The Real Bastille Day
Remember when the L.A. riots spun out of control, and engulfed the whole United States? The key moment was no doubt when police and Army commanders took fright and changed sides, throwing their support to the Committee for Public Safety led by Tom Hayden, along with Noam Chomsky, Barbara Boxer, Michael Moore, and Edward Said. After Hayden’s fall and execution, his successor, Marion Barry, insisted that President Bush and his wife Barbara be tried for treason. Their executions shocked the world but sparked wild celebrations in the capital, as the First Couple’s severed heads danced on poles in daylong parades. A crack whore was duly enshrined in the National Cathedral as the Goddess of Reason.
Of course, Hayden and Barry were each executed in due course, and replaced by the "incorruptible" Maxine Waters. The ensuing Terror killed tens of thousands including corporate executives, Indian software engineers, Korean grocers, many harmless courtiers and celebrities such as Liz Taylor, Goldie Hawn, Bill Cosby and Adam Sandler, and unnumbered professors, priests, ministers and cloistered nuns , all accused of "subversion."
When conservatives rose up in Arkansas and Louisiana, the Army crushed the counterrevolution, crowded its supporters onto rafts on the Mississippi, then sank them, drowning thousands of unarmed civilians. The Terror only ended when General Louis Farrakhan used a " whiff of grapeshot " to cow the mob. His ruthless secret police calmed the chaos at home – ended the church burnings and massacres, for instance – but his foreign policy adventurism started wars with Mexico, Canada, Great Britain and finally Russia, ending only with his ignominious defeat and exile to Staten Island. But all this is ancient history now. The Revolution and its wars have ended, at a cost of over 20 million lives, and the U.S. standard of living now equals Serbia’s. Was it all worth it?
That little thought experiment should give you an idea of what the French Revolution was really like – a digestive eruption of all the basest instincts in the lowest elements of society, led by power-drunk ideologues of the radical Left. (If you click on the link for any of the imaginary events given above, you’ll find its real-life parallel in the French Revolution.) It was utterly unlike the American rebellion against the English colonial officials – which amounted to a regional secession, led by the responsible members of the upper middle class. And for that fact we should be forever grateful, as should other countries which emulated the American model of political reform, rather than the French, as Hannah Arendt and Wilhelm Röpke have written.
Of course, apologists for the Revolution will point to the inequalities and injustices of the Ancien Regime as justification for the bloodbath. So do revolutionaries justify every excess; so did leftists in Los Angeles, pointing to the genuine misery, squalor and stagnation lived by so many members of the urban underclass. Looking back, we see that black slaves in America at the Founding lived much worse lives than did poor Frenchmen, and had vastly fewer rights. Would that have justified a massive slave rebellion, ending with the murder of George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and every other slave-owning aristocrat? Some far-left professors on American campuses might argue just this. Their position is not some racially-motivated eccentricity, but the logical outcome of the fashionable, conventionally accepted position that the French Revolution was a justified, progressive event in history. If you think French peasants had the right to guillotine King Louis, then you must say that black slaves would have been right to hang George Washington. To accept the American Revolution, you must reject the French.
Indeed, the gap in wealth, privilege, and power between a third-generation welfare mother and, say, a 1992 Hollywood movie executive, was probably greater than that separating a French peasant from an aristocrat. Would that justify throwing George Lucas into jail, then guillotining him? Not even Jar-Jar Binks merits him that.
Speaking of film, a recent classic by the French master director Eric Rohmer depicts the reality of the Revolution much better than I can, and without using belabored historical metaphors, as I must. In The Lady and the Duke, a gripping drama in now available on DVD, Rohmer adapts the memoirs of Grace Dalrymple Elliot, a kind-hearted conservative English lady caught up in the nightmare that was Revolutionary Paris. A former lover, and still a friend, of the squishy-left aristocrat, the Duc d’Orleans, Grace watches in horror as the hard-left takes over the city – imposing upon Paris, hitherto the sophisticated, cosmopolitan capital of Western Culture, a xenophobic, bloody, totalitarian state, complete with secret police, greedy informers, passbooks, political prisoners, and executions of the rich, the foreign, the dissenting, and the merely unlucky.
