Advertisement
Your Email:
Subject:
Message: Entry: Race, Nationalism, and Patriotism, Part II: Nationalism Link: http://www.takimag.com/blogs/article/race_nationalism_and_patriotism_part_ii_nationalism#15622 Post contents: Although I don't speak for John Lukacs, I'm 100 percent certain that he would agree with me when I say: This discussion about "race" is a distraction from the most dangerous, most immediate threat to America AND the entire planet Earth: the destruction of the land. The more you SO-CALLED "conservatives" mumble about (mostly) abstract bullshit like "race" and "nation", the more you continue to ignore the greatest dangers to America and to the entire world, the destruction of the land. Any so-called "patriotism" which does not make defense of the land and the landscape its first priority, is no "patriotism" at all. You so-called "conservatives" carry on talking about things like "race" while you continue to ignore the destruction of the land and of the planet. If this blog were AUTHENTICALLY "conservative", then its first concern would be about the poisonining and rape and irreparable devastation of the land and the landscape of America, and of Planet Earth. But no, you go on and on "debating" about abstract things like "DNA" which have NO bearing on whether any country, or the Earth, will survive for much longer. The World is on fire, literally. The World and all life (as far as we know, all life in the Universe) is poised on the edge of extinction, while you so-called "conservatives" chatter stupidly about superficial and abstract things like "race", while Planet Earth continues to die beneath your feet. Most of you so-called "conservatives" both "neocon" AND "paleocon" (never mind the White Nationalists among you who are the agents of Hell) - you chatter on and on about impractical things like "race", while the Earth, the World is burning to pieces beneath your feet - being burned to death by ALL races. Well, as I said, I don't speak for my good and loyal friend John Lukacs. But I am 100 percent certain that he would agree with what I have written here. Sent at: 2008 07 24