Your Email:

Subject:

Message:
Entry: The "Good War" and the Terrible Peace Link: http://www.takimag.com/blogs/article/the_good_war_and_the_terrible_peace#29580 Post contents: Buchanan is not defending Hitler; he is explaining the context in which he arose. Why is it that examining the context in which Bolshevism, Communism, Leninism and Stalinism arose is perfectly acceptable intellectually and academically, but examining the context in which Hitler arose makes one a neo-Nazi? Is it because Buchanan is a Catholic? Then by that standard, Jewish academics and Neocon/Neolib polemicists who have examined the context in which Jewish Bolshevism, Communism, Leninism and Stalinism arose must be neo-Communists seeking to excuse the Communist holocaust against Christians, and perhaps spark a new one. Attacks on Buchanan bear the hallmark of left-liberal double standards with the agenda of keeping the “Right Wing” on the defensive and burying the Left-wing’s even more murderous history, which in fact established precedents that gave rise to Hitler and Nazism and its implementation. Left-liberals, Neocons and Neolibs seek to bury that history for a reason: because it is a cautionary tale of statist-authoritarianism under the guise of seeking justice, “liberalism,” and equality. They know the truth, which is that all their talk of spreading democracy is merely window dressing for a malignant statist power grab. Examining the context of Hitler and Nazism gets people asking questions about the narrative handed down by left-liberals for all these years, and left-liberals would rather keep the masses ignorant and compliant, which makes them easier to manipulate and turn into cannon fodder for statist Neocon/Neolib wars of agenda. Sent at: 2009 01 08