Americans in Canuckistan: Caute!
A brief word of caution to my American friends with heterodox views on politics, ethics, and religion. If you are planning to speak in any public forum in Canada in the near future, you may be under pressure to seek permission from the “Human Rights Commission” in the province that you intend to visit. An American Christian couple who planned to speak on the biblical view of homosexuality in a church in Alberta has just acquired a taste of the statist process which speakers may have to navigate in order to exercise their right to freedom of speech.
Of course, paleoconservatives and paleolibertarians who are dying to spread the gospel in Canuckistan but worried about their liberties can take consolation from the fact that the number of paleos up north could probably fit inside a school bus. The paucity of paleos may be getting worse, if more Canadians accept the view that freedom of speech is just an outdated, right-wing, American idea.
Is it any wonder that the novelist Tom Wolfe has claimed that fiction can no longer compete with reality for sheer fantasy and absurdity?
Comments
To the extent that Canadians believe it’s a good idea to adopt the tenets of a backward, hostile, alien approach to the exchange of ideas, they deserve the debasement and enslavement that surely befall all weak, stupid people.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
But on the bright side if one were seeking matyrdom for the Faith, Canada would be preferable to Saudi Arabia or some other Middle Eastern country.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
“But on the bright side if one were seeking matyrdom for the Faith, Canada would be preferable to Saudi Arabia or some other Middle Eastern country.”
on a more serious note, “seeking matyrdom” is as serious a sin as suicide, since they are both the same. You will notice most the famous saints were not executed because they ran straight for the gallows in glee.
Reminds me of the story where 2 roman soldiers on patrol down a city street saw a christian man running around screaming “i am a christian! kill me kill me!” and one soldier said to another “if the man wants death so bad, there is a cliff right over there!”
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Good thing to know that whenever I’m feeling despondent about the state of things in the U.S., I just need to look northward to realize they could always be a lot worse…
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Canada doesn’t exist just to make American conservatives feel better - Canada’s also good for maple syrup, hockey, and a comedian or two.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
It seems to me that its a good idea to keep church and state seperate. Yet here in America we have church wanting to get involved in state.
Orwell here we come!!
Click to flag this comment as abusive
We here in Canada don’t need outdated notions of free speech an individual freedoms like you have in the US. We have replaced all that with group rights. Your rights devolve from the ethnic-religious-cultural group to which you belong. All this is bound together by the unwritten rules of political correctness enforced by our Human Rights Commissions. Welcome to the New World Order
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Canada may not be as right wing as the United States, but historically it has been a more conservative and cautious nation. The Crown is an obvious example, but I’m thinking even recently such as the country’s approach to the housing market or its steady management of public finances. For years now, you run the risk of political suicide if you run a budgetary deficit. Things will eventually come around on free speech too and the soft totalitarianism of the ‘Human Rights’ commissions will one day be reigned in. This will happen slowly, as things always do in Canada, but it will happen. There are rumblings of discontent now, where none existed a year ago. All that is required now is a little raising of hell and patience. And if that doesn’t work, well, you can always bomb us.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
I’m to assume there are absolutely no limits on free speech in the US.
What does SCOTUS do with their time..
Considering their freedom of religious belief is being expressed in such a context (out of the realm of jurisdiction of Alberta Human Rights Commission) I don’t believe this couple should have cause to worry. Discrimination is actually still allowed in admittedly limited applications.
So ironically, if they feel their religious expression is being infringed on, they should file a complaint with the Alberta Human Rights Commission.
But yeah, it sucks that anyone can feel free to lodge a complaint, and lose.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
http://bluebook.state.or.us/cultural/history/history11.htm
The missionaries of the past received even more hostile treatment. (The Oregon Territory was jointly owned by the U.S. and Canada prior to the treaty that set the current boundaries.)
Click to flag this comment as abusive
I think the honour goes to the artist and writer,
Wyndham Lewis, who posited the points attributed
to Tom Wolfe in 1928, in ‘Satire & Fiction.”
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Post a Comment
By submitting this form, you give Taki's Magazine permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. Personal attacks, ethnic slurs, the riding of hobby horses and the beating of dead ones will be deleted as soon as they are detected by our small but alert staff. Repeat abusers of this policy will be barred from leaving comments. All comments reflect only the views of those posting them and not necessarily those of this website, its editors, or authors. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.
Commenting is not available in this section entry.