Source: Bigstock

After the deadly Yom Kippur terror attack on a synagogue in the English city of Manchester, it was easy to feel sorry for the innocent members of the oppressed minority group being directly targeted: Muslims.

The Center for Media Monitoring (CfMM), a crybully censorship-happy offshoot of the Muslim Council of Britain, strongly objected to the next morning’s front page of U.K. tabloid The Daily Mail, whose headline irresponsibly described the perpetrator like so: “HE WAS AN ISLAMIC TERRORIST.”

Not according to the CfMM. Although the man was a Muslim called Jihad al-Shamie, which quite literally means “I am a jihadist from Syria,” who had called the police beforehand to helpfully inform them he was performing his deed in the name of the Islamic State, still the CfMM concluded that “The action of this terrorist is anti-Islamic!”

His Line on the Arson
Didn’t the CfMM mean “antisemitic” here? No, the stabbing was primarily an Islamophobic act, as the largest number of victims would not be the piffling, limited number of Jews present there at the Manchester synagogue that day getting sliced up by the knifeman, but the 4 million completely innocent Muslims residing across the rest of Great Britain, who would end up being collectively blamed for the crime in a wholly unwarranted fashion.

One such guiltless man was Humza Yousaf, the (Pakistani-origin) former First Minister of Scotland, who also said the assault had “nothing to do with Islam,” before pointing out in a video that, two days after news of the Manchester attack broke, someone had gone out and torched a mosque in the ironically named town of Peacehaven, Yousaf’s implication being it was an anti-Muslim revenge attack doubtless perpetrated by a knuckle-dragging Aryan nationalist skinhead.

Unfortunately for Humza, the alleged arsonist subsequently arrested for the incident turned out to be called Arif Ali Rafiq, and he wasn’t a white convert.

An even wilder attempt to paint Muslims as the true victims of Manchester came from Birmingham barrister Sham Uddin, who is also an “accredited mediator, writer and philosopher,” not to mention a former independent candidate for Parliament. Uddin went online to post dubious conspiracy theories implying the stabber was actually an undercover Jewish agent, as “the Israeli government have sleeper cells in the USA and UK and they activate them at their will.”

The next stage of the plan to wrongly turn white British bigots against the Religion of Peace was to have a Jew ostentatiously dressed as a sheikh or something assassinate King Charles by swooping down on him with his magic carpet and dropping a concrete-filled camel onto his head while ululating, thereby causing such public outrage that a nationwide race war between whites and Muslims was immediately triggered.

Presumably Tel Aviv’s strategy behind this looming false-flag Zionist regicide was to so outrage Britain’s ordinary, patriotic, royalty-loving whites that they would boot out all the imported Muslims by sheer force of arms, no matter what their traitorous politicians said, thereby ensuring the country’s Jews could safely go about their synagogues without being stabbed to death by madmen with names like Jihad once more, like they could in the past. But if the Israelis really wanted to save the necks of ordinary British Jews, maybe the best persons to have lined up for elimination by bogus Mossad jihadis would actually be Britain’s own supposed Jewish “leaders,” not King Charles?

Tommy Rot
In the wake of the stabbings, some sensible-sounding Jewish representatives made the rationally correct-sounding noises. Gideon Falter, head of the U.K.’s Campaign Against Antisemitism, declared that “Today, the blood of British Jews is on the hands of virtue-signalling politicians who have poured fuel on the fire of extremism with their posturing and appeasement” of the millions of unassimilable aliens they had stupidly let into the country for no good reason.

Blood, said Gideon, was also dripping from the hands of the “police chiefs who have failed to tackle the [pro-Muslim] mobs on our streets, the universities and schools that have tolerated incitement, the BBC whose bias and moral collapse has essentially turned them into spokespeople for Hamas…and regulators like the Charity Commission that has failed abjectly to address dangerous rhetoric at mosques.”

But not all British Jews agree. In the wake of the stabbings, the prominent white British anti-Islam campaigner Tommy Robinson was invited to visit Israel by a hard-line member of Benjamin Netanyahu’s cabinet, something that seemed to offend and appall certain politically correct official U.K. Jewish organizations more than the stabbings themselves did. In a statement of coordinated condemnation, the Board of Deputies of British Jews and the Jewish Leadership Council jointly described Robinson as “a thug” who represented the “very worst of Britain.” Even worse than Jihad al-Shamie?

Actually, despite his above words, even Gideon Falter has sniffily disowned Tommy Robinson himself in the past. What’s their problem with Tommy? He habitually defends Jews, warns that Muslims are planning to kill and oppress them, and is a Zionist supporter of Israel. Ah, but he also believes in the Great Replacement and doesn’t like “globalists,” a word some people use as a euphemism for Jews, but that he personally says he doesn’t. Robinson also once wrote an article saying Jews were overrepresented in government, media, business, and Hollywood, which he explained by virtue of their higher-than-average IQs, and has critiqued America’s leading supposed pro-Jewish advocacy group the ADL as a “racially charged, far-left, anti-white, self-serving organisation,” which it is.

