Finally, there is sex. As one Marine Corps veteran 
explains, “€œMale bonding is what takes the hill. And male bonding just doesn’t happen with women around.”€
A soldier recently put it this way on a Web page:

The Infantry squad is, hands friggen’ down, the backbone of any armed conflict. They can do anything, anywhere, anytime”€”because the lives of their buddies depend on it. The bond between men in an Infantry squad is like no other….The addition of women would utterly turn the squad’s level of cohesion and unity upside-down faster than anything. The female would become the center of attention, and the butt-end of every joke. Morale would be a crushing weight dragging the squad down into the dirt.

It destroys what the Army calls “€œgroup cohesion”€ if a man has been jilted by the squad tart and then has to listen to her squealing all night in someone else’s foxhole.

The military hands out condoms as if they were candy, but accidents happen. In the 1990s, 
Navy Captain Martha Whitehead testified before a military commission that women were three times more likely to be “€œnon-deployable”€ than men, and that 47 percent of the time it was because they were pregnant.

In 2009, so many pregnant lady soldiers were being evacuated from Iraq that Major General Anthony Cucolo ordered a court martial and possible jail time for any woman in his command who got pregnant”€”and for the man responsible. “€œI’ve got a mission to do.”€ he said. “€œI’m given a finite number of soldiers with which to do it and I need every one of them.”€

There are other problems. From 2006 to 2011, the rate of violent sex crimes in the military shot up 64 percent, with an estimated 19,000 sexual assaults in 2010 alone. Women are 14 percent of Army personnel but are 95 percent of sex-crime victims.  (The Army warns there will be more cases of men raping men now that homosexuals don”€™t have to worry about being kicked out, but that is a different problem.)
General Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, says he thinks women in combat will help solve the problem of sexual harassment. He pushed Leon Panetta very hard to lift the ban. “€œI have to believe,”€ he explains, “€œthat the more we can treat people equally, the more likely they are to treat each other equally.”€ This is certifiably insane.
 
A man in fighting trim runs on testosterone. That is what makes him an effective killer; it also makes him think about sex every minute of the day. Putting women on the battlefield is like shoving the cheerleaders into the locker room with the team after a football game and locking the doors.
 
Combat troops are young men who kill people for a living. In the all-volunteer Army they are there because they like killing people. The military throws young women at them and is shocked”€”shocked”€”to discover that the men don”€™t always behave like gentlemen. So the Navy has 
mandatory anti-sex-assault training for every sailor, and the Army has SHARP (Sexual Harassment/Assault Response & Prevention). They don”€™t change their idiotic policies; they try to change men.
When Leon Panetta made his announcement, President Obama was delighted:

Today, every American can be proud that our military will grow even stronger with our mothers, wives, sisters and daughters playing a greater role in protecting this country we love.

 
He got it exactly backward. Men go to war precisely so that their mothers, wives, sisters, and daughters don”€™t have to go. War is ultimately about national survival. Half the men could die in combat but if women survive, the men who are left can keep the nation going. A society that sends child-bearers into combat has gone mad.

Secretary of the Army Togo West once said that keeping women out of combat slows their promotions and prevents them “€œfrom reaching their full potential.”€ The only men who talk like that wear ribbons instead of helmets. A soldier’s job is to find the enemy and kill him”€”yes, him“€”not to be part of a giant experiment in egalitarian fantasy. Only degenerate countries put women in combat.
 
Of course, it will work for a while”€”with higher casualties, grinding inefficiencies, and endless lies and cover-ups. But when the century draws to a close and the Chinese write the history of what used to be the United States, they will note that it was a sure sign the place was doomed when the American soldier became a social worker with a rifle instead of a professional killer. 



Columnists

Sign Up to Receive Our Latest Updates!

SIGN UP

Daily updates with TM’s latest