Diagnosing Obamania
As I find myself sliding into an advanced stage of Obamania, I think I might be well suited to write a serious pathological study of this terrible disease, which is striking down so many of our best conservative and libertarian thinkers in their prime. It’s also very important that we start looking into Obamania now, for even if a cure might be out of reach, the disease seems to be having an appreciable effect on the current presidential race. According to experts in these matters,
Obama owes his first-place standing to the millions of independents and Republicans who voted for him in states that allowed them to participate in the Democratic nominating contest, the News found.
Clinton would top Obama by more than 360,000 votes if only Democrats were counted, and the delegate race--which Obama leads by 135--would likely be tighter.
It’s a pandemic! And worse still, Obamanaia has multiple strains. The disease takes effect in different patients for different reasons. Indeed, I’m tempted to say: Tell me about your Obamania, conservative or libertarian thinker, I’ll tell you who you are.
What follows is a brief catalogue of the varieties of Obamania and some of their symptoms.
Terminal Obamania: Many of these sufferers call themselves “conservative” for no apparent reason political, social, or economic, and simply became Republicans because it seemed like the really patriotic thing to do. For them, Obamania lay in a dormant stage, even while some were employed by President Bush as his media advisor or special aide. Symptoms include feeling a “thrill go up your leg” while listening to Obama speak and to use with all earnestness phrases like “Make History,” “Hope,” “the American Dream,” and “what we are as a nation,” which all seem to be interchangeable and to signify not much of anything. Sometimes this strain even affects Romney propagandists, who begin to lose powers of self-control and feel “tempted”—“he almost had me last night[!]”
Barrack Bargainers Disease: The strain afflicts people who think that electing a candidate with a high Melanin count would relieve them of the need to confront tricky issues that bother them to no end but which they’d prefer not to talk about in polite company, not to mention oppose vigorously on principle. Ergo, they make arguments like, “If Obama really wanted to transcend race, he’d end affirmative action.” There’s also a vague hope that if we elect Obama, Al, Jesse, and friends will stop calling America racist . Clearly, these people are delusional.
More sophisticated forms of this strain make patients believe that if we’d only elect this half-Kenyan Harvard-educated senator, all issues of class, race, and resentment would magically vanish—poof!:
Black and minority America would be fully integrated into the nation as the British working class was fully integrated into the British political nation by George V. Americans would feel better about themselves and the world would feel very differently about America.
White Pride Delirium For these patients, Obamania creates a spectre in their minds that electing Obama would be the thing that finally turns American whites into ethno-nationalists (as riots and miscarriages of celebrity justice didn’t quite do the trick). Some have dreams that Obama will appoint Rev. Wright as secretary of the interior, Michele to the Department of Labor, and Farrakahn at State.
Those afflicted with this strain suffer blindness to the fact that Obama is pretty skillful at dumping black nationalists once they’re no longer useful; and while he probably won’t appoint any racist reverend to high office, he’s very likely to install some really horrible white people like Samantha Power and Zbigniew Brzezinski.
Realpolitikitis: This strain only affects the most intelligent commentators, who are willing to put up with some liberal domestic programs for the prospect of ending the war in Iraq. (And in all honesty, could Obama’s liberalism really be that much worse than Bush’s!?! If anything, it’s likely to be marginally better.)
Unfortunately these patients have been focusing so intently on Iraq that they’ve developed myopia, failing to see that while Obama might be the best positioned to remove troops from Iraq, he’s likely to redeploy them somewhere more politically correct.
Leninitis of the Right Brain : The symptoms of this strain are dramatically different than those of Terminal Obamania. Conservatives who are susceptible almost always have a predisposition towards mean-spiritedness and curmudgeonliness. They look on with wicked glee at the election of Obama as the American public getting the government it deserves and the GOP suffering embarrassing, catastrophic defeat. Some have hope that this strain might inoculate the Republican Party from the far worse disease of Bilingual Open-borderitis, which has been drifting over from Arizona.
* * *
What strain do I suffer form? I think I have a bad case of Realpolitikitis, but with some warning signs of Leninitis of the Right Brain. Can I be helped?




