized citizen to enter the United States and qualify as Legal Permanent Residents permitted to live out their lives in America and receive its bounty of benefits. Bona fide Legal Permanent Residents after four years are permitted to bring their relatives in, thus creating an endless chain.
Both Senators Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) and Barack Obama (D-IL) reportedly are moving to broaden the present family-reunification provisions of the newly introduced “Secure Borders, Economic Opportunity and Immigration Reform Act of 2007.” Family reunification provisions in immigration laws of many other nations have led to chain immigration, the present nemesis of the Western World.
We have only to look to Europe, now openly referred to as Eurabia. Reports out of socially liberal Norway identify immigrant family reunification as “out of control” with its lack of assimilation into the Scandinavian nation’s population. A moratorium on immigrant family reunification policies is being called for.
In England both the Liberal and Conservative Parties are calling for reform of the policy of family reunification. The key non-Western immigrant populations in both Norway and England are Pakistani Muslims. Ethnic and religious customs of arranged cousin-marriages are inhibiting assimilation into local societies. As cousins marry cousins, there is an endless family relationship throughout the entire Muslim society.
It is reported that Muslim cousin-marriage also has facilitated a process of “reverse colonization,” in which large, culturally intact sections of Pakistani Muslim society have been effectively transferred to British soil.
Holland has been particularly hard hit. A New York Times report in February 2005 carried the headline, “More Dutch Plan to Emigrate as Muslim Influx Tips Scales.” The report noted that foreign born are 10% of the population of the Netherlands, that immigrant youths make up half the prison population, and that more than 40% of immigrants receive some form of governmental assistance. In addition, the Muslims are threatening and intimidating Dutch citizens who criticize Islam in Holland.
The anti-Dutch attitude of the Muslim community came to the surface with the assassination of Dutch film maker
Theo Van Gogh by a 26-year-old Muslim, Mohammed Bouyeri, on November 2, 2004. Van Gogh had produced a film that exposed “violence against women in Muslim societies.”
Loosely formulated immigration policies that lack adequate enforcement are creating mass confusion in America. Chain migration is making itself ever more obvious in the United States. An article in the Raleigh News & Observer reports the story of one man, Pablo Baltazar, legalized in the 1986 amnesty. Baltazar was able to bring over the entire, extended Baltazar Family by importing all nine of his siblings, followed by their spouses and children. More disturbing—and in a clear echoing of the European pattern—the article notes, “Chain migration has cleared out an entire village in Mexico. And it has turned areas of rural North Carolina into places where Spanish is the dominant language and ‘tiendas’ replace country stores.”
To place new and questionable immigration laws on the books will only complicate the present problems. America needs a breather. Start with a moratorium on all aspects of family reunification; repeal the infamous 1965Immigration Act with its provisions that favor Asian immigrants five to one over Anglo-Europeans; build a fence along the Mexican> Border—and begin constructing viable immigration programs that protect the culture of America.
As painful as it may be, we must begin a deportation of all illegal immigrants, regardless of the country of origin. This will both occupy the liberals, who will do everything possible to prevent deportation, and at the same time energize the conservatives.
There is no simple answer to our massive immigration problems. Any solution will be painful to someone. But what could be more painful than the once most-powerful nation in the world, both militarily and economically, waking up one morning and finding itself in the Third World?
--A Free Congress Foundation Commentary. E. Ralph Hostetter, a prominent businessman and publisher, also is an award-winning columnist and Vice Chairman of the Free Congress Foundation Board of Directors. He welcomes email comments at .
Comments
It is more than just “assimilation,” if such a thing even exists. This is an outright third-world invasion of the West. In an ideal world, fifth columnists like GW and Kenney would be impeached, arrested, and tried for treason.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Oh but don’t worry. A “Libertarian” (pause) “revolution” is on the way, and if we can just rid ourselves - (in a revolutionary way, similar to the Marxist dream of returning to an Eden before property ever began) - if we can just rid ourselves of “The Government” (whatever the hell that puerile, adolescent abstraction signifies), then, “The Market” will inevitably correct this problem of millions of Mexicans - most of whom are ignorant at best or hostile at worst to the national character and heritage of the USA - “The Market” will MAGICALLY solve this problem, if we could just return to the ideal primitive condition of the Garden of Eden! Oh, yes, if only there were no “government” - or if only we could find some MAGICAL way (and we will pretend it’s a “scientific” way) to disentangle the legacy of 5,000 years of “government”, THEN we could find a Utopian solution to the problem of bloody millions of hostile aliens invading the USA in just one-tenth of the time that it took only 100,000 Anglo-Saxons to conquer England in the space of 150 years. Yes, yes, “The Market” (whatever the hell that is, that abstraction which will never exist in any perfect way in history, no more than any perfect “socialist” state could ever exist) - yes, “The Market” will inevitably solve this problem! Just as inevitably as the Marxist Utopia ever solved anything.
(Dripping with sarcasm here, dripping like Niagra Falls...)
