Your Email:

Subject:

Message:
Entry: The Right's Science Problem Link: http://www.takimag.com/site/article/the_rights_science_problem#17366 Post contents: "'Inductivist' (one of the fake names used by the two Browns on this site, in attempt to make appear more common than they are).... Right, nobody on the Internet uses pseudonyms other than fakers, at least that's what some old man thinks. And please visit my website that goes by that pseudonym and shows that I took that name a year before Taki's Mag began. Your libel is duly noted. www.inductivist.blogspot.com ...still lives in the moronic fantasy world where there are only Reds and Browns, with the fallacy that if you’re not one, you’re the other. Sid is the one who calls people what they are not. I simply applied his technique to himself--it's not my kind of argument, it's his. Belief in race does not make one a Brown just as denying race does not put a person in one of Sid's tiresome political categories (that we must read about daily). "The fact is that every one of the many political positions rejects 'race' except the Browns. Indeed, race is the very definition of the Brown’s ideology." Nonsense, only ideologues like Gould of the last generation deny race. Race is not my definition of ideology--I simply don't think geographical genetic variation is imaginary--so how am I a Brown? From what I've read, Paul Gottfried accepts the reality fo race. Is he a Brown? You certainly must believe that Sam Francis was a Brown. Everyone's Brown who disagrees with Sid on the reality of race. Even Sid with his obsessive pigeon-holing can see that it is huge leap to say that all people who believe race is real are Browns. By that argument, most Americans and most of the world are made up of Browns. Sent at: 2008 09 06