Your Email:

Subject:

Message:
Entry: A Reply to Thomas DiLorenzo Link: http://www.takimag.com/sniperstower/article/a_reply_to_thomas_dilorenzo#24900 Post contents: As for this: <i>It has always been my intention to set the record straight. If that means that the neocons lose control of Lincoln’s legacy, then so be it (and why would that be a bad thing?!)</i> That's not the same as your original statement, which relegated the historical record to "a mere academic matter," putting the focus instead on the "control of the Lincoln legacy." I'm glad to see you backing off of that rhetorically, but your continued refusal even to consider that Evan McLaren and Dan Larison might be right about Bradford's intent (and your continued insistence that silence implies consent) indicates that this is no more than a rhetorical shift. Sent at: 2008 12 02