January 22, 2024
January is a time for new starts: So how about starting a new life in a new country? Before Christmas, I wrote about how Charles de Gaulle’s grandson Pierre was applying for Russian citizenship to escape the woke, Islamist hellhole large portions of his ancestral homeland had now become. But will M. de Gaulle only have been jumping from la poêle into le feu?
I previously glossed Russia as “a basically all-white country,” but that is merely the inaccurate impression most Western outsiders like de Gaulle have. Sure, there are hardly any licorice-black Muslims from Mali, as in France, but there are plenty of Caramac-colored Central Asian Muslims imported from deepest Borat country to serve as cheap labor, due to white Russians’ steadily declining birth rate: over 10 million, in fact. And, much as in la Poubelle France, they are increasingly becoming radical and criminal in equal measure. Actual Russians are consequently forming their own racial self-defense units in response, causing fights in city streets. Some fear the Islamists are arming themselves for full-blown revolution.
Unlike in the West, Russia’s government refuses to pander to these fifth columnists, promoting a nationalist, integrationist narrative, and hoping that good old-fashioned bigotry will keep a lid on things: In Russia, the white Nazis sometimes behead the brownish Muslim ones, which certainly makes a nice change from the pattern in France. Still, Pierre de Gaulle may not have made the absolute best choice of new home to escape Islam.
The problem is: Where is left to actually flee to? Occidental lands are all as bad as each other these days, mass-immigration-wise. I am reminded of a scene in Michel Houellebecq’s 2015 novel Submission, about an Islamist takeover of France, where a young Jewish student announces she is leaving Paris for Israel, escaping the growing anti-Semitism all around her. However, her boyfriend, being a white, post-Christian Frenchman, laments that “There’s no Israel for me.”
Hungary for Salvation
Except…maybe there now is. An international conservative conference was held in London recently, Alliance for Responsible Citizenship—or ARC, an acronym seemingly chosen for its resemblance to ARK, as in the boat built by Noah. But where was this Ark of civilizational sanctuary desperately being constructed to escape the Salafist flood? Certainly not in Londonistan itself.
According to some depressed white attendees, “Hungary is our Israel”—or our Ark, as it were. Many disappointed conservatives are now moving Danube-wards in search of greener pastures. Why Hungary? Because it is led by Viktor Orbán, an alleged “far-right fascist” or “prejudiced bigot,” if you listen to most corrupt Western media.
Why is he a fascist? Because he rejects mass immigration, refuses to bend to the E.U. and let millions of Muslims in, publicly disparages George Soros, passes laws against the queer indoctrination of kids, maintains freedom of speech, and proudly seeks to keep his country white and Christian. In other words, he’s normal.
Naturally, this can’t be allowed, so Uncle Sam has been trying to undermine Orbán of late, apparently illegally funding the more liberal Hungarian opposition and allied pro-immigration and pro-LGBTQ NGOs undercover, considering Hungary a “Key Battleground State” in the war for the West’s soul. Is it really wise to deliberately antagonize a NATO ally in this way? Only if you want to morally colonize it, remaking the entire place in your own sick image, like a willfully condom-less AIDS patient.
Her Own Worst Enemy
Amongst certain receptively-minded Hungarians, such mind-warping propaganda has successfully done its work. A classic example once appeared in leftist U.K. newspaper The Guardian, from journalist Kata Karáth. Headlined “Viktor Orban’s bigoted vision leaves me ashamed to be Hungarian,” the article’s lead-in bewailed how “The Prime Minister wants us all to be white, heterosexual and Christian. Yet our past is one of multiculturalism and migration.” Only in the sense that Muslim armies forcibly colonized the place during the days of the Ottoman Empire.
Karáth hated Orbán’s perfectly sensible speeches to the effect that “We do not want to be a diverse country, we want to be [the same as] how we [were] 1,100 years ago,” sentiments the majority of native voters agreed with. But not Karáth:
At the moment, I don’t much like being Hungarian. In recent years I’ve started feeling that my nationality resembles a nasty skin disease that I want to scrub off. When I’m abroad, I hide my accent and I call myself a “world citizen.” I’ve vowed never to have a Hungarian boyfriend, or even to settle down in my own country…. [My fellow leftist chum] Orsolya likes to say she only comes from Hungary but isn’t Hungarian, because the word has been hijacked.
As a result, self-hating Karáth now lives in Ecuador. Ashamed of her own people, past, heritage, and culture, she has become pure deracinated globalist UHM, or Undifferentiated Human Matter, as Renaud Camus would put it. Yet, ironically, aren’t her supposedly “tolerant” words actually quite bigoted, only from a left-wing, rather than a right-wing, perspective? She boasts she has “vowed never to have a Hungarian boyfriend,” for example. Just imagine if an Orbán voter wrote an article bragging she had “vowed never to shag an African.”
Once Orbánistas bow down before the globalists like Biden, says Karáth, “break out of [their] siege mentality” and “accept differences” (re: meekly agree to be replaced by blacks and Muslims), then, finally, she says, “We can be proud again of being Hungarian.” Yet Karáth’s deluded, upside-down definition of “being Hungarian” here is to allow actual Hungarians to be substituted with non-Hungarians en masse.