By the way - and yes I know this is a bit of a digression from the topic of this post, but I really think it’s important to point this out to our community NOW, before it gets out of hand: On this site, I’ve been writing warnings about the potential for American “Libertarianism” to devolve into a revolutionary movement which will
inevitably transform into tyranny, just like Marxism devolved inevitably into Leninsim. Well, here you go - a recent article on Lew Rockwell’s site, in which a so-called “Libertarian” suggested adopting and adapting the methods of Lenin in the cause of a “Libertarian” revolution. It says, in part:
“Let’s turn back to Lenin. The revolutionary situation is necessary but not sufficient for the success of a revolution. Also needed is a small but dedicated, cohesive, and well-organized cadre of professional revolutionaries...Similarly, a libertarian revolution will require a large nucleus of intellectuals and educators who will show the libertarian way...”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/boukhonine/boukhonine10.html
Taki, Taki, good God, man, WHAT have YOU or any REAL conservatives to do, with THAT? All, ALL traditional conservatives recoil with horror from the notion of any “cadre of professional revolutionaries”.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
It is a common misconception that the 1965 immigration bill is the handiwork of the then very junior senator from the Bay State. While this serves as a partisan bugaboo it hides the real authors and their motives. At the time it was called the Hart-Celler Bill, named after senator from Michigan and a congressman from New York City.
It was actually crafted by lawyers for the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society for the long serving Emanuel Celler who had opposed the quota system in the 1920s. It took him forty years to succeed. At the time of the quota enactment there were charges of anti-Semitism hurled about. Many Jewish leaders publicly vowed to kill it as part of an openly avowed policy of divide and conquer the Christian culture of the United States. The goal of the 1965 Hart-Celler Act was to destroy the Protestant Ascendency by means of genocide. It has worked.
This has been best explained by Bob Whitaker who says,
“Liberals and respectable conservatives say there is this race problem. Everybody says this race problem will be solved when the third world pours into every white country and only into white countries.
The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this race problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.
Everybody says the final solution to this race problem is for every white country and only white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those nonwhites.
What if I said there was this race problem and this race problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into every black country and only into black countries?
How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a race problem. I am talking about the final solution to the black problem?
And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?
But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
They say they are antiracist. What they are is anti-white.
Antiracist is a code word for anti-white.”
The first step to defeating unlimited immigration is to understand what its goals are and whose goals they are. The Hart-Celler Act did not emanate from the Kennedys though they helped it along. The goal was not economic liberalism, its goal was genocide against white America. If anyone wants to better understand the political forces that nurtured this assault on the republic the best source would be articles and books by Dr. Kevin MacDonald of the California university system. The essentials are readily available online.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
There is a fundamental difference between European immigration problems with the American, at least as far as the Mexicans are concerned.
It is forgotten conviniently that the West and the Southwests was snatched by a well known U.S. imperialist enterprise.
Mexicans have never forgotten that, and are still carrying a strong emotional attachment to their “El Norte”, which represents a third of their original country.
Don’t they have some small moral right to share that part of their country conquered by Us? Are they really being unreasonable when they disdain the assimilation? Also, they are not Muslims so hardly jihadists, are they?
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Laying all the blame for American decline at the feet of third world immigration is unfair. The gutting of our domestic industries has done at least, if not more damage to our economic base.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Does violence work? If the product one expects is- more violence, it certainly does work.
What does work is the high birthrate.
The group that doesn’t want to multiply, won’t be able to hold on to its empty Lebensraum. As simple as that.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
The depressed white birthrate, of course, is a direct function of
massive non-white immigration. Young White people simply
cannot afford to have families, due to out-of-control taxes and the price
inflation that are a result of the third world colonisation of the US.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Mr. Ball;
Sam Francis suggested we study the tactics of one Antonio Gramsci, so I think most folks on the Right can handle the concept, ‘revolutionary conservatism.’
Paying people to leave (repatriate) seems like a humane and sensible means to tackle not only illegal immigration, but legal refugee communities who don’t quite fit either.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
The popularity of birth control and the trend of women delaying family and marriage until after establishing a career is much more responsible for declinging birthrates among whites.
Supporting the war and interventionist foreign policy through deficit spending and low interest rates are also more responsible for price inflation. Cheap immigrant labor on its own tends to lower prices.
You can’t blame the Mexicans since sex is now a meaningless sport and GWB is throwing billions of dollars (in declining value) into the sand.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
The West is committing suicide on so many levels,
but above all spiritual, why pick immigration
as the target of venom? Immigration is a symptom,
not a cause.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
People forget history quickly.
Western Europeans and Americaans let Latin Americans,
Asians and Africans into their countries because Russia
and the West were in a struggle for world domination and
sought the backing of the non-white countries.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Yes, of course, feminism and interventionist foreign
policies are partly to blame for low white birthrates.
But importing third world colonists puts enormous pressure
on indigenous white populations.
When immigrants colonise neighborhoods, it causes
an exodus of whites to more desirable neighborhoods,
leading in turn to real estate price inflation in those neighborhoods.
Young white couples with large mortgages delay having families until they
can afford to have children, while Juan, Muhammed, and
Chang fresh off the boat have large families.
Supplies of land and good housing are finite, while demand
(due to immigration-driven population growth) is rising.
Click to flag this comment as abusive