The Wines of Provence and the Armies of Allah
The region of France with the oldest claim to civilization is Provence, whose Mediterranean coast was honeycombed with Greek colonies as early as 600 B.C., of which the most important was Massalia (later Marseilles). The Hellenes brought with them the written alphabet, diverse and (ahem!) innovative sexual practices, philosophical discourse, and the art of making wine. Since these are precisely the cultural attributes about which Frenchmen still boast today, it behooves us as residents of the Hellenic colony of Astoria, NewYork, to remind the Frogs where they learned it all—from the Greeks. It was Grecian colonists who introduced the rude, blue-painted Celts to techniques of cultivating vineyards, planting the grapes which would thrive there for the next 2,600 years.
One of the oldest varieties in Europe, the Ugni grape dates back to the first Greek settlements—and still forms the backbone (if not quite the taste bud) of wine making. The most widely planted white grape in France, it also accounts on its own for a third of Italian white wine—filling carafes of $8 Trebbiano for impecunious college students on first dates even today. As you may have gathered, Ugni is not the finest or most interesting grape. It’s beloved by winemakers for its hardiness in bad weather and tendency to grow abundantly even in bad conditions. When one’s most delicate grapes wither and die, he can count on the Ugni to keep springing up and keeping the barrels full. Its plain, almost neutral flavor makes it useful as the base to which other, more flavorful varieties can be added, and also lends itself to distillation. Juice from Ugni grapes forms the backbone of many cognacs and brandies, and at least one brand of vodka—Ciroc, whose producers boast they still employ the techniques introduced by tenth-century Benedictines of the Abbey of St. Michel.
The Greeks did more than teach the Gauls how to plant the grape. They inducted the Gauls into the vast, pan-Mediterranean economy of trade, which linked in a web of growing prosperity the forests of Scotland with the granaries of Egypt, the purple factories of Tyre, and the spice merchants who carried their wares along the great Silk Road from Asia. This benevolent globalism is the single factor which, according to historian Henri Pirenne, allowed the Mediterranean region to become the most prosperous and advanced culture in the world. The wealth that resulted from this web of complementary trade is what lifted all of Europe and the Middle East from the Iron Age, and made possible the empires of Persia and later of Rome. If a metaphor helps, imagine the Mediterranean as a vast octopus of prosperity, with its head somewhere near Crete, tentacles reaching to Portugal, Scotland, Morocco, and India, exuding instead of ink the many varieties of worldly goods which traversed the wine-dark sea.
So how did this vast, mutually beneficial system of trade give way to the chaos and near-starvation which marked the Dark Ages? Traditionally, historians have pointed to the fall of Rome, the collapse of central authority and the incursion of vast numbers of untutored tribes of barbarians into Gaul and even Italy. Indeed, the sniffy Whig historian Edward Gibbon faulted the Christian Church for the empire’s collapse, and hence the next 700 years of relative darkness. But Pirenne offers another explanation, and one I like much better: He blames the Moslems.
Okay, he doesn’t really blame them. When an army of theologically motivated conquerors try to bring down the “infidel” civilization of their enemies, who can really blame them? Our own Puritan founders did the same favor for the Indians, and the Spaniards for the Aztecs. It seems to arise from a basic human urge to obliterate otherness, and far be it from me to moralize about this sort of thing. Nevertheless, as partisans of European civilization and peoples (I like to root for the underdog), I can’t resist pointing to Pirenne. In his ground-breaking history Mohammed and Charlemagne, Pirenne argues from archaeological and documentary evidence that the fall of the Roman empire was not in fact a catastrophe, that the disruptions of order which accompanied the fall of Rome were not sufficient to wreck the ancient economy. He shows the continued use of currency, the widespread trade and relative prosperity which continued under “barbarian” rulers who claimed continuity with Rome, learned to read and write in Latin, and quickly adopted Catholicism. To most residents of the old Roman empire, Pirenne argues, between the fifth and seventh centuries, the switchover from rule by Roman generals commanding barbarian armies to barbarians commanding themselves was not all that traumatic. In fact, life went on much as before.