So on the one hand, Jihad al-Shamie likes to stab Jews for breakfast. On the other hand, Tommy Robinson thinks Jews have big brains, he just doesn’t want to watch their shitty right-on Hollywood movies full of black female James Bonds and dwarf disabled Robin Hoods who rob from the cis and give to the trans. Yet somehow, say the Official Jews, people like him are the greater threat to British Jewry.

Another key factor may be that Tommy is also working-class, has a prison record, and probably doesn’t read The Guardian or The Times, which the Official Jews consider a bit off form, a bit de trop. Having often been here for generations, Establishment Jews in Britain are just that—part of the Establishment, which is overwhelmingly left-leaning and tastefully upper-middle-class. Being well integrated, such Jews are naturally well represented in the country’s political, legal, administrative, and media sectors, meaning the rise of “populist” anti-immigration figures like Robinson represents a potential threat to their professional well-being.

So, rather than admitting this disgraceful little white-trash Union Jack-loving oik is correct, they prefer to condemn him and his supposedly “far-right” kind as being the true worst threat to Jews in this country, not the Muslims who are actually trying to kill them. By this, they actually mean Tommy is the worst threat to their own cushy jobs and deliberately unexamined liberal, immigration-worshipping opinions, not their actual lives; no doubt the well-off synagogues they go to personally have all the best security.

Blind Ali
Thankfully, there are at least some British-based Muslims out there with agreeably socially acceptable, Establishment-friendly, left-wing views who have expressed deep and sincere sympathy for the country’s Jews following the Manchester attack. Mothin Ali, Deputy Leader of the U.K. Green Party, for example, called the incident “an absolute tragedy.”

A long-term scourge of divisive rhetoric, Mr. Ali knows all about the dangers of spouting racial hatred. Only last month, he reported a political rival to the police for making “racist dog whistles” during a speech about Pakistani grooming gangs, while a recent family vacation he was enjoying at the English seaside was rudely interrupted by uncouth white neo-Nazis calling the Alis “Paki bastards” (they’re actually Bangladeshis, all born inside wedlock) and telling them to “get out of our country.”

All the Alis were doing on the beach was enjoying “real wholesome family fun” by “looking for some interesting rocks” to stone an adulteress with; the next thing they knew they were being pelted themselves, with beer bottles. Eventually, the bottle flingers “even pulled their trousers down” at his children. I’d observe that several members of the Pakistani rape gangs pulled their trousers down before other people’s children too, on occasion, but if I did I fear Mothin might have me arrested.

Unlike Tommy Robinson, Mothin Ali is no dangerous, Cross of St. George-waving English nationalist whose company would be automatically shunned by all sensible British Official Jews, though. Instead, as a committed left-wing anti-racist, Ali is deeply alarmed by the current spate of Englishmen like Tommy Robinson hoisting the English flag all over England, as:

“What it’s saying is, there’s some people who will put the flag up and they’re the ones who belong—and everyone else who doesn’t somehow doesn’t belong. That narrative has to change.”

Indeed it does: That evil flag has to go right now! And be replaced directly with another. When first elected as a Green Party councillor in the fantastically multiracial city of Leeds, Ali dedicated his win first and foremost to “the people of Gaza” by shouting “Allahu Akbar!” in front of a large Palestinian flag. He has also ostensibly backed Hamas’ October 7 attacks by defending online the right of “indigenous people to fight back” against “settler colonialism.” Not when it’s white people fighting back against brown people doing it to them by raising their own flag in their own country, though, like Tommy does.

Run, Rabbi
So committed does Ali claim to be toward fostering tolerant intercommunity harmony that he has lobbied Leeds City Council to declare itself the U.K.’s “first city of belonging, a place where all citizens can feel like they are part of a place where they are valued.” All citizens except Rabbi Zecharia Deutsch, a student chaplain at Leeds University, who was called up to serve in the IDF as a reservist following Hamas’ October 7 attacks against Israel.

Once Deutsch returned from his national service, Ali posted a video calling him a “creep” and saying, “Leeds University should be protecting its students against this kind of animal…. [If] he’s willing to kill people over there, how do you know he’s not going to kill your students over here?” Pretty soon, Deutsch then started getting calls from various other well-integrated local Muslims threatening his family with murder and rape, forcing them into hiding, something for which the Rabbi blamed Ali.

For his own part, the self-styled “plain-speaking Yorkshireman” Ali later asked for Deutsch to be investigated by the police himself, along with anyone else “who participates in a genocide.” Nonetheless, Mothin later added, “we shouldn’t conflate what’s happening in Israel to British Jews here—I think that is irresponsible.” Indeed so. It might help lead to some of them getting stabbed in a synagogue or something.

Yet, interviewed about his Deputy Leader’s earlier words and actions immediately following the Manchester attack, the nice, kind, loving, left-wing, non-nationalist, anti-fascist, Green Party leader Zack Polanski refused point-blank to condemn him. “I take anti-Semitism really seriously,” Zack said, before adding that “I also recognize in the same breath that Islamophobia is on the rise.” I wonder why that might be?

Zack Polanski, it may surprise you to learn, is himself a Jew.

From Manchester.