There used to be a dismissive saying about non-white immigrants in the U.K.: “Just because a dog is born in a stable, it doesn’t mean it’s a horse.” Now, deracinated fungible UHM units like Kata Karáth have reversed this old gibe: “Just because a horse is born in a stable, it doesn’t mean it’s a horse.”
Silence Is Violence
Leftist, ruling-caste chauvinists like Karáth like to catastrophize that the slightest element of Orbán-style nationalism or Christian traditionalism immediately makes someone into a deranged Nazi, ready to go around gunning down and beheading towelheads at the drop of a hat, as in modern Russia. But might left-wing bigotry like hers also sometimes lead to similar outcomes?
You’ll remember Audrey Hale, the disturbed female-to-male tranny who, identifying as a rabid dog rather than a horse, went on a shooting spree last March at her old alma mater/pater, Nashville’s Covenant Christian School, killing three 9-year-olds and three adults. As her murder manifesto was strangely not released to the public by authorities following the atrocity, her motives were initially presumed to comprise anti-Christian hatred.
Yet, in November, pages from Hale’s hate screed were leaked online. Surprisingly, the real motive behind the slaughter actually appeared one of anti-white hate…despite Audrey herself being white as a Moomin’s ghost:
Kill those kids!!! Those crackers [for non-US readers: an antiwhite slang term], going to private fancy schools…w/their daddies mustangs and convertables. Fuck you little shits. I wish to shoot you weakass dicks with your mop yellow hair. Wanna kill all you little crackers! Bunch of little faggots w/ your white privileges. Fuck you faggots.
What a bigoted little bitch. With their contemporary hypersensitivity toward racism of all kinds, surely the mainstream media would have been all over this, right? Hahaha, no. You have to head toward dissident sites like American Renaissance to get the full picture, where it is shown how Big Media in fact universally condemned the leaked content, calling for it to be locked away forever, whilst disingenuously misreporting Hale’s manifesto as containing highly vague contents like “hate-filled language directed toward the school and children.”
Rage, Rage, Against the Dying of the White
Let’s imagine white-skinned Audrey Hale had instead shot up a school full of black kids, leaving behind a note like this:
Kill those kids!!! Those niggers, going to worthless public schools…on crappy public transport. Fuck you little shits. I wish to shoot you weakass dicks with your big fat fuzzy afros. Wanna kill all you little coons! Bunch of little faggots w/ your black degeneracies. Fuck you faggots.
Do you seriously think these words wouldn’t be broadcast worldwide, forever, on an endless loop, to make white people realize once and for all what voting for evil Nazis like Viktor Orbán would inevitably lead to? This program of systematic oikophobic brainwashing has now become so internalized by many white Westerners that some now actively seek to murder their own kind, like homicidal cuckoos in the nest, a phenomenon I only expect to see grow.
But an equally prejudiced pro-white countermovement also now has scope to grow back in response too. Newly trapped within such a hostile racial environment, surrounded by deliberately shipped-in blacks and Muslims who hate them, many white Westerners will feel placed in a situation within which racism and bigotry become transformed from unpleasant and unnecessary qualities into forms of wholly rational racial self-defense.
Back in 2015, Matthew Richardson, a spokesman for British pro-Brexit party UKIP, gained flak for jokily telling an audience that: “I’ve said before, people talk about UKIP being bigots. There are hundreds of thousands of bigots in the United Kingdom and they deserve representation.” I laughed at the time. Now I agree with him. Why should only the left-wing bigots get a chance in government?
There is actually a respectable past political advocate for the benefits of prejudice, in shape of Edmund Burke, the 18th-century Anglo-Irish MP and key philosopher of conservative thought. In his 1790 book Reflections on the Revolution in France, Burke explained how such radical-led upheavals could only lead to complete social disaster. Far better, Burke argued, to remain safe and secure in adherence to the age-old, tried-and-tested prejudices of your forefathers and their “latent wisdom,” no matter how “outdated” some like Kata Karáth may call them:
You see sir…instead of casting away all our old prejudices, we [Englishmen] cherish them to a very considerable degree, and…cherish them because they are prejudices; and the longer they have lasted and the more generally they have prevailed, the more we cherish them. We are afraid to put men to live and trade each on his own private stock of reason, because we suspect that this stock in each man is small, and that the individuals would do better to avail themselves of the general bank and capital of nations and of ages…. [Utopian internationalist rebels] think that government may vary like modes of dress, and with as little ill-effect…. By this wise prejudice we are taught to look with horror on those children of their country who are prompt rashly to hack that aged parent in pieces and put him into the kettle of magicians, in hopes that by their poisonous weeds and wild incantations they may regenerate the paternal constitution and renovate their father’s life.
Wise words. But young Western people don’t read Edmund Burke at university anymore, do they? Instead they read Frantz Fanon. To include dead white males like Eddie on the curriculum these days would just be far too prejudiced. I bet they still read Burke in Hungary, though…
Dig your passport out again, Pierre, you’ve gone to the wrong ethno-state!
Steven Tucker’s new book Hitler’s & Stalin’s Misuse of Science: When Science Fiction Was Turned Into Science Fact by the Nazis and the Soviets is out now in hardback (Pen & Sword/Frontline Books). Buy it here (U.S.), here (U.K.), or here (direct from publisher).