Comments
White pride delirium with a slight touch of realpolitikitis. Michelle and the good Rev. don’t have to be appointed to the cabinet, all they need to do is give interviews and speeches for four years. How bout the effect of having three affirmative action hires in every office in America? I’ve already had two in college, both French teachers from Africa and they were awful. And with four years of affirmative action on steroids and expansion of the programs that caused the growth of black anti-social behavior in the first place even the most unreflective liberal may be forced to take the James Watson hypothesis seriously (provided these programs continue to fail miserably, as those who know about the race/IQ connection think they inevitably will).
More importantly, every criticism of the president, every thing that happens in this country will have people talking about race. James Watson says something else undiplomatic? Barack, Michelle, and Jerimiah will have to comment. Another Duke rape case, series of riots or OJ trial? The same. Whites will be forced to take sides on issues they previously had been comfortably able to ignore. When I bring up the fact to educated whites that every race is allowed an identity except whites I can see that they understand the logic but have been conditioned to get sweaty and change the subject (interestingly, when I bring this up to less educated whites I get the same agreement with none of the guilt). A never ending “conversation about race” I hope will sensitize people to these kinds of questions.
And finally, people are generally stupid and convinced by simple and symbolic rather than complex arguments and when hearing blacks are opressed the reply “You’ve got a black president for crissake!” will probably go a long way.
So yes, this white nationalist has Obamamania! You should probably add something about hatred of John McCain. I’d rather have a black nationalist granting amnesty to 20 million illegals than a “conservative” white war hero. Maybe file that under “realpolitikitis”.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
“Can I be helped?”
The doctor is in, and he says take one Chuck Baldwin and call me in the morning.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
I agree with Dr. Phillips’ medical opinion.
For an advanced case of Obamamania, a sure fire cure is moving to a small town, buying a gun, and joining a local church. It works every time. Warning: bitterness may be a possible side effect.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
An excellent article. I think you have covered all the possible strains of Obamania. Vote third party so as not to support the charade election between the Republocrats. We have to send the message that will make the remnants of the Republican Party think, “gee I wonder if it would be possible to get some of those people who voted third party to vote Republican?”
Click to flag this comment as abusive
I am certainly afflicted with Realpolitikitis, not because I want Republicans to win in the long term, but because of the bitter glee I get in seeing the United States reap what it has sown. A radical, black president could break the framework of ‘mainstream’ party politics completely, creating more parties and firmer positions without compromise to serve consensus, the principle that trumps all others. I foresee, as Paul Gottfried said, ‘the icebreaker for the counter-revolution.’ Barack Obama is Salvador Allende; he is Buonaparte; he is the Spanish Second Republic. Of course, this is only what he could potentially be. I am confident that his régime will be terrible enough to merit his being overthrown, but I do not underestimate the powers of the media to advance and direct their agenda despite reason indicating that the opposite of what they say is true. We will have to wait and see. It depends on their vigilance. The slightest slack, the tiniest miscalculation, could doom the powers that be. For deliverance from the liberals and other anti-Christs, we have now only to work and pray the Rosary.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Here’s a cure for Leninitis: remind yourself that if Obama is elected and disaster predictably ensues, Americans are not going to say, “God, we should have elected Ron Paul!” They’re going to say, “God, we should have elected John McCain!”
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Sorry, did I say Realpolitikitis ? By no means ! I have Leninitis, and a rather bad case of it.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
While I realise this tabloidalitis skill may have been, at some point, the driving force behind the Newt revolution it hardly meshes with reality [and fact]. The number one industry supporting the Obama presidential bid, by the start of February,—the crucial time in primary season—according to the widely respected, nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics, was “lawyers/law firms” (most on Wall Street’s payroll), giving a total of $11,246,596.
I think your a good writer Richard, but tend to not see the full spectrum.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Taki, love ya man, I see a new paradigm coming and I see you as a new hope for all mankind.
Click to flag this comment as abusive
Post a Comment
By submitting this form, you give Taki's Magazine permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. Personal attacks, ethnic slurs, the riding of hobby horses and the beating of dead ones will be deleted as soon as they are detected by our small but alert staff. Repeat abusers of this policy will be barred from leaving comments. All comments reflect only the views of those posting them and not necessarily those of this website, its editors, or authors. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.
Commenting is not available in this section entry.