"Death to the Austrian woman," the blood-crazed rabble cried, marching through burning streets to demand the murder of a queen – and they got it. Why was Marie Antoinette executed? (Hint: She never said "Let them eat cake" – that urban myth had been invented 100 years before, to defame another foreign Queen of France.) The lovely, brave, devout Marie Antoinette – who as a girl had flirted with the boy Mozart while he played the piano – was caged like an animal for months, watching her maltreated boy, Louis, die slowly of disease. Then she was dragged off to be beheaded. Why? Mainly for being foreign, and having had more wit than her husband, enough to try to resist the collapse of her adopted country into subhuman chaos. But most aristocrats depicted in this film have no such good sense or courage.
At the heart of this exquisite movie is the relationship between Grace and the Duc d’Orleans. The latter is a pampered, ambitious, not very bright cousin to the tragic King Louis XVI, a Duke who throws his weight and wealth behind the Revolutionaries, in the hope that they will place him on the throne. He spouts, and no doubt believes, the new rhetoric of hysterical, xenophobic revolutionary patriotism – which would soon spread to Germany and Italy, planting the seeds of both the Nazi and Fascist movements. You can taste blood in the lyrics of the loathsomely catchy jingle La Marseillaise:
To arms, oh citizens!
Form up in serried ranks!
March on, march on!
And drench our fields
With their tainted blood!
Supreme devotion to our Motherland
Guides and sustains avenging hands.
The "tainted blood" of class enemies – anyone born an aristocrat, whether rich or impoverished, and any priest loyal to Rome – and racial enemies (principally foreigners) did indeed flow. The Duc d’Orleans defends the Terror, as necessary to "purge" the French nation of impurities and treasonous elements; that is, of anyone who refused to march behind the totalitarian leaders of the Revolution, who refused to subsume his individuality in the "general will" of Jean-Jacques Rousseau the theologian of society-as-anthill. (For Star Trek fans, Rousseau’s political philosophy can be summed up in two words: The Borg.)
Grace was appalled, keeping alive her friendship with the Duke in order to exert some influence on him, to urge him and his other "moderate" revolutionary allies among the aristocracy and the army to crush the rebellion before it turned on them. Even as Orleans votes for the judicial murder of his own cousin, the King, Grace risks death repeatedly to save the life of a hunted aristocrat whom she barely knows – simply because it’s the right thing to do. The moral contrast between this pious English émigré and the scheming, foolish Duke, points up the contrast between the aristocrats who led the American Revolution, and those who launched the French. Our leaders were sound, sober, cautious and moderate, grounding their grievances against the British king in English Common Law, the rights of local governments, and countless carefully reasoned judicial and legal precedents. The French aristocrats who voted with the ideologues and the Mob to murder their king were irresponsible, frivolous, and finally cowardly – and most of them ended up on the scaffold, like the poor Duc d’Orleans. Every radical revolution eats its young – as the intellectuals of France, then Russia, Germany, and Cambodia (to name a few) would learn.
There were reasons why the French upper classes were so irresponsible, and they went back to the 17th Century. Even as British kings were forced by Parliament and people to revive and respect the medieval privileges of local liberty and limited government, King Louis the Fourteenth, the "Sun-King," trampled and crushed local elites, herded the aristocrats into Versailles, persecuted religious minorities, defied the Pope, squashed the liberty of the French church, and gathered all power to Paris, into the hands of an absolutist executive. He turned the once rich and complex political fabric of France, celebrated by the great Montesquieu, into a brittle autocracy, which would collapse at the first hammer blow. That blow would come when his descendant King Louis XVI bankrupted his kingdom – ironically, by financing the American Revolution. By then, the upper classes of France had been dilettantes and parlor philosophes for generations, and were utterly unsuited to embark on moderate political reform. They were the prototypes for America’s spoiled Boomers, who manned the barricades and burned the colleges in the 1960s.
