Your Email:

Subject:

Message:
Entry: Rethinking 1948 Link: http://www.takimag.com/site/article/rethinking_1948#28255 Post contents: Ploni Almioni writes " RonL’s call for columns by “Israeli conservatives” is amusing. “Conservative” is not a category of Israeli political discourse, and imposing foreign political categories like that only confuses things. Ditto with the non-Israeli term “nationalist”. If by “nationalist” he means “Zionist”, of course van Creveld is a loyal one. If “nationalist” refers to the “national camp”, those who support sovereignty over the whole Land of Israel for ideological reasons, of course such views are easily found in neoconservative and mainstream conservative outlets. I wonder which particular Israeli “nationalist” writers RonL had in mind?" If you are an Israel, which your pseudonym suggests, you know better or are deliberately lying. You know damn well that the Likud or National Union would fall in this. Likud is a free-market party that respects religious and national heritage. NU is a religious nationalist party. Neoconservative magazine might run the occasion Security Zionist, but they will never run someone from National Union. Religious Zionists are not run, and those who think that Arabs and not Jews should be expelled are simply called racist. They never run people like Paul Eidelberg, who actually studied under Strauss. Rachel Strauss, Michael Freund, Steve Plaut, …………………… "In America, even paleoconservative publications are biased in favor of Israel, in that they support its continued existence. That’s almost surely a minority opinion in the world today." I take it back. You want Israel destroyed. That is not a position most people would support in the US since it would involve genocide. I also doubt that given the facts European would support it. GM, Is it possible that Morris, having been a leftist attacking Israel might have become their equivalent of a neocon? Sent at: 2008 11 20