Your Email:

Subject:

Message:
Entry: Rejecting Racialism Link: http://www.takimag.com/blogs/article/rejecting_racialism#15350 Post contents: @ David, "This neocon article would be more appropriate for First Things or Weekly Standard" Tell that to Taki's face and (although I don't speak for him) I'll bet he'll knock you down for the count. Except, Gentlemen don't bother brawling with non-gentlemen over matters of honour, so maybe Taki would just let you slink away - and when a Gentleman refuses to fight with you, that's a lot more degrading than being invited to an honest fight between decent men. At any rate, you're really crossing a line calling one of Taki's best writers a neocon. Zmirak doesn't necessarily represent what Taki believes in, but as long as Zmirak is one of Taki's champion writers, when you insult Zmirak's honour, you insult the host, Taki. (Gloss: Granted, a few months ago I insulted Jared Taylor who wrote an article for this site. That is why, as a matter of honour, I will no longer write any articles for this site. And as a matter of honour, I would present myself to take a blow from Taki if he thought it was necessary to defend his and his blog's honour after I insulted one of Taki's guest writers - an insult I continue to stand by. I'm just asking you, and others, to remember that whenever you insult the honour of any of Taki's writers, you're challenging Taki's honour. You can do that, but please be man enough to accept the consequences with integrity. Eh, that said, I think Taki would probably rather drink with me than fight - although I'll stand by my offer to take a punch from Taki after I insulted one of his writers, Jared Taylor. Followed by punches from the punch-bowl... :-) Sent at: 2008 11 21