Ironically, the best source for learning about what went right in America, and wrong in France, is the work of a French aristocrat, Alexis de Tocqueville. He understood better than any U.S. native the roots of our liberty, and he looked across the Atlantic with jealous admiration. Reading him, and studying other works depicting the Revolution and its horrors, have forever spoiled for me the sight of the Tricolor, and the sound of La Marseillaise, a song which was really the predecessor to the "Horst Wessel Lieder":
Millions, full of hope, look up at the swastika;
The day breaks for freedom and for bread.
For the last time the call will now be blown;
For the struggle now we all stand ready.
Soon will fly Hitler-flags over every street;
Slavery will last only a short time longer.
Flag high, ranks closed,
The S.A. marches with silent solid steps.
Comrades shot by the Red Front and Reaction
march in spirit with us in our ranks.
But La Marseillaise is a fun and catchy song, with a rousing melody that can move a mob into action. It seems a pity to waste it. So I present it here in another form: a parody written by the Catholic peasants of the Vendée and Brittany who rose up in 1791 and fought a three-year war in defense of King and Church. In the end, they were crushed by overwhelming force, and massacred in the hundreds of thousands. Indeed, the revolutionary government decreed a policy of deliberate genocide against the regions—a fact considered unmentionable in France to this day; one historian told me that she dared not write about these events for fear of “never working in France again.” Alexander Solzshenitsyn was willing to point it out when he came in 1993 to mark the opening of the Vendée Memorial.
The heroic resistance of these lightly armed farmers against a professional army helped unseat the atheist radicals in Paris, vault Napoleon Bonaparte into power, and force Napoleon to make a peace treaty (a “concordat”) with the Church. Like their heirs in twentieth-century Mexico, these peasants put a stop to persecution. In their honor, I present the monarchist parody written by a Vendee soldier, which roused these devout Resistance fighters as they marched into battle—with a translation by my good friend Charles Coulombe.
John Zmirak is author of The Bad Catholic’s Guide to Wine, Whiskey and Song.
La Marseillaise des Blancs (MP3)
I
Allons armées catholiques
Le jour de gloire est arrivé !
Contre nous de la république
L’étendard sanglant est levé (repeat)
Entendez-vous dans nos campagnes
Les cris impurs des scélérats ?
Qui viennent jusque dans nos bras
Prendre nos filles, nos femmes !
Refrain:
Aux armes vendéens !
Formez vos bataillons !
Marchez, marchez,
Le sang des bleus
Rougira nos sillons !
II
Quoi des infâmes hérétiques
Feraient la loi dans nos foyers?
Quoi des muscardins de boutiques
Nous écraseraient sous leurs pieds? (Repeat)
Et le Rodrigue abominable
Infâme suppôt du démon
S’installerait en la maison
De notre Jésus adorable
Refrain
III
Tremblez pervers et vous timides,
La bourrée des deux partis.
Tremblez, vos intrigues perfides
Vont enfin recevoir leur prix. (Repeat)
Tout est levé pour vous combattre
De Saint Jean d’Monts à Beaupréau,
D’Angers à la ville d’Airvault,
Nos gars ne veulent que se battre.
Refrain
IV
Chrétiens, vrais fils de l’Eglise,
Séparez de vos ennemis
La faiblesse à la peur soumise
Que verrez en pays conquis. (Repeat)
Mais ces citoyens sanguinaires
Mais les adhérents de Camus
Ces prêtres jureurs et intrus
Cause de toutes nos misères.
Refrain
V
Ô sainte Vierge Marie
Conduis, soutiens nos bras vengeurs!
