It’s the Democrats’ Race to Lose
I watched what was advertised as the first Democratic debate of the political season. MSNBC carried a 90-minute question and answer session wherein all eight announced Democratic candidates for President answered questions from NBC anchor Brian Williams. Williams was fair but he did not lob tough questions at the candidates. For example, Williams might have asked why each of the candidates flew in to Columbia, South Carolina by private jet instead of by commercial airlines – global warming and all that, you know.
For what it is worth, here is my evaluation of how each candidate performed: First, New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson (D-NM) would have had to come out swinging in order to distinguish himself from the rest of the group. He did not do so. Instead, he was not decisive. I don’t believe he stood out from the group. Thus, I don’t think he accomplished what he needed to become a cinch for the Vice Presidency.
Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) was her usual self. She was tough and clear but certainly did not soften her image. I thought Senator Barack Obama (D-IL) helped himself because he appeared to be prepared for the tougher questions. He has been charged by critics as not having any beef. This time he appeared to have some.
I was about to give former Senator John Edwards (D-NC) high marks when Williams asked him who was his moral leader. At first he couldn’t answer the question. Finally he ended up saying his wife and his father. That looked bad and otherwise spoiled what was a good showing.
Among the also-rans, my view is that Senator Christopher J. Dodd (D-CT) did himself the most good. He actually looked Presidential. There was one moment of levity. Senator Joseph R. Biden, Jr. (D-DE) was asked if he would assure the nation that he would control his tendency to be verbose. His one word answer, which drew great laughter from the audience, was “Yes.” Other than the final question, Biden did not have a chance to demonstrate his foreign policy expertise.
Third-string candidates also were in attendance. This may be their last time to appear on the national stage. In 2004 Democrats had many national panels. In addition to the major candidates such as Senator John F. Kerry (D-MA) and Vermont Governor Howard P. Dean, III, Democrats permitted defeated Senator Carol Moseley Braun (D-IL) and Reverend Al Sharpton to remain during the string of debates and joint appearances, which continued for months. To have elevated Sharpton and Braun as on par with major candidates raised questions inside Democratic circles. They have done it again. Representative Dennis Kucinich (D-IL) said he was against the Iraqi War before any other candidate had said so. Former Alaska Senator Mike Gravel (D-AK), among the also-rans, embarrassed the other candidates by accusing them of refusing to do what is necessary to end the war. Gravel has not been heard of for many years. When his hair was black and he was a Senator in 1972 he ran for Vice President when his colleague Senator George S. McGovern (D-SD) won the Democratic nomination. He did not win. In fact, he ran third on the ballot. He was defeated by Frank Murkowski (R-AK) in 1980 and has been hiding since.
Newsweek stated there was no clear winner in the debate and NBC’s Tim Russert agreed. He said Senators Clinton, Obama and former Senator Edwards are still the front-runners. In Russert’s opinion none of the other five candidates broke out of the pack. The establishment has spoken.
With so many candidates, it would be impossible to have a real debate. If the primaries narrow the group to one or two candidates a back-and-forth exchange might be possible. This upcoming Republican debate will serve to introduce those candidates to the American people. 75% of Democrats say they like their lineup of candidates. Unfortunately, only 50% of Republicans say they like their choices. Either the Republican exchange will serve to broaden support among the existing candidates or it will add momentum to former Senator Fred Thompson (R-TN) to run. Thompson has been scoring near 20% of the vote although he is not yet a candidate. That is a clear sign that Republicans don’t care much for their field.
People might run look at the national media meat-grinder and decide not to vote. That would be tragic for the nation. I keep hearing about the need to run a third-party candidate. The problem is the major parties have rigged the process so that only a billionaire has a chance to run. New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg is said to be considering a run, although his interest seems to have waned. Bloomberg, in running for re-election as Mayor of New York, spent extraordinarily. He trounced his opponents. Bloomberg has received a great deal of coverage as “Mayor Mike,” a cheerleader for the revival of New York City. If he ran he would have to fight his image as a Northeastern liberal. Bloomberg is the owner of media properties and has run a city with a budget larger than that of most nations. Could he win? In 1992 H. Ross Perot drew 19% of the vote by spending his own money. But before he withdrew from the fray, claiming that the Republicans were trying to ruin his daughter’s wedding, he actually had been leading both President George Herbert Walker Bush (the incumbent) and Governor William J. (Bill) Clinton. By the time Perot re-entered the race he had been tainted as a crazy candidate, so he no longer was competitive with Bush and Clinton but still did better than any national candidate since Governor George C. Wallace in 1968. Perot carried a greater popular vote but Wallace carried more States than any candidate since Senator Robert M. LaFollette, running against incumbent President Calvin Coolidge (R) and John W. Davis (D) in 1924. Following the Wallace and Perot runs the national parties made it harder and harder for a non-billionaire candidate to win.
