Your Email:

Subject:

Message:
Entry: How Clinton-Hating Dumbed Down the Right Link: http://www.takimag.com/blogs/article/how_clinton_hating_dumbed_down_the_right#16631 Post contents: Conservatism croaked (along with the nation) when the '65 immigration act was passed. It died when it accepted the concept of "creedal nation", a patent absurdity which really only exists to give the corrupt Establishment conservative cowards plausible deniability in the face of their collaboration-for-profit in the destruction of their own nation and people. A conservatism that won't conserve its own people simply has no reason to exist, and it is from this fact that the superficiality of the modern pseudo-con movement springs. Let James Burnham speak: "But modern liberalism [modern conservatism] does not offer ordinary men compelling motives for personal suffering, sacrifice, and death. There is no tragic dimension in its picture of the good life. Men become willing to endure, sacrifice, and die for God, family, king, honor, country, from a sense of absolute duty or an exalted vision of the meaning of history. It is such traditional ideals and the institutions slowly built around them that are in present fact the great bulwarks, spiritual as well as social, against the tidal advance of the world Communist enterprise. And it is precisely these ideals and institutions that liberalism has criticized, attacked, and in part overthrown as superstitious, archaic, reactionary, and irrational. In their place liberalism proposes a set of pale and bloodless abstractions--pale and bloodless for the very reason that they have no roots in the past, in deep feeling and in suffering. Except for mercenaries, saints, and neurotics, no one is willing to sacrifice and die for progressive education, Medicare, humanity in the abstract, the United Nations, and a 10 per cent rise in Social Security payments [Replace with tax cuts, foreign crusades, free trade, whatever establishment conservatives are pushing these days]." <I>(In fact, as Peter Brimelow has written, that domestic atrocity, conducted by a white racialist, helped destroy the otherwise decent chance of reforming immigration. It’s odd to remember that in 1995 there was a bipartisan consensus to pare back even legal immigration, as proposed by a black liberal Democrat appointed by President Clinton. Instead, we now congratulate ourselves for defeating an amnesty proposed by President Bush, and championed by our likely 2008 presidential nominee. How far we have come....)</i> That's not what Brimelow is saying at all. Whether McVeigh was a white racialist (that is a broad term) or not is irrelevant, he was motivated by anger over Waco, and his act had little or nothing to do with immigration or race, and had no effect on immigration policy. You're simply delusional if you believe we were ever on the cusp of immigration reform during the Jordan commission or at any other time. The commission's report was immediately sent to the circular file. Mass immigration is a concrete program of colonialism, originally designed to produce a political effect (the destruction of the "great bulwarks" Burnham writes of in order to clear the way for socialism) but now merely blind genocidal hatred of the West and whites. As Brimelow points out in the linked article not even 9/11 has caused the establishment (including the collaborator "conservative" wing of that establishment) to even mildly question immigration ("It’s almost as if our leaders don’t want to talk about immigration. Funny thing"). Didn't then, don't now. Sent at: 2009 01 08