Don’t Look Left

Posted by F.J. Sarto on March 22, 2007

There is ample reason to be disgusted and depressed by the state of the American conservative movement. Its leading journals are run either by ideologues or arrested adolescents, and the president it has backed to the bitter end has betrayed, successively each of its governing principles:

Fiscal responsibility. Spending like a compulsive geriatric gambler wearing Depends so he needn’t get up from his slot machine stool in Atlantic City, a Republican president has transformed a modest surplus into an unthinkable, unpayable deficit that has our country in hock to China. (Let’s not forget that before what they viewed as the “divine surprise” of 9/11, the neocons were goading us into confrontation with China—even as they’re now picking fights with Russia.)

Limited government and individual rights. The same pundits who screamed that fascism was coming to America when the Clinton administration took Elian Gonzalez back to his father, who howled about the “persecution” of the militia movement, now favor the unrestricted arrest without charge, trial, or appeal, of American citizens—on the word of the President. Complain all you like about how the neocons are fundamentally Trotskyites—their president claims the powers of Josef Stalin. (The Black Maria rattles up in the middle of the night, and you disappear into the Lubyanka….)

Prudence in Foreign Policy. In a direct betrayal of his campaign promises (remember the words “modest foreign policy”?), that same combat-shy president has muffed the chance to capture our real enemies (Al Qaeda, remember them?), and instead launched two separate campaigns to transform Islamic backwaters into Western European democracies—squandering American lives and treasure, and costing the lives of hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians. He also helped destroy one of the last refuges for Christians in the Middle East (Israel has wrecked Lebanon, and Bush may well hand Syria over to the Islamists.) He now contemplates a direct, aggressive war against Iran that would be no more just than Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbor (another “preemptive war”).

But why go on? Readers of this site know all about how the conservative movement has dropped its pro-life litmus test, and is now rallying behind a serial adulterer who supports gun control, partial-birth abortion, gay marriage, open borders, and aggressive wars. 

Just now I’d like to depress the reader even further, by pointing out that the Left offers no alternative. Sure, they favor a more reasonable policy in the Middle East (at least, the far Left does), one which would encourage a just Israeli settlement with the Palestinians that might defuse the possibility of war—and get the Israelis off land they can’t populate, and won’t ever have the gall to ethnically cleanse, and which if they don’t abandon will soon put them in the minority, just like the South African whites.

And the Left opposes the all-encompassing police powers demanded by the Bush administration—mostly because they’re aimed at Moslems rather than at home-schoolers, prolifers, or middle-class folks who’d like to carry guns in self-defense.

That’s about it, folks. On every other issue—and I know this may be hard to swallow—the Left is even worse than the neocon right. As crackpot as the Christian Right has become—John Hagee’s translation of Mein Kampf into pidgin King James English, Jerusalem Countdown, is already a best-seller, being pimped by the likes of Human Events—it is the only force holding back the kind of outrages which the Left gets up to when there’s no force to oppose it.

What am I talking about? Let’s take a look at a few sites around the world where the cultural Left has taken undisputed power, and see what these fine folks get up to once they’ve chewed through the straps and taken over the asylum:

In Quebec, a proposed government policy would forbid private Christian schools from teaching Biblical sexual ethics. 

A law with similar intent is pending in Brazil, which according to Zenit News “seeks to criminalize anything considered a condemnation of homosexuality, including priests who speak against the practice in homilies. Priests could face two to five years imprisonment for preaching against homosexuality. And a rector of a seminary who refuses admission to a homosexual student could face three to five years.”

In Britain, the “anti-discrimination” regulation which will prevent Catholic and other serious Christian adoption agencies from placing children only with married, heterosexual couples will also restrict the teaching of Christian sexual ethics in schools, according to the non-partisan, secular news site MarriageDebate.com.

In Germany, where home-schooling was outlawed by Hitler and the law left on the books, the parents of 15-year-old Melissa Busekros lost custody of the girl for teaching her at home. She is now being held at a psychiatric institution—diagnosed with “school-phobia” at an undisclosed location, with no access to her parents. In the German state of Baden-Wuerttemberg, laws restricting religious garb—which were aimed at the Moslems that country unaccountably allowed to settle there—are now being used to strip teaching nuns of their habits.

In Poland and Ireland, the democratically-passed laws restricting abortion on demand may well be stricken from the books by the diktat of unelected judicial bureaucrats of the European Court of Human Rights—who by the way, ruled against the parents of the abducted German teenager.

Meanwhile, in France, children are still forbidden to wear visible crucifixes or yarmulkes, since this is the only way that anti-clerical country can justify to itself stripping Islamic girls of the Hijab they are religiously moved to wear.

Across the Rhine in Deutschland, a judge recently ruled in favor of an abusive Islamic husband who beat his wife—basing his decision on the Koran

To what does this all add up? The fact that the secular Left, around the world, is engaged in a systematic persecution of Christianity, per se—even as it bends itself into knots to accommodate other religions, and every conceivable lifestyle perversion. The only reason that the secularist elites in this country haven’t tried harder to crack down in the U.S. is the presence of a large, Evangelical Christian movement—and a few Catholic intellectual cheerleaders. The presence of that movement serves as a bulwark against these forms of repression—for the moment.