Contre une sequelle ennemie
Combats avec tes zélateurs! (Repeat)
A vos étendards la victoire
Est promise assurément.
Que le régicide expirant
Voie ton triomphe et notre gloire!
Refrain
Translation by Charles A. Coulombe
I
Let us go, Catholic armies
the day of glory arrived!
Against us, the Republic
Has raised the bloody banner. (Repeat)
Do you hear in our countryside
the impure cries of the wretches?
Who come—unless our arms prevent them—
To take our daughters, our wives!
Refrain
To arms, Vendeeans!
Form your battalions!
March, march,
The blood of the blues [revolutionaries]
Will redden our furrows!
II
What of the infamous heretics
Who would make the law in our homes?
What of the mercenary cowards
Who would crush us under their feet? (Repeat)
And abominable Rodrigue [Antoine Rodrigue, a local bishop who defied papal authority to cooperate with the Revolution]
Infamous henchman of the demon
Who would settle in the house
Of our adorable Jesus?
Refrain
III
Tremble you perverse and timid,
Before the bonfires of the adversaries.
Tremble, your perfidious intrigues
shall finally receive their due. (Repeat)
All are raised to fight you
From Saint Jean d’Monts to Beaupréau,
From Angers to the town of Airvault,
Our lads want to only fight.
Refrain
IV
Christians, true sons of the Church,
Reject your enemies and
The weakness and the servile fear
Which you see in a conquered country. (Repeat)
But these bloody “citizens,”
These allies of Camus, [No, not the philosopher. . . . Armand-Gaston Camus, Secretary of the Revolutionary Convention, who led in the move to seize Church property and execute the king.]
These treasonous and imposed priests [This refers to the “Constitutional” priests who had sworn loyalty to the government over the pope, and were rewarded with the parishes of priests who refused; the latter were considered heroes.]
Are the cause of all our miseries.
Refrain
V
O Blessed Virgin Mary,
Lead and support our avenging arms!
Against an enemy gang,
fight alongside your zealous warriors! (Repeat)
To your standards
is promised certain victory.
The regicides’ death
Shall be your triumph and our glory!
Refrain
Comments
For “bleus” substitute rouges;
for “conservative”
Tory; for neoconservative New Whig.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Mr. Zmirak has given us a scathing indictment of the FR; I wonder how he would explain its enduring popularity with the French people (and others). I believe that Mr. Coulombe would not support Mr. Zmirak’s rosy view of the American Revolution. A monarchist cannot muster much enthusiasm for an anti-royal revolt!
Click to flag this comment as abusive
I would probably take ANY type of revolution in the US right about now.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
I most certainly would NOT welcome just any revolution in the US right about now. Far too many revolutionaries deny the people they claim to be helping essential rights of life, liberty, and property. No thank you!
see my blog at http://arkanabar.blogspot.com ! You may be the first to read it!
Click to flag this comment as abusive
In the context of the so-called Age of Enlightenment, the American and French Revolutions were fought under the same principles of Rousseauist-Masonic democratism. The overpowering of valid, legal authority by these revolutions was a victory for naturalism over the supernatural ordering of human society in the West as it had developed during the Medieval Age. In essence, these revolutions were anti-Catholic and brought into being the SECULAR STATE.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
no article on conrad bleak? what’s up?
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Oh dear. Zmirak equated the Nazis’ anthem with evil. Careful, John Zmirak; if you say the Nazi Party was categorically evil then some of the American nationalists among us will accuse you of being a Roosevelt sympathiser, and from there (in their twisted logic) it’s just a short step to being accused of aiding and abetting Stalin and the Bolsheviks and the cause of, well, anti-Christian revolution…
Click to flag this comment as abusive
A crack whore was duly enshrined in the National Cathedral as the Goddess of Reason.
That part still could happen.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Mr. Meng comments that both the American and French revolutions were “in essence… anti-Catholic and brought about the secular state.”
