Your Email:

Subject:

Message:
Entry: A Response to Dan Larison Link: http://www.takimag.com/blogs/article/a_response_to_dan_larison#25342 Post contents: Prof. Gottfreid, I agree with your constructive comment on Mr. Larison’s discussion of Mr. Sichert’s article on Pope Benedict’s views of...oh yes, nationalism. Historical context helps, then as now. Claes Ryn’s work on the “intergalactic” Rights of Man aspect of American nationalism in America the Virtuous and The New Jacobins emphasizes the revolutionary, global, and imperial character of the current Project for a New American Century. While some nationalism can reflect pre-existing sentiment as well as class interests, nationalism can be deployed and manipulated as well in the interests of non-nationalistic projects. I think of the post-9/11 Freepers: many of these imbibe at least two flavors of energizing kool-aide: American nationalism and Christian Zionism although it would be hard to detect any material or ideological interest advanced by their intoxication with either. They might even prefer to call themselves patriots. How about an exoteric nationalism and an esoteric nationalism? I think Orwell was on the mark in 1984 with his distinction of outer and inner party. Like Richard Spencer in his recent discussion, “NeoCon Nation?” I think Robert Kagan’s strong claims for the neocons as national representatives warrant attention and critical examination. Sent at: 2008 08 29