Your Email:

Subject:

Message:
Entry: Un-Killing Whitey: The Achievement of Sam Francis Link: http://www.takimag.com/site/article/unkilling_whitey_the_achievement_of_sam_francis#1334 Post contents: Mr. Richert: I've never read anything overtly pro-abortion by Francis, but I've never read anything overtly against abortion either - astonishing for a so-called conservative thinker. What am I missing here? In the August 1996 essay he comes across as contemptuous of pro-lifers and indifferent to their aims. Certainly anyone who can promote the sterilization of non-whites in order to secure the racial hegemony of whites is not far from a pro-abortion position. Here's my best guess: If Sam Francis didn't like abortion, he liked non-whites even less, and therefore he ignored the contradiction and went about slaying the dragon he feared the most, the expanding non-white population in the United States. Racialists like Francis who are pro-life (if they actually exist) need to come to terms with something. If abortion were stopped tomorrow, the white proportion of our population would shrink even faster. In general non-whites have higher rates of abortion than whites. Non-whites also have higher birth rates. That means simply that whites are much better at contracepting: restricting abortion will therefore accelerate the growth of the non-white population. If you're a pro-life white racialist, the only way out of this conundrum is mass deportations of non-whites. Needless to say, that kind of solution isn't going to get you very far this side of Stormfrontland. I surmise that this probably explains why Francis never (to my knowledge) spoke out against abortion: he knew that its availability was working in favor of his racialist agenda. Sent at: 2008 07 09