Modern Weapons

The Hunt for a Good Bad Guy

August 14, 2015

Share

There is a severe rape drought going on in the West; not the violent sexual assault as is broadly defined by the law but a particular kind of rape. We want wealthy white males with blond hair high-fiving each other as they torture some poor girl who was just trying to get an education. The Middle East is resplendent with these scenarios, but the guy usually has a funny hat on instead of Richie Rich hair. Here in America prison tops the rape charts, but that’s men on men, and men are gross. Firmly planted behind the prison-rape stats we have black-on-white rape clocking in at tens of thousands a year (unfortunately, the white-on-black rape stats are negligible). That sounds racist. Women were getting gang-raped en masse at spring break this year, but that was mostly blacks too so no thanks.

There is a lot of currency behind the Duke lacrosse rapist ideal. Through Title IX, the government offers financial rewards to schools for digging up sexual offenders in varsity jackets. Rapists give feminists something to fight for in a culture where women have little to complain about. This means when a woman lies about frat boys, or carries a mattress around, or simply says someone resembles a rapist, the ax falls hard. Most recently we had Jim Norton suggesting someone “€œforcibly cums“€ in Marco Rubio’s ass because Marco is against post-rape abortions. This joke was clearly anti-rape, but slim pickings mean Norton is a rapist.

“€œRoosh’s proposal was about as serious as one of Jonathan Swift’s, but the message is correct.”€

Which brings me to this week’s rape de semaine. Daryush Valizadeh is a “€œpickup artist”€ (a.k.a. PUA) who spares us his ridiculous foreign name by using the moniker Roosh V. He tours the world giving small groups of men simple tips such as: Get in shape, be interesting, start the conversation simple, etc. As far as I”€™m concerned he’s a hippie love guru trying to rebuild the male-female relationship after decades of sabotage. We live in a stifled environment where groups of men have entirely given up on women and replaced them with porn. They call it a “€œsexodus“€ and groups such as MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) are “€œRefusing to bow, serve and kneel for the opportunity to be treated like a disposable utility.”€ This isn”€™t good for the human race. As Joe Strummer used to say, “€œWithout people, you”€™re nothing.”€

Encouraging traditional gender roles is a dangerous trend for the rape alarmists. So when Roosh announced he was doing talks in Toronto and Montreal this week, the feminazis committed to shut it down. They cited an article he wrote back in February called “€œHow to Stop Rape“€ wherein he said we should “€œmake rape legal if done on private property.”€ His point being women would be a lot less heedless about inviting men over and false accusations would also end if this amendment came to pass. His proposal was about as serious as one of Jonathan Swift’s, but the message is correct. Women have such hubris these days that they are endangering themselves. Getting wasted in public is reckless for a woman no matter how much we “€œteach men not to rape.”€ Passing out on a crowded beach may not be asking for it, but it’s pretty close. This is what an intellectual discussion does. It posits an outlandish hypothesis that provokes you into confronting a dark truth. He could have said, “€œIf we forbade black men from ever being around white women, rape cases would plummet.”€ This is an impossible scenario no sane person would want to implement, but it’s also a great way to showcase the shocking statistics behind interracial rape.

Just to be triple sure, I had Roosh on my show and asked him point-blank about Fernando Sandel. After being invited to various women’s homes here in New York, Sandel would let his buddies Joey Cruz and Isaiah Rivera in so they could all gang-rape his date. This is private property and would be legal under Roosh’s scenario. He responded, “€œIf I was being serious with my thought experiment, maybe it would. If people genuinely think that I was advocating for violence against anyone, their IQ has to be under 80.”€ IQ, huh? Again, sounds racist.

Subscribe to Taki’s Magazine for an ad-free experience and help us stand against political correctness.