But with every occasion on which the Christian Right squanders its moral capital, every unjust war it supports, every foolish statement designed to provoke a war between Israel and her neighbors, every ham-handed attempt to keep Christians from taking the environment (and the survival of God’s Creation) seriously, that bulwark erodes just a little. Intelligent young people look at the movement which can sanction such irresponsibility, which touts the likes of Sean Hannity, Ann Coulter, Newt Gingrich, and George W. Bush, and turn away in disgust. Like the Catholics of Spain who associate the Church with Franco’s secret police, they shudder and look for something else—a worldview which is not so manifestly juvenile and irrational.

They may very well turn to the secular Left. The Christian Right could vanish like the “massive” Southern resistance to desegregation, like the Temperance movement which once outlawed alcohol in 50 states, like the Black Power movement… like every other half-baked ideological crusade which faded away with the irrational emotions that had driven it, in the absence of serious thought.

And then we will be in the same boat as our cousins in Brazil, Quebec, and England. We’ll be facing real persecution by a “soft” totalitarian system that holds the family in contempt, regards Christianity as its enemy, and covets cradle-to-grave control over the thoughts, feelings and actions of its subjects. 

The only hope of resisting the partisans of secular intolerance is to clean up the Christian Right (Catholic and Protestant), to purge it of jingoism, anti-intellectualism, and end-of-the world nihilism, then to break up its shotgun wedding to the hacks who run the conservative movement. The Christian Right must become less “Right” and much more Christian, reassert its intellectual and moral independence of partisan politics, and insist on applying its principles consistently. Pastors must stop endorsing torture, public Catholics must choose their pope above their president, and all of us must remember that the real war is not between the Democratic and Republican parties, but between the Church and the World. And the battlefield lies within our hearts. 

Comments

Chapeau!

Posted by RCG on Mar 23, 2007.
Click to flag this comment as abusive

Franz,

You say:

“But with every occasion on which the Christian Right squanders its moral capital, every unjust war it supports, every foolish statement designed to provoke a war between Israel and her neighbors, every ham-handed attempt to keep Christians from taking the environment (and the survival of God’s Creation) seriously, that bulwark erodes just a little. Intelligent young people look at the movement which can sanction such irresponsibility, which touts the likes of Sean Hannity, Ann Coulter, Newt Gingrich, and George W. Bush, and turn away in disgust. Like the Catholics of Spain who associate the Church with Franco’s secret police, they shudder and look for something else—a worldview which is not so manifestly juvenile and irrational”

Just an outstanding analysis, Franz. But I’m afraid that the bulwark erodes not just a little with these events but rather critically. We’re now past the point that any reform will have much meaning in my view. The whole effort need to be shown the door and reinterpreted. The extant emphasis on pragmatism has proven itself utterly bancrupt. Better out of power altogether than conjoined to the kind of leadership that these folks represent. Just yesterday Cardinal Bertone offered Benedict XVI’s criticism of an erroneous “political Christianity” which goes to a view of the role of faith that is at once more activist than simply critical. Once requires little imagination to see who’s being identified here.

John Lowell

Frantz,

For what it’s worth, here is Cardinal Bertone to the effect that Benedict XVI “does not want to fall into the error of constructing a political Catholicism” because “the faith does not provide political recipes but rather simply seeks to contribute to the purification of reason.”. I was somewhat more clumsy in paraphrasing his statement. 

John Lowell

Bravo!!!  Outstanding analysis, Mr. Sarto.  Thank you very much.

FJ shows integrity when he admits that as reprehensible as the
the Christian Right’s neocon masters may be, the official Left
is even more ghastly--and certainly more degenerate. The triumph
of this Left in Europe indicates where we too may be headed.

Slow down, young man!  This isn’t the first time the Repuglicans have sold the Conservatives down the river.  Remember Reagan?  Hell, I remember Nixon!  Remember how bad we all thought Carter would be?  Clinton?  And now we look back to them with nostalgia.  Sure they had bad ideas, but they knew their limits.  So would Obama.  I’m less sure about that woman from New York.

Bra!  Vo!  Amen and Amen!

FJ, You call for the Christian Right to become less “Right” and more
Christian. But which Christians should we be? The doctrinal differences
between Christians are very real and thus make Christianity a poor unifying principle for a society
as heterogenous as ours. Shopping is,unfortunately, far better.

Spot on, Mr. Sarto!

Posted by Paul on Mar 23, 2007.
Click to flag this comment as abusive

Excellent analysis F.J. Sarto. Us christians ought to stop advocating for a crusade in the middle east against muslims. The message of the Christian Way is one of inclusion and tolerance and of sharing the invitation made by God to us through his Son to be at peace with Him and become His sons and daughters. Our message ought not be one of conversion at the point of the sword or via an inquistion but ought to be one of reaching out and showing ourselves to be loving, as His nature is to love. Events in the world do appear to be polarizing us all even more than i initially thought they would.