So what happened to turn wealthy sixth-century Gaul into the howling wasteland it would become just a hundred years later? According to Pirenne, it was the Islamic conquest of the Middle East and North Africa, which cut Europe off from the ancient centers of grain production in Egypt, and Asiatic trade in Syria and Persia. Returning for a moment to my metaphorical cephalopod, it’s as if the tentacles of the Mediterranean octopus reaching into Europe had been hacked off. One of the first measures the new Islamic occupiers of these still mostly Christian regions took upon conquering the countries was to cut off all trade with France, Italy, and any other region inhabited by infidels. This draconian economic boycott had devastating effects, Pirenne reports—helping within a century or two to virtually destroy urban civilization in Europe, whose towns could no longer sustain their populations. He documents how cities such as Rome and Marseilles dwindled in size and wealth, ceasing to be cosmopolitan centers of trade, and shrinking into feudal forts surrounded by struggling farms. Instead of exporting wine to Africa and importing grain from Egypt, the Christians of regions such as Provence were reduced to a simple, subsistence economy. Those in Spain were simply conquered by Moslem invaders, and subjugated for 700 years. While this meant religious persecution, it at least entitled them to take part in the vast Islamic economy—which helps explain the so-called “golden age” of medieval Spain.
As for the winemakers, Islamic invasion frequently meant the end of their industry. As Desmond Seward notes in Monks and Wine:
In the tenth century, much of southern France was ravaged by Moors, whose unwelcome presence is still commemorated by the Montagnes des Maures. True to their prophet, they uprooted the heinous vine wherever they met it; according to the Koran, “there is a devil in every berry of the grape.” (p. 47)
These vines, which had flourished for over 1,200 years, were painstakingly replanted in most cases by Benedictine monks, the only men educated and organized enough to undertake this delicate task. In the Bandol wine region near Marseilles, the monks of the Abbey of St. Victor in the eleventh century restored the vineyards which produced Clairette, Sauvignon, and of course the Ugni grape.
The Abbey of St. Victor was an ancient center of Christian preaching in Provence. It was founded by the important theologian St. John Cassian in the 400s in an abandoned quarry that had been turned into a secret Christian cemetery. From the Church’s earliest years, Christians had made a practice of conducting the liturgy on the tombs of holy people and venerating the relics of the dead. This gave rise to the custom, current today, of placing in every Catholic altar a saint’s relic. Indeed, priests who are traveling in hostile regions without access to such altars carry an “altar cloth” with the bones, hair, or other relics of a saint sewn into the fabric, so they can make an altar out of any flat surface at need.
This abbey contained, most famously, the body of St. Victor (hence its name), a Roman officer executed in the second century for refusing to worship the emperor. It also boasted, tradition tells, fragments of the cross on which St. Andrew was killed, the clothes of the Virgin Mary and St. Mary Magdalene, and even the coffins which held the Holy Innocents slain by King Herod. Okay, so sometimes “tradition” likes to fib. (In reality, this was the site where Jesus and Mary Magdalene honeymooned, before taking off to found a goddess religion and sire a race of bumbling Merovingian monarchs. I know this for a fact: I read it on the beach.)
This abbey was destroyed several times by invaders during the chaos and poverty that descended on the region in the wake of its artificially induced economic collapse. The Benedictines built a new abbey on the site in the tenth century, which quickly became a center for evangelizing the region. The monks prudently built around their chapel an enormous fortress, with an eye to the still-rampaging Saracens, Vikings, and even Magyars. (Perhaps you haven’t dealt with many Hungarians, but if you have, you know they do still sometimes revert to type—unlike the poor Scandinavians, who seem to have entirely lost their “edge.” As for the Saracens… check today’s newspaper.)