There is no doubt that the French revolution was anti-Catholic. But the American? It was fought against an officially Protestant power that until 1829 denied Roman Catholics the franchise, the right to be elected to public office, or to hold military or naval commissions; and until 1858 required anyone matriculating at its public universities to swear adherence to the Thirty-Nine Articles of the Church of England.
Pray tell us, Mr. Meng, how was the American revolution, as a result of which Roman Catholics were relieved of all these disabilities imposed by English law, “anti-Catholic”?
Click to flag this comment as abusive
In response to M.S.S.’s request: Besides the fact that Catholics were marginalized and discriminated against during the Colonial Period of our history, the real reason there was an American revolution was due to the Quebec Act of June, 1774. The English historian Cardinal Aidan Gasquet declared that “The American Revolution was not a movement for civil and religious liberty; its principal cause was the bigoted rage of the American Puritan and Presbyterian ministers at the concession of full religious liberty and equality to Catholics of French Canada.” Also, you might want to reference the Suffolk County Resolves of September 1774. In fact, the very first offensive conducted by the Americans was an invasion against Quebec in 1775 under Benedict Arnold (wounded) and Richard Montgomery (KIA). But it was beaten back by the governor, Guy Carleton. Also, it is a fact that none of the leaders of the American Revolution were friendly to Catholics, except to the three compromisers of the Faith, the Carroll brothers. The spirit that animated the leaders was a combination of Protestantism and freemasonry--neither of which have been or are favorable to Catholicism.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
To Mr. Meng,
Your analysis of the causes of the American revolution is, to say the least, unique.
There were few Roman Catholics in the United States and I submit that there is very little if any evidence that the Founders intended to persecute them to any greater degree than the British already did. The practical effect of the American revolution was to emancipate American Catholics from the disabilities to which British law subjected them well into the nineteenth century.
As for freemasonry, it is hard to see how it had any political or religious effect on the American revolution, since “regular” Anglo-American freemasonry strictly forbade and still forbids the discussion of politics and religion in its lodges. Only nine out of 56 signers of the Declaration of Independence were freemasons, a percentage that would probably have been found amongst loyal British subjects of comparable political and social rank. Please tell us in what way freemasonry influenced (say) Washington or Franklin that it did not also influence Lord Cornwallis or HRH the Duke of Sussex.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
To M.S.S.—you may think my analysis is unique, but it is a matter of history, despite your apparent skepticism and the failure of textbooks to explain it. Yes, your are correct, there were few Catholics in colonial America at the time of the Revolution, approximately 20,000 to 30,000 or about 1 percent of the total population, centered primarily in Maryland and Pennsylvania. It doesn’t matter whether “the Founders intended to persecute them to any greater degree than the British already did” or not. The climate was anti-Catholic. New England was particularly fanatic in this regard. As for Catholics benefiting from the American victory, it was a mixed blessing in that Catholics were seduced [thanks to Fr. John Carroll] into confusing true patriotism with devotion to the religion of individualism, democratism, and Pluralism. This goes contrary to perennial Catholic social doctrine eloquently summarized in Pope Leo XIII’s encyclical Immortale Dei, where he states most unequivocally, “To hold, therefore, that there is no difference in matters of religion between forms that are unlike each other, and even contrary to each other, most clearly leads in the end to the rejection of all religion in both theory and practice. And this is the same thing as atheism.” Look around you, can you see a vibrant, spiritually healthy United States? As I said before, the Founding Fathers were either anti-Catholic or totally indifferent to it. They were imbued with the spirit of Rationalism, which is a mark of the spirit of Freemasonry. As various popes have formally enunciated, Freemasonry, by its very nature and purpose, seeks to destroy both the religious and the Christian social order, particularly as it is posited by the Catholic Church. How else explain the secular nature of our Constitution. Our Lord Jesus Christ is not mentioned once in it, nor is the word “God”. In my opinion, this is anti-Catholic.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
sic semper tyranis
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Neither is God mentioned in the Uniform Commercial Code, or in Littleton, Coke, or Blackstone except incidentally. Christianity is not a legalistic religion like Islam or Judaism. Christian societies have secular law to govern secular matters, as commanded by Christ - “render unto Caesar what is Caesar, and unto God what is God’s.
You still haven’t explained how freemasonry influenced American freemasons differently than it did English freemasons, who have included amongst their numbers several royal dukes, archbishops of Canterbury, etc. A willingness to adduce factual evidence, citations of literature, etc., in support of your points, as opposed to the bald assertion of opinion, is the hallmark of reasonable and civil discourse.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
I am also with Mr. Meng. The American revolution was called “The Presbyterian War” for it was radical leveller Protestants that fomented it. Many of the FFofA were humanists as well as schooled in the Enlightenment that was essentially anti-Catholic, anti-hierarchical, occultist, kabbalist, etc. The Enlightenment was a rebellion against the Catholic Church and the Temporal Order. Many saw the American revolution as a continuation of Englands Great Revolution, the revolution of Cromwell that killed the king and disbanded the House of Lords.
There is practically nothing “conservative” about the American revolution; it was a crime. England’s Great Revolution, the American Revolution and the French Revolution are all interconnected and all three were evil. I would have been a loyalist that fought for King, Church, and country.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
The US had its “French-style” Revolution less than a hundred years lter, in the Civil War. Lincoln didn’t accept the rightful demand of southern states to secede, so he forced a disastrious war on the nation, suspended Habeas Corpus and jailed anyone who opposed him.
The military campaigns were cruel and brutal. SHerman’s marcho to the sea, the burning of Atlanta, all were portents of modern warfare. And from that came and from that came the monolitic Federal Government that rules you today
Click to flag this comment as abusive
I would have liked to see George Washington lynched by his Black slaves…
Click to flag this comment as abusive
I will not buy anything French or made in France, in protest at what the mob did to Princess Marie Thérèse Louise of Savoy-Carignan, Princess of Lamballe. Her repeated rape, murder, dismemberment and the vilification of her severed head by the mob of drunken ‘freedom-fighters’ tell me enough of the Gallic mentality. On Bastille Day, say a prayer in her memory.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
John: If you can read Spanish, here are two articles
I wrote about the French REvolution for a Spanish
catholic magazine, ARBIL.
http://www.arbil.org/112adri.htm
http://www.arbil.org/112pena.htm
In Europe there is a curious dichotomy in the necons
there, they hate the jacobins and Robespierre, but
have the utmost respect for the early phase of the
Revolution. Of course, that is nonsense. The historian
Palmer notes that when Robespierre comes to power the
state of France was war from without, civil war from
withing, economic collapse, and looming danger of
massive famines. This was the doing of those early,
moderate revolutionaries, after being in charge for two
three years of a rich and peaceful country (one can
almost feel sympathy for Robespierre for being stuck
with such a disaster).
But of course, those moderate revolutionaries declared
war on the rest of Europe to bring the blessing of
democracy to them, so of course, they are worthy of
respect.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Great discussion about religions, masonry, and revolutions.
here is the distinction that is overlooked; French masonry as in Illuminati aided George Washington in war against british Masonry.
Thus, the United States is a corporation from the Virginia-British company and is the multi-headed hydra of mystery. A bootom-line bully-boy for the Vatican for a while until the Illuminati pulls the plug
Click to flag this comment as abusive
The DVD, “The Lady and the Duke” is available on Netflix.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Post a Comment
By submitting this form, you give Taki's Magazine permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. Personal attacks, ethnic slurs, the riding of hobby horses and the beating of dead ones will be deleted as soon as they are detected by our small but alert staff. Repeat abusers of this policy will be barred from leaving comments. All comments reflect only the views of those posting them and not necessarily those of this website, its editors, or authors. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.
Commenting is not available in this section entry.