Posted by john on Mar 23, 2007.
Click to flag this comment as abusive

Mr Van Wortendyke:  1.  I disagree that Republicans have ever “sold conservatives down the river”, because the truth is that the Republican party has seldom if ever been authentically “conservative” in any real sense of that word, ever since its birth in the 1850s.  Even the superficially “conservative” Republicans of, say, the 1920s, tended to believe in the American superstition of progress.  2.  As I recall, America generally had high hopes for Carter until he proved himself to be an incompetent tergiversator.  And do we need to be reminded that the Taliban and Al Qaeda are blowback from the Carter administration’s STUPID interventions in the Soviet war in Afghanistan, inspired by the most myopic kind of Cold War hostility to Russia?
The Russians were actually doing the West a favour by trying to bring Afghanistan to heel in the 1980s, and if
America had any sense at the time it would have lent at least moral support to Russia’s efforts, especially since by the 1980s the Russians no longer gave a damn about “Communism” anymore.  Now look at the mess we, and Russia, and Europe are in.  There is no reason for anyone to be “nostalgic” about the Carter administration.  4.  As for Carter or Clinton “knowing their limits”, this means nothing unless you say what those “limits” are.  Both Presidencies were disasters and the latter one was a disgrace.  5.  Obama’s character, as evidenced so far, shows him to be far more of a vain fantasist than one who regards “limits” with humility.

J. Ball,

Tergiversator? Now there’s a word too long kept in obscurity. And with so much writing out there on politics and politicians. One would think you’d be seeing it twice a day.

Marvelous.

John Lowell

Amen.  Thank you for so clearly summing up my generation’s quandary: as a twenty-something Catholic, I don’t know where to turn.  I will be forced, as you say, to put aside blind partisan loyalty and frankly ANY political ideologies or affiliations for the higher (but much more difficult) task of sorting out the good and the true wherever they may be.

There were only 48 states at the time Prohibition was adopted and repealed.  Alaska and Hawaii were not states.

Quite right, the Repugs were baddies from the gitgo to Gitmo, but the Conservatives, so called, certainly sucked up to them.  As for Carter and Clinton, I must admit I never voted for either, and I don’t imagine I will for Obama either.

Posted by Worty on Mar 25, 2007.
Click to flag this comment as abusive

I hate to be the splasher of cold water, Mr. Sarto, but what would you have us actually *do*? It’s all fine to say “renew your faith,” but that’s no substitute for real policy proposals. Sure, you tell us what *not* to do, but after we have divested ourselves of all the vices you cite, where do we go then? How do we obtain for ourselves “limited government,” for example, and what do you even mean by it?

While yours is a fine article, it’s not unlike a thousand others we’ve read over the last thirty years. Yet, where are we now? Deeper in the pigsh*t than ever. The simple fact is that, no matter how pure of heart we may become, our system is corrupted so fundamentally and to such a degree that reform from within is impossible. That is to say, in addition to whatever problems we may have that arise from a lack of faith, we have a massive *structural* problem that prevents the kind of reform necessary to bring about the vision of government conservatives generally hold. One of these days, I hope conservatives will finally wake up and realize how wasted their current efforts are, and how worthless their strategy.

James Newland,

While I’m certainly not F.J. Sarto - he can answer for himself - and hope you’ll forgive my barging in, I’d have to say that there are, indeed, positive steps we can take although I’d agree enthusiastically with your analysis. Instead of looking to the left - or to the right for that matter - look all around you, particularly upward if you’ll excuse my pointing you in a most innacurate theological direction. The solution here is rather not to be dealing in policies or programs at all but in engaging the form of Christ in the world. I’d suggest your considering the writing of David Schindler, an interpreter of Hans Urs von Balthasar, so as to flesh out some of the detail. He makes for a good beginning.

To have expected much - even anything at all - of the current approach has been the error made by so many. It never really had a chance of offereing what it seemed to. But hope springs eternal. Focus your hope on Someone that can fulfil it.

John Lowell

Get a clue: just as the Christian Right supports Israel first so they can get “raptured” and then 2/3 of the Jews fry, the same Christian Right does and says the idiotic things they do and say--totally disregarding the Bible--PRECISELY to bring about the power of radical secularist leftism here in this country...aka “the antiChrist”! Hagee and company know EXACTLY what they are doing!

Great article except the notion that
the Christian Right can or should be
“cleaned up.”

It should be burned at the stake…

Post a Comment

By submitting this form, you give Taki's Magazine permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. Personal attacks, ethnic slurs, the riding of hobby horses and the beating of dead ones will be deleted as soon as they are detected by our small but alert staff. Repeat abusers of this policy will be barred from leaving comments. All comments reflect only the views of those posting them and not necessarily those of this website, its editors, or authors. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.

Commenting is not available in this section entry.