The abbey became famous for its faithfulness to the Benedictine Rule, and its monks helped reform dozens of other monasteries throughout Europe. Two former abbots of St. Victor rose to become popes—albeit Avignon popes.
The abbey was destroyed, like nearly everything else of value in France, during the Revolution (See Drinking Song #7)—whose partisans tore down hundreds of historic churches, including the enormous Abbey of Cluny, one of the greatest cultural centers of European history, an exquisite building almost the size of St. Peter’s in Rome. It was blown up, and a highway built through its ruins.
As the post-Christian French—to the horror of the faithful remnant among them—complete the deconstruction of their Christian heritage, the heirs of the Moors and Saracens who once again populate Provence and other regions in prodigious, fertile numbers, meekly wait their turn to inherit the earth. If and when they do, I expect that the vast, green fields of Ugni grapes will once again be torn up and burned. So drink the stuff while you can.
Excerpted from The Bad Catholic’s Guide to Wine, Whiskey and Song
CELEBRATE: There is something of a mild baby boom occurring among the Christian French, and a stirring of Christian practice. Besides the admirable bands of Traditionalists who have kept alive the ancient liturgy of the Church and the cultural heritage of France, lay movements such as the Emmanuel and the Bethlehem communities are reviving an interest among the young in the faith of their grandfathers (or more likely, grandmothers). Toast their efforts with a bottle of Bandol blanc, over a steaming plate of the delicious dish from southwestern France, cassoulet. It’s a complex, exquisite concoction of duck fat, white beans, and pork skin—a batch takes two days to properly make and a solid week to finish eating. It’s perhaps my favorite dish in this book.
WARNING: This dish is not halal.
Recipe by Denise Matychowiak--with a doff of the hat to Paula Wolfert.
Cassoulet
Day 1
2 pounds dried white beans
¾ pound fresh pork skin
Salt and freshly ground pepper
4 pounds bone-in pork shoulder, cut for stew
5 tablespoons goose fat
2 onions, chopped
3 carrots, cut in rounds
8-ounce piece of pancetta
1 head garlic, whole
1 tablespoon tomato paste
2 quarts chicken stock
Sprig parsley, thyme, bay leaf, and celery tied together
Rinse and pick through beans for any foreign rocks or debris.
Soak for 2 hours.
Tie pork skin in a roll and simmer 20 minutes in enough water to cover. Drain.
In large heavy stew pot heat duck fat. Season pork shoulder and brown on all sides. Add onions and carrots. Cook 5 minutes. Add pancetta. Cook another 3 minutes. Add garlic and tomato paste; stir 1 minute. Add stock, pork skin, and herb bundle. Simmer 1 ½ hours.
Drain beans and add to pork ragout. Simmer 1 – 1 ½ hours until beans are done, depending on the freshness of beans. Cool. Skim off fat that has risen to surface and reserve.
Refrigerate overnight.
Day 2
6 duck confit legs
1 pound fresh garlic pork sausage
½ cup fresh bread crumbs
Heat ragout gently on stove to just warm. Remove pork skin and set aside. Remove any bones that are free of meat as well as large pieces of fat. Remove herb bundle and discard. Remove garlic and squeeze back into ragout.
Steam duck legs in a colander over boiling water. Remove meat from bones and set aside.
Preheat oven to 325 degrees.
Unroll the pork skin and cut into strips. Line 2 3-quart ovenproof bowls with the skin— fat side down.
Add ½ ragout to bowls. Scatter duck meat over and cover with remaining ragout. Swirl in reserved fat from Day 1.
Taste and adjust seasoning.
Bake 2 hours.
Brown sausage in skillet and cut into 4-inch pieces.
Reduce oven to 300 degrees.
Place sausage on top and gently press into beans, stirring top level of beans. Cover with bread crumbs.
Cook 1 ½ hours until bread crumbs are browned.
