Your Email:

Subject:

Message:
Entry: Billionaire Kleptocrat-Towelheads Link: http://www.takimag.com/site/article/billionaire_kleptocrat_towelheads#125 Post contents: Tadzio— <i> Its main boosters are Jewish owned media. The purpose is to undermine the dominant culture of the West in order to facilitate the Jewish intention to divide and conquer.</i> Much of what you say has a gain or kernel of truth to it, though it’s exaggerated. Not so much divide and CONQUER as dilute and defang – at least that’s how they tend to look at it themselves. Jews don’t own all the MSM. But actually their influence and more or less veto power over anything that substantial numbers of networking Jews there get worked up about is nonetheless real. It works by their often being 25% or more of the journalists at elite and many other MSM outlets. Though rarely that sort of percentage in front of the camera. Someone widely marked among them as saying arguably to them “anti-Semitic” or “racist” things more than a time or two is in deep trouble for his job, and often simple and measured telling of the truth with facts behind it is regarded as those things, if anyone could “take it” the “wrong way” or if motives look to them to be suspect. Consider the purges at National Review of Sullivan and others a few years back. Usually there’s some allowance for minor crossings of their lines a time or two but then probation sets in and further offenses can and often do result in concerted campaigns against a journalist’s continued employment in much of the MSM. Political correctness, with many liberals and favored minorities ready to be allies, is the enforcer. The bar for saying taboo things has tended to be set lower and lower through the seventies through the nineties, with perhaps some recent leveling off or even a “slight” rollback. But nothing very refreshing, for the most part. Except on the Internet, thank god. Yeah many people now poke fun at political correctness, but the enforcement power of it’s great clubs, being branded as “racist” or “anti-Semitic” even for reasonable argued truth telling if it’s thought offense with a very delicate meter, remains. Sent at: 2008 07 20