Your Email:

Subject:

Message:
Entry: Who's Infallible Here, Anyway? The Human Life Review Chooses Party Over Church Link: http://www.takimag.com/site/article/wars_and_rumors_of_war#5487 Post contents: Tony: Sid Cundiff, John Ball, and a few others on this site term anyone a "Brown" who disagrees with their views about race, judaism, and nationalism. The term obviously is meant to impute some sort of SA Brownshirt affinity to anyone who disagrees with them. I find this insinuation both insulting and preposterous. Disgracefully, the very same sort of "p.c" brow- beating that takes place in broader society is taking place here; thus, anyone who dares to critique Jewish influence in US foreign policy or America's slavish relationship to the state of Israel, for instance, can be and usually is termed, unjustly, an "antisemite." And the insinuation is that, darkly and maliciously, there may be some of us planning some sort of pogrom or some other awful act. If you read an earlier dscussion about the Church and the Jews you can see this debated in more detail. As well, to suggest that there are definable genetic differences in the races, Oh No! that draws forth howls from some who write on these pages that there are NO differences at all between the races (despite a mountain of verifiable research to the contrary). Indeed, once again the "p.c." mentality goes to work, and such people who maintain that there are indeed differences are called by some on this site "racists" or worse. The same kind of censorious and condescending virus that characterized (and still characterizes) the National Review, as it excommunicated first the old libertarians (Rothbard et al), then the poor Birchers, then the Southern agrarians (Davidson, Bradford, Clyde Wilson) and the old Right altogether, also seems to infect those who wish to excommunicate anyone who dissents from their views on Judaism, race, and nationalism, even on an avowedly "old right" site like this. Perhaps those topics are just "too hot" for some to handle---but that's the point. We SHOULD be able to discuss those topics without terming our potential opponents (to quote John Ball) "antisemite shits." Such an attitude--and language--is not only insulting to a great many of us who are NOT in any way "related" to SA Brownshirts, but, as it resorts to name-calling rather than serious thinking, is anti-intellectual and self-destructive. I do not share his definition or demarcations. I do believe that those terms are grossly overused and the definitions given here terribly simplified. Sent at: 2008 09 06