Remove from oven and rest for 20 minutes.
If desired, sprinkle with a tablespoon of melted duck fat.
Serve with a green salad and crusty bread.
Serves 10-12

Comments
Another gem by Mr Zmirak. You rock, you Holy Fool!
There’s an eerie coincidence here, because just a few hours ago, BEFORE I saw this, I was re-reading the exact passage by “the sniffy Whig historian Edward Gibbon” in which he “faulted the Christian Church for the empire’s collapse”. (Chesterton said, “coincidences are spiritual puns.")
I won’t quote the lengthy passage here, but for any interested readers, it’s in Chapter 28 of Gibbon’s “Decline and Fall”.
Hm, another coincidence to consider, is how Gibbon’s very Whiggish “Decline and Fall” was published in the same year as Adam Smith’s “Wealth of Nations”, and the same year as American Independence.
Now that the Modern Age is over and we need to reconstruct and carry on our civilisation out of its partial ruins - lest the ruins become permanently ruinous - maybe it’s high time to contemplate the limitations of the creeds of Gibbons, Smith and yes Jefferson too, and how they are not quite sufficient to guide us through the postmodern (small “p") age in which our civilisation is once again in mortal peril. America’s most vulnerable point, the chink in America’s mental and spiritual armour, is its condition as an almost exclusively Modern Age nation.
On that note - on America’s vulnerability as a nation conditioned by just one historical age among many - cf what Owen Barfield called “chronological snobbery.” Here’s an intro to that concept, from the Barfield website:
“Chronological snobbery is the presumption, fueled by the modern conception of progress, that all thinking, all art, and all science of an earlier time are inherently inferior, indeed childlike or even imbecilic, compared to that of the present. Under the rule of chronological snobbery, the West has convinced itself that “intellectually, humanity languished for countless generations in the most childish errors on all sorts of crucial subjects, until it was redeemed by some simple scientific dictum of the last century"”
http://davidlavery.net/Barfield/
Now, THAT is how REAL conservatives think, or ought to. ;-)
Anyway. Yes it’s very true that the “Dark Ages” weren’t so dark. Just one bit of recent evidence, is the Sutton Hoo treasure (England, circa 630 AD), whose artifacts included items evidencing trade between England and the Mediterranean in the 600s. Furthermore - an even more tantalising clue to what the cosmpolitan world was like in the 600s - there are very close parallels between the legend of the English monk Caedmon and the Chinese Buddhist monk Hui Neng, who (if indeed they were two different people) were near contemporaries of around the 7th century. It SEEMS that their stories (if indeed they were two people) mixed and became conflated through the trade routes from England all the way to China, within just one generation of cosmopolitan commerce from Britain to the Sea of Japan.
And one more observation I can’t resist suggesting, as one more retort to any and all believers in economism among us:
materialist aspirations did not resurrect Western civilisation in the great renaissance of the 12th century (that was the REAL rebirth of the West; the later Renaissance was just an elaboration on the Great Thaw of the 1100s.) Nope, “the market” in and of itself did not resurrect the West. Christianity did. Spiritual aspirations did. The great age of Cathedral-building (circa 1100s) was economically insane, by any abstract analysis. The Gothic Cathedrals, and the cosmopolitan Christian civilisation which gave rise to them (and was raised by them) were NOT created by any amassed interests in “private property” - they were built from spiritual aspirations, and they raised up the economy and technology on their coat-tails.
I think it was Saint-Exupery who said,
“If you want men to build good boats, first teach them how to love the sea.”
Karl Marx believed in the opposite, so stupidly.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
PS, at the risk of presumption, I think Taki would agree with what Saint-Exupery said about boats, at the end of my above comment. ;-)
Click to flag this comment as abusive
“So what happened to turn wealthy sixth-century Gaul into the howling wasteland it would become just a hundred years later? According to Pirenne, it was the Islamic conquest of the Middle East and North Africa.”
Ah, the Islamics are to blame for the dark ages! Of course. I guess if we want to believe the Islamic hordes were able to turn the relatively distant West into a “howling wasteland” by the 7th century, we better ignore the fact that the Eastern Empire was able to survive and even thrive long after that.
Anyway, Bryan Ward Perkins in “The Fall of Rome: And the End of Civilization” disputes the fairly new concept that “between the fifth and seventh centuries, the switchover from rule by Roman generals commanding barbarian armies to barbarians commanding themselves was not all that traumatic.” Ward-Perkins uses archaeological data (everthing for pot shards, to estimates of cattle size, to coinage, to graffiti) to show that fairly soon after the West fell to the barbarians Western Europe’s quality of life, from literacy to luxury to food availability rapidly disintegrated
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Good article Mr. Zmirak,
I would like to comment a couple of things:
First, it does not seem true the Spanish golden age was a consequence of the 7 century Muslim rule in the southern part of the Iberian peninsula. The Spanish golden age was the XVI century precisely after the Muslim were expelled by Isabel and Fernando in 1492. The Spanish golden age involved a cultural revival in music, painting, and the arts in general which never happaned under Muslim rule there, and probably any where else. Plus, it is speculated that the southern regions of Spain which used to have forest were clean cut by the Muslims, the ‘enemies of the trees’ as they were known by the Spaniards. Soemthing similar happened to the northern regions of Africa (Tunez, etc) which exported food till the Mulsims conquered them.
The second point is about the ‘dark ages’. There are many lies about the ‘dark ages’ as opposed to the Rensassaince written in liberal and left history books. I recommend “Pour en finir avec le Moyen Age” by Régine Pernoud (in French) available at Amazon. Pernoud debunks several myths about the ‘dark ages’ being ‘bad’, ‘anti-science’, etc.
H.A.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Hmmmm...... the “infidel” society was disrupted greatly when cut off from the supplies controlled by unfriendly rulers. That sounds strangely familiar....
Please support localized economics!
Click to flag this comment as abusive
This article brings back fond memories of travels to
Provence. Ever since, I enjoy Provence wine, often
rosé wine.
You also remind us that Christianity is a beautiful,
joyful religion, to be treasured and defended. Taki
commented on “Europe’s terminal secular disease” which
almost makes one give up hope, but with God’s help,
Europe can recover.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
“If you want men to build good boats, first teach them how to love the sea.”
Karl Marx believed in the opposite, so stupidly.
The love of Nature and all that did not happen until Romantism for before that Nature was entirely too inconvenient, dangerous and unprofitable. And that included the sea.
Only fools fear not the sea.
You don’t start out loving the sea and then build boats.
You learn to swim, use logs and so on for practical reasons, and then eventually you learn to build ships and when you no longer expect to die by drowning, then (and not before) you start loving the sea. In the bad old days every third sailor drowned.
Me, I side with Marx.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
An article on the current show at the
Met “Venice and the Islamic World
828-1797” suggests it was the Vatican
that embargoed trade with the Islamic
World. (see July issue of Washington
Report on Midddle East Affairs)
Click to flag this comment as abusive
SORRY I TELL TO ALL THE WESTERNERS , WE THE GREEKS OR BYZANTINES WHATEVER CONQURED IN 4TH CRUSADE AND THUS ALL BALKANS COULD NOT RESIST TO TURKS . YOU BETRAUY US OCCUPIED US SLAUGHTERED US , A CIVILIZATION CHRISTIANIC MORE CULTIVATED THAN YOURS WHICH WAS A STEP BEHIND ITS OWN RENAISANCE . fINALLY WE AND THE OTHER BALKANERS COULD NOT RESIST TO THE INFIDEL . bYZANTIUM HAD TO FIGHT 4 ENEMIES AT THE SAME TIME . YOU PUT THE TURKS TO EUROPE AND YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR 400 TO 700 YERS OCCUPATION AND THE LOSS OF MINOR ASIA AND OTHER CHRISTIANIC AREAS AND THE BACKWARDNESS OF THE BALKANS UNTIL NOW. YOU CONTINUE THIS STRATEGY SUPPORTING ALBANIANS BOSNIANS TURKS UNTIL NOW . BRAVO WEST BRAVO WEST BRAVO BARBARIANS
Click to flag this comment as abusive
i apologise about my bad english
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Methinks Theo has a point.