Unless the Republican group of candidates begins to excite the voters, or a candidate such as Thompson steps in to run, whoever ends up as the Democratic nominee for President will be the odds-on favorite to win the Presidency. That means President Bush is likely to close out a Republican era when he finishes the end of his second term in 2009. In fact, major political observers say if the Democrats don’t win, and thus the Republicans win a third straight term, it would likely be the end of the Democratic Party. Perhaps. But after President Gerald R. Ford lost in 1976 I recall comparable predictions. Yet it was just one term later that Ronald W. Reagan won the Presidency and for the first time since 1953 a Republican Senate was elected.
I believe it is clear that America likes the two-party system. On the other hand, there is a current belief that neither party is listening to the public. We will see how well the Democrats do in 2008. If they are seen to understanding the concerns of the average American they will win and win big. On the other hand if the Democrats are seen as weak, as they were in 1972, they will lose and lose big. Right now any serious observer would bet on the Democrats.
--A Free Congress Foundation Commentary. Paul M. Weyrich is Chairman and CEO of the Free Congress Foundation.
Comments
It seems inconceivable that such a weak field of Democratic candidates could possibly take the White House, until one gets a gander at the pathetic gaggle of weaklings the Republicans are fielding. The third-tier candidates in both parties, Ron Paul, Tom Tancredo, Dennis Kucinich, and Mike Gravel, are generally the only ones even remotely interesting. How could anyone with a soul vote for Hillary Clinton or Mitchell Romney?
Click to flag this comment as abusive
“The Israel Factor: Ranking the presidential candidates” is a special project published by Haaretz, the Israeli daily newspaper. Obama was ranked a lowly 3.88 on a 1 to 10 scale on account of his recent pro-palestinian faux pas.
So, leaving nothing to chance, the Israel Lobby managed to insert two questions for the presidential candidates. The first question was pretty generic and simply required them to state that Israel is America’s top ally. But if they failed the first question, they got a second chance thanks to a SCRIPTED fallback question!
Yes! It’s actually scripted! Here’s a piece of the debate’s transcript where Obama failed question one:
Brian Williams: We have to do a little bit of housekeeping here, and that is this. Our NBC stations across the state of South Carolina have been carrying this live on over-the-air and cable television. We’re going to say goodbye to them. We will continue on MSNBC, on cable and the Internet with our conversation. This brings us into the final half-hour of tonight’s conversation, and we’re going to shift categories now to what we are calling non-Iraq foreign policy.
Senator Obama, what are America’s three most important allies around the world?
Senator Obama: Well, I think the European Union as a whole has been a long-standing ally of ours. And through NATO, we’ve been able to make some significant progress. Afghanistan, in particular, is an area where we should be focusing. NATO has made real contributions there. Unfortunately, because of the distraction of Iraq, we have not finished the job in terms of making certain that we are driving back the Taliban, stabilizing the Karzai government, capturing bin Laden and making sure that we’ve rooted out terrorism in that region. We also have to look east, because increasingly the center of gravity in this world is shifting to Asia. Japan has been an outstanding ally of ours for many years, but obviously China is rising, and it’s not going away. They’re neither our enemy nor our friend. They’re competitors. But we have to make sure that we have military-to-military contact and forge enough of a relationship with them that we can stabilize the region. That’s something I’d like to do as president.
Brian Williams: Senator, thanks. I’ll give up a follow-up. I didn’t hear you mention Israel, and I ask because there is a quote attributed to your name. You said recently, “No one is suffering more than the Palestinian people.” Do you stand by that remark?
Senator Obama: Well, keep in mind what the remark, actually, if you have the whole thing, said. What I said is, nobody has suffered more than the Palestinian people from the failure of the Palestinian leadership to recognize Israel, to renounce violence and to get serious about negotiated peace and security for the region. Israel has been one of our most important allies around the world. It’s the only established democracy in the Middle East. But the United States has to get engaged in this region, and that’s something that this president has not done. That’s something that I intend to do.
--------
Bob’s Riddle: All anti-white racists agree that it’s ok for whites to become minorities in their own countries. All anti-white racists also agree that a Japanese person who wants to become a minority in his own country is either a traitor or clinically insane. Therefore, what is an anti-white racist? Answer
Click to flag this comment as abusive
riley o keefe- well put about hillary and romney.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
America likes its current bi-factional one-party state? Is that insane or what! The fact that what passes for politics, or the ham fisted scripted excuses put forth as “debates”, touted endlessly, mind-numbingly, to the proles as being “democratic” or civilized, is just one more sad joke in a long line of two-party gang rapes we’re forced every two years to endure. This is the way it is because those in power wish it to be so and anyone who strays of the reservation is labeled a kook or “unelectable”. So if anyone tells me again that we’ve some wonderful system, or how “free” we are, I think I’ll pass on the opportunity. Why participate in my own screwing.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Post a Comment
By submitting this form, you give Taki's Magazine permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. Personal attacks, ethnic slurs, the riding of hobby horses and the beating of dead ones will be deleted as soon as they are detected by our small but alert staff. Repeat abusers of this policy will be barred from leaving comments. All comments reflect only the views of those posting them and not necessarily those of this website, its editors, or authors. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.
Commenting is not available in this section entry.