At least, Christianity in Iraq seems to be done for - which certainly was not an intended result when the decision to rid the world of Saddam Hussein was taken.
Anyway, I always find it intriguing how the fourth crusade and it’s consequences tend to be left out of any discussion about the success of islamic agression against christian Europe, just as the role of France’s most catholic monarch in the ottoman attack on Vienna has a tendency of not being mentioned in polite society.
In german, there is a wonderful word: “Feindbild” - image of the enemy. I come away from this very witty essay with the impression, that such an image is construed.
Let us be careful to fight the enemy - not an imaginary image which does not allow us to take proper aim, militarily speaking ...
Click to flag this comment as abusive
The thesis that the Muslim conquests cut Europe off from trade with North Africa, Southwest Asia, and Eastern Asia is one that was fully explored in “A Short History of the Arab Peoples” (1978) by John Bagot Blubb. This separation between Islam and Christendom was deemed in his book to be the proximate and principal cause for the economic decline of Europe. This is not by any means a new thesis. It must be one of those every 30 year loops like the return of pyramidology, the twist, and the hula-hoop.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
I’m not going to comment on the so-called Dark Ages of western Europe, but will observe that the supposed glories of Islam during this period, to the extent that they really existed, owed nothing to Islam.
Rather, Muslims had the fortune to conquer what had been the most highly civilized areas of the ancient world. All of Anatolia and the eastern Mediterranean littoral had previously been first Greek, then Roman, and were Christianized under the Romans. Egypt of course had its own great culture even before the Greeks. “Islamic civilization” lived off the cultural and intellectual capital of these ancient societies.
By contrast, most of western Europe had been the raw frontier of the Roman empire, or was never even conquered by Rome (e.g. most of Germany, Britain north of Hadrian’s wall, and all of Scandinavia). Under Catholic Christianity, the peoples of these disadvantaged places developed the architecture of Chartres and Notre-Dame, polyphonic music, representational painting and sculpture, the great wines of France and Germany, and more - NONE of which would or could have happened if Islam had succeeded in crossing the Pyrenees. All in all, not too bad a list of accomplishments for the descendants of a bunch of barbarians.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Let’s not forgot how the Europeans happened to find the Americas, they were looking for a Western route to the Far East so they could avoid traveling through pirate infested Muslim waters.
BTW, Muslim Somali pirates still infest the waters off East Africa. Plus ça change
Click to flag this comment as abusive
The West is a figment of wild imagination.
Where was the West when it sponsored and took part in the sack of Constatinople in 1204 which eventually weakened East Rome to such an extent when the Turks waltzed into Asia Minor?
Where was the West in 1918-1922 when the Greeks were attempting to regain Asia Minor?
Where was the West when it sponsored and participated in the invasion of Cyprus in 1974 by Turks?
Where was the West when it bombed Serbia and then sponsored and helped Albanian Moslem terrorists to establish a narco-state inside Europe?
The West does not exist. What exists are small minded opportunists that never respected culture and civilisation.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Post a Comment
By submitting this form, you give Taki's Magazine permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. Personal attacks, ethnic slurs, the riding of hobby horses and the beating of dead ones will be deleted as soon as they are detected by our small but alert staff. Repeat abusers of this policy will be barred from leaving comments. All comments reflect only the views of those posting them and not necessarily those of this website, its editors, or authors. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.
Commenting